Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Dual Regulation (dual + regulation)
Selected AbstractsDoc-mediated cell killing in Shigella flexneri using a C1/LacI controlled expression systemFEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 2 2002David A. Schofield Abstract In this report we describe the development of a highly stringent and dually regulated promoter system for Shigella flexneri. Dual regulation was provided by utilizing a promoter susceptible to control by the bacteriophage P1 temperature-sensitive C1 repressor that in turn was under the transcriptional control of LacI. The level of induction/repression ratios observed was up to 3700-fold in S. flexneri. The general utility of this promoter system was evaluated by demonstrating that the bacteriophage P1 post-segregational killer protein Doc mediates a bactericidal effect in S. flexneri. This represents the first report of Doc (death on curing)-mediated killing in this Gram-negative species. [source] The alternative , factor HrpL negatively modulates the flagellar system in the phytopathogenic bacterium Erwinia amylovora under hrp -inducing conditionsFEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 2 2006Sophie Cesbron Abstract In this work we present evidence of an opposite regulation in the phytopathogenic bacteria Erwinia amylovora between the virulence-associated Type III secretion system (TTSS) and the flagellar system. Using loss-of-function mutants we show that motility enhanced the virulence of wild-type bacteria relative to a nonmotile mutant when sprayed on apple seedlings with unwounded leaves. Then we demonstrated through analyses of motility, flagellin export and visualization of flagellar filament that HrpL, the positive key regulator of the TTSS, also down-regulates the flagellar system. Such a dual regulation mediated by an alternative , factor of the TTSS appears to be a level of regulation between virulence and motility not yet described among Proteobacteria. [source] The immune system: a weapon of mass destruction invented by evolution to even the odds during the war of the DNAsIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2002Melvin Cohn Summary: Living systems operate under interactive selective pressures. Populations have the ability to anticipate the future by generating a repertoire of elements that cope with new selective pressures. If the repertoire of such elements were transcendental, natural selection could not operate because any one of them would be too rare. This is the problem that vertebrates faced in order to deal with a vast number of pathogens. The solution was to invent an immune system that underwent somatic evolution. This required a random repertoire that was generated somatically and divided the antigenic universe into combinatorials of determinants. As a result, it became virtually impossible for pathogens to escape recognition but the functioning of such a repertoire required two new regulatory mechanisms: 1) a somatic discriminator between Not-To-Be-Ridded (,Self') and To-Be-Ridded (,Non-self') antigens, and 2) a way to optimize the magnitude and choice of the class of the effector response. The principles governing this dual regulation are analyzed in the light of natural selection. Abstract I.,Introduction A. ,...doth protest too much' Living things obey the laws of natural selection What started the wars between the DNAs? The passage from germline to somatic evolution? E. Two classes of pathogen must be faced F. Two pathways are required for a successful immune response, II. The NTBR,TBR discrimination A. The three laws of the NTBR-TBR discrimination B. The mechanism of the NTBR-TBR discrimination C. Facing the "chicken and egg" problem III. The regulation of effector class IV. The somatically selected immune repertoire A. The Protecton is the unit of function B. The humoral immune system C. The cell-mediated immune system D. The meaning of specificity V. Why understand when you can cure without it? VI. Coda: Extracting the postulates used to explain immune behavior O.K. José! What would it take to change your mind? Mechkonik [source] Molecular and physiological analysis of an OxyR-regulated ahpC promoter in Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoliMOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 6 2000Suvit Loprasert In Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli, a gene for the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C (ahpC) had unique patterns of regulation by various forms of OxyR. Reduced OxyR repressed expression of the gene, whereas oxidized OxyR activated its expression. This dual regulation of ahpC is unique and unlike all other OxyR-regulated genes. The ahpC transcription start site was determined. Analysis of the region upstream of the site revealed promoter sequences that had high homology to the Xanthomonas consensus promoter sequence. Data from gel shift experiments indicated that both reduced and oxidized OxyR could bind to the ahpC regulatory region. Moreover, the reduced and the oxidized forms of OxyR gave different DNase I footprint patterns, indicating that they bound to different sites. The oxidized OxyR binding site overlapped the ,35 region of the ahpC promoter by a few bases. This position is consistent with the role of the protein in activating transcription of the gene. Binding of reduced OxyR to the ahpC promoter showed an extended DNase I footprint and DNase I hypersensitive sites, suggesting that binding of the protein caused a shift in the binding site and bending of the target DNA. In addition, binding of reduced OxyR completely blocked the ,35 region of the ahpC promoter and prevented binding of RNA polymerase, leading to repression of the gene. Monitoring of the ahpC promoter activity in vivo confirmed the location of the oxidized OxyR binding site required for activation of the promoter. A mutant that separated OxyR regulation from basal ahpC promoter activity was constructed. The mutant was unable to respond to oxidants by increasing ahpC expression. Physiologically, it had a slower aerobic growth rate and was more sensitive to organic peroxide killing. This indicated that oxidant induction of ahpC has important physiological roles in normal growth and during oxidative stress. [source] Role of Src in ligand-specific regulation of ,-opioid receptor desensitization and internalizationJOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, Issue 1 2009Min-Hua Hong Abstract The opioid receptors are a member of G protein-coupled receptors that mediate physiological effects of endogenous opioid peptides and structurally distinct opioid alkaloids. Although it is well characterized that there is differential receptor desensitization and internalization properties following activation by distinct agonists, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. We investigated the signaling events of ,-opioid receptor (,OR) initiated by two ligands, DPDPE and TIPP. We found that although both ligands inhibited adenylyl cyclase (AC) and activated ERK1/2, only DPDPE induced desensitization and internalization of the ,OR. We further found that DPDPE, instead of TIPP, could activate GRK2 by phosphorylating the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Src and translocating it to membrane receptors. Activation of GRK2 led to the phosphorylation of serine residues in the C-terminal tail, which facilitates ,-arrestin1/2 membrane translocation. Meanwhile, we also found that DPDPE promoted ,-arrestin1 dephosphorylation in a Src-dependent manner. Thus, DPDPE appears to strengthen ,-arrestin function by dual regulations: promoting ,-arrestin recruitment and increasing ,-arrestin dephosphorylation at the plasma membrane in a Src-dependent manner. All effects initiated by DPDPE could be abolished or suppressed by PP2, an inhibitor of Src. Morphine, which has been previously shown to be unable to desensitize or internalize ,OR, also behaved as TIPP in failure to utilize Src to regulate ,OR signaling. These findings point to the existence of agonist-specific utilization of Src to regulate ,OR signaling and reveal the molecular events by which Src modulates ,OR responsiveness. [source] | ||||||||||