Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Drive Cycle Length (drive + cycle_length)
Selected AbstractsInfluence of Drive Cycle Length on Initiation of Ventricular Fibrillation During Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Threshold TestingPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2006NEIL K. SANGHVI Background: Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart as a method to induce tachyarrhythmias has been described since the 1960s. To date, no study has examined optimal drive cycle length in the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) during defibrillation threshold testing after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. We hypothesized that longer drive cycle length, by means of the longer action potential duration, would promote intramyocardial phase 2 reentry and facilitate induction of VF. Methods: Fifty consecutive implants were randomized in a prospective crossover format for this study. The group consisted of 40 men and 10 women, with each patient receiving either a 400 or 600 ms initial drive train prior to 1.2 J internal shock on the T wave with a goal to induce ventricular fibrillation. The timing of the T wave shock was determined by measuring the interval from the beginning of the QRS to the apex of the T wave in lead II. Successful inductions were defibrillated via the cardioverter defibrillator. Patients were then crossed over and the protocol repeated. Results: Twenty of 23 (87%) patients were successfully induced into VF in the initial 400 ms drive train arm whereas 22 of 27 (81%) were successfully induced in the 600 ms arm. Thus, a total of 44 (88%) patients were successfully induced at 400 ms, 41 (82%) patients were successfully induced at 600 ms, and 2 (4%) patients were not inducible at either cycle length, but were inducible with 50 Hz ventricular stimulation. However, no significant difference was noted between the two groups. Conclusion: No investigation to date has questioned whether a relationship exists between drive cycle length and initiation of ventricular fibrillation. Our study addresses this question, though negative for difference between 400 and 600 ms drive trains. Further research into optimal strategies for inducing ventricular fibrillation will minimize patient sedation time and discomfort while undergoing defibrillator threshold testing. [source] Reversal of Electrical Remodeling After Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial FibrillationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2004MERRITT H. RAITT M.D. Introduction: In animals, atrial fibrillation results in reversible atrial electrical remodeling manifested as shortening of the atrial effective refractory period, slowing of intra-atrial conduction, and prolongation of sinus node recovery time. There is limited information on changes in these parameters after cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results: Thirty-eight patients who had been in atrial fibrillation for 1 to 12 months underwent electrophysiologic testing 10 minutes and 1 hour after cardioversion. At 1 week, 19 patients still in sinus rhythm returned for repeat testing. Reverse remodeling of the effective refractory period was not uniform across the three atrial sites tested. At the lateral right atrium, there was a highly significant increase in the effective refractory period between 10 minutes and 1 hour after cardioversion (drive cycle length 400 ms: 204 ± 17 ms vs 211 ± 20 ms, drive cycle length 550 ms: 213 ± 18 ms vs 219 ± 23 ms, P < 0.001). The effective refractory period at the coronary sinus and distal coronary sinus did not change in the first hour but had increased by 1 week. The corrected sinus node recovery time did not change in the first hour but was shorter at 1 week (606 ± 311 ms vs 408 ± 160 ms, P = 0.009). P wave duration also was shorter at 1 week (135 ± 18 ms vs 129 ± 13 ms, P = 0.04) consistent with increasing atrial conduction velocity. Conclusion: The atrial effective refractory period increases, sinus node function improves, and atrial conduction velocity goes up in the first week after cardioversion of long-standing atrial fibrillation in humans. Reverse electrical remodeling of the effective refractory period occurs at different rates in different regions of the atrium. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 507-512, May 2004) [source] Influence of Drive Cycle Length on Initiation of Ventricular Fibrillation During Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Threshold TestingPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2006NEIL K. SANGHVI Background: Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart as a method to induce tachyarrhythmias has been described since the 1960s. To date, no study has examined optimal drive cycle length in the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) during defibrillation threshold testing after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. We hypothesized that longer drive cycle length, by means of the longer action potential duration, would promote intramyocardial phase 2 reentry and facilitate induction of VF. Methods: Fifty consecutive implants were randomized in a prospective crossover format for this study. The group consisted of 40 men and 10 women, with each patient receiving either a 400 or 600 ms initial drive train prior to 1.2 J internal shock on the T wave with a goal to induce ventricular fibrillation. The timing of the T wave shock was determined by measuring the interval from the beginning of the QRS to the apex of the T wave in lead II. Successful inductions were defibrillated via the cardioverter defibrillator. Patients were then crossed over and the protocol repeated. Results: Twenty of 23 (87%) patients were successfully induced into VF in the initial 400 ms drive train arm whereas 22 of 27 (81%) were successfully induced in the 600 ms arm. Thus, a total of 44 (88%) patients were successfully induced at 400 ms, 41 (82%) patients were successfully induced at 600 ms, and 2 (4%) patients were not inducible at either cycle length, but were inducible with 50 Hz ventricular stimulation. However, no significant difference was noted between the two groups. Conclusion: No investigation to date has questioned whether a relationship exists between drive cycle length and initiation of ventricular fibrillation. Our study addresses this question, though negative for difference between 400 and 600 ms drive trains. Further research into optimal strategies for inducing ventricular fibrillation will minimize patient sedation time and discomfort while undergoing defibrillator threshold testing. [source] Electrophysiologicai Characteristics of the Atrium in Sinus Node Dysfunction With and Without Postpacing Atrial FihriliationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2000ANTONIO DE SISTI DE SISTI, A., ET AL.: Electrophysiologicai Characteristics of the Atrium in Sinus Node Dysfunction With and Without Postpacing Atrial Fibrillation . In patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) with or without associated paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), the effectiveness of atrial pacing in reducing the incidence of AF is not definitive. In addition, despite several studies involving large populations of implanted patients, little attention has been paid to the electrophysioiogicai (EP) atrial substrate and the effect of permanent atrial pacing. The aim of this study is to correlate EP data and the risk of AF after DDD device implantation. We reviewed FP data of 38 consecutive patients with SND. mean age 70 ± 8 years, who were investigated free of antiarrhythmic treatment, for the evaluation of the atrial substrate. We also considered as control group 25 subjects, mean age 63 ± 14 years, referred to our EP laboratory for unexplained syncope or various atrioventricular disturbances. Following pharmacological washout and at a drive cycle length of 600 ms. effective and functional refractory periods (ERP, FRP), Sl-Al and S2-A2 latency, Al and A2 conduction duration, and latent vulnerability index (EHP/A2) were measured. AF induction was tested with up to three extrastimuli at paced cycle lengths of 600 and 400 ms in 20 patients. Induction of sustained AF (> 30 seconds) was considered as the endpoint. P wave duration on the surface ECG in lead II/Vl was also measured. DDD pacing mode was chosen in all patients with the minimal atrial rate programmed between 60 and 75 beats/min (mean 64 ± 4 beats/min). After implantation, the patients were followed-up for 29 ± 17 months and clinically documented occurrence of AF was determined. When comparing patients with SND and subjects of the control group, we did not find any significant statistical differences in terms of ERP (237 ± 33 vs 250 ± 29 ms), FRP (276 ± 30 vs 280 ± 32 ms) and Sl-Al (39 ± 16 vs 33 ± 11 ms) and S2-A2 latency (69 ± 24 vs 63 ± 25 ms). In contrast, we observed significant differences regarding Al (55 ± 19 vs 39 ± 13 ms; P < 0.001), A2 (95 ± 34 vs 57 ± 18 ms; P < 0.001) and P wave duration (104 ± 18 vs 94 ± 15 ms; P < 0.05), and ERP/A2 (2.8 ± 1.2 vs 4.8 ± 1.6; P < 0.001). When comparing patients with (n = 11) or without (n =27) postpacing AF occurrence, we did not find any difference with reference to ERP, FRP. Sl-Al, S2-A2, Al duration, or follow-up duration. In patients with postpacing AF occurrence, A2 was longer (116 ± 41 vs 87 ± 27 ms; P < 0.01), FRP/A2 lower (2.1 ± 0.4 vs 3.1 ± 1.4; P < 0.05), P wave more prolonged (116 ± 22 vs 99 ± 14 ms; P < 0.01), and preexisting AF history predominant (6/11 vs 5/27 patients; P < 0.05). No difference was observed between patients with (n = 8) and without (n = 12) AF induction during the EP study. In patients with SND, the atrial refractoriness appears normal and the most important abnormality concerns conduction slowing disturbances. Persistence of AF despite pacing stresses the importance of mechanisms responsible for AF not entirely brady-dependent. In this setting, more prolonged atrial conduction disturbances, responsible for a low vulnerability index, and a preexisting history of AF enable us to identify a high risk patient group for AF in the follow-up. sinus node dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, electrophysiologicai study, atrial pacing [source] | ||||||||||