			Home About us Contact

Drug-eluting Stent Implantation (drug-eluting + stent_implantation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents Following Rotational Atherectomy for Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesions: Late Angiographic and Clinical Follow-Up Results

JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2007
AHMED A. KHATTAB M.D.
Objectives: To study the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents following rotablation of severely calcified lesions. Background: Drug-eluting stents are increasingly showing promising results in complex lesions and high-risk patients. Heavily calcified stenoses have not been adequately studied, and form a challenge both for the immediate and late outcomes. Methods: Single-center prospective study among 27 patients treated by rotablation followed by a drug-eluting stent implantation for angiographically heavily calcified lesions, compared with a historical control of 34 patients treated by rotablation followed by bare stent implantation for the same indication. The primary endpoint was the late lumen loss at 9 months; secondary endpoints were binary restenosis and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months. A 2-year follow-up directed to death and myocardial infarction was added. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding baseline and procedural characteristics. Angiographic success was 100% for both groups. At 9 months, there was a significant difference in the late lumen loss (0.11 ± 0.7 mm in the DES group and 1.11 ± 0.9 mm in the BMS group, P = 0.001). This difference was manifest in the clinical event rates at late follow-up (combined incidence of death due to any cause, MI, and TLR was 7.4% in the DES group and 38.2% in the BMS group; P = 0.004). At 2 years, there were 5 deaths in each group (P = 0.5) and 2 infarctions in the BMS group versus none in the DES group (P = 1.0). Conclusion: The combination of rotablation and drug-eluting stent implantation (Rota-DES) has a favorable effect on clinical and angiographic outcomes at 9 months when treating heavily calcified lesions compared to rotablation followed by bare metal stent implantation. No safety concerns are observed at 2 years. [source]

Defining a new standard for IVUS optimized drug-eluting stent implantation,The PRAVIO study: Do we know the right technique for stent optimization?,

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 2 2009
FSCAI, Massoud A. Leesar MD
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Improved survival with drug-eluting stent implantation in comparison with bare metal stent in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2006
FACC, Giuseppe Gioia MD
Abstract OBJECTIVE: We examined the efficacy of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation (Sirolimus or Paclitaxel) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and compared the outcome with a similar group of patients undergoing bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. BACKGROUND: Patients with severe LV dysfunction are a high risk group. DES may improve the long term outcomes compared with BMS. METHODS: One hundred and ninety one patients (23% women) with severe LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction ,35%) underwent coronary stent implantation between May 2002 and May 2005 and were available for follow-up. One hundred and twenty eight patients received DES (Sirolimus in 72 and Paclitaxel in 54) and 63 patients had BMS. Patients with acute S-T elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were excluded. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. A composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 420 ± 271 days. No differences were noted in age (69 ± 10 years vs. 70 ± 10 years, P = NS), number of vessel disease (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 2.2 ± 0.8, P = NS), history of congestive heart failure (47% vs. 46%, P = NS), MI (60% vs. 61%, P = NS), or number of treated vessels (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.6, P = NS) for the DES and BMS group, respectively. Diabetes was more common among DES patients (45% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was similar between the two groups (28% ± 6% vs. 26% ± 8%, P = NS for the DES and BMS, respectively). During the follow-up, there were a total of 25 deaths of which two were cancer related (2 in DES group). There were 23 cardiac deaths, 8/126 (6%) which occurred in the DES group and 15/63 (24%) in the BMS group (P = 0.05 by log-rank test). MACE rate was 10% for the DES group and 41% for the BMS group (P = 0.003). NYHA class improved in both groups (from 2.5 ± 0.8 to 1.7 ± 0.8 in DES and from 2 ± 0.8 to 1.4 ± 0.7 in the BMS, P = NS). CONCLUSION: Compared with bare-metal stents, DES implantation reduces mortality and MACE in high risk patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Sirolimus-eluting stents for the prevention of restenosis in a worst-case scenario of diffuse and recurrent in-stent restenosis

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2004
Gerald S. Werner MD
Abstract For recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR), surgical revascularization or brachytherapy is still the principal therapeutic options. The present investigation explores the efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent to prevent restenosis in these lesions with a high risk of recurrence. In 22 consecutive patients with a recurrent and diffuse ISR, a sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted to cover the restenotic lesion. All patients were followed clinically for at least 1 year and underwent a repeat angiography after 7 months. A quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was done. The target vessel failure was 14% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, with an angiographic late loss of only 0.39 ± 0.54. No subacute stent thrombosis was observed, and the 1-year event-free survival was 86%. The three cases with restenosis were all focal and could be successfully treated by additional drug-eluting stent implantation. This study showed the efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent for the prevention of restenosis in a worst-case scenario of recurrent and diffuse ISR. The observed restenosis rate is lower than that reported after brachytherapy and suggests that sirolimus-eluting stents are a promising treatment option for ISR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:259,264. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]