Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Double Standards (double + standards)
Selected AbstractsThe Dilemma of Double Standards in U.S. Human Rights PolicyPEACE & CHANGE, Issue 4 2003Scott Turner In May 2000 the United States was voted off of the United Nations Human Rights Commission. This reflected the frustration of much of the international community with the United States' increasingly obstructionist approach to international institutionalism. The United States' opposition to the proposed International Criminal Court (ICC) reflects its pursuit of double standards in human rights policy. Double standards are manifest in U.S. support for Israel and Turkey with their records of gross human rights violations. They likewise are discernable in the strategic motives behind the 1999 Kosovo intervention. The proposed ICC challenges the United States' use of human rights rhetoric to pursue unilateral objectives by forging a more neutral means of prosecuting international justice. If the United States is to recover its status as the world's human rights leader, it must renew its commitment to multilateral institutionalism and must avoid double standards that undermine the legitimacy of human rights discourse. [source] Good practice in plasma collection and fractionationISBT SCIENCE SERIES: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTRACELLULAR TRANSPORT, Issue n1 2010C. Schärer The control strategy to ensure safety of blood products includes a combination of measures focusing on ensuring the quality and safety of starting material by careful donor selection and testing strategies at different levels, together with validated manufacturing processes, including steps to inactivate or remove potential contaminating agents. Using an approach based on good manufacturing practice (GMP) provides a manufacturing model that allows for a documented system of incorporating quality throughout the entire manufacturing process and describes the activities and controls needed to consistently produce products that comply with specifications and are safe for use. There are no doubts that the aim of providing safe and high-quality product to the patients should be the same for all products derived from human blood, independent of its use either as a blood component for direct transfusion or as industrially manufactured product. It would be difficult to justify whether for blood components the good practice standards and for plasma derivatives the GMP standards for manufacturing would not ensure equivalent levels of quality and safety. To ensure a high level of quality and safety of blood components and plasma derivatives, the implementation of double standards in blood establishments and fractionation industry would not be effective and should be avoided. Harmonized standards and good practices for collection and fractionation, based on the principles of GMP, should be envisaged in the whole chain of manufacturing blood components and plasma derivatives. Global initiatives to further promote the implementation of harmonized GMP for the collection in blood establishments and a stringent regulatory control are ongoing. This would further contribute to the global availability of plasma-derived medicinal products. [source] The Dilemma of Double Standards in U.S. Human Rights PolicyPEACE & CHANGE, Issue 4 2003Scott Turner In May 2000 the United States was voted off of the United Nations Human Rights Commission. This reflected the frustration of much of the international community with the United States' increasingly obstructionist approach to international institutionalism. The United States' opposition to the proposed International Criminal Court (ICC) reflects its pursuit of double standards in human rights policy. Double standards are manifest in U.S. support for Israel and Turkey with their records of gross human rights violations. They likewise are discernable in the strategic motives behind the 1999 Kosovo intervention. The proposed ICC challenges the United States' use of human rights rhetoric to pursue unilateral objectives by forging a more neutral means of prosecuting international justice. If the United States is to recover its status as the world's human rights leader, it must renew its commitment to multilateral institutionalism and must avoid double standards that undermine the legitimacy of human rights discourse. [source] Some Australian Children's Perceptions of Physical Punishment in ChildhoodCHILDREN & SOCIETY, Issue 6 2008Bernadette J. Saunders Despite ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, children remain the only people in Australia against whom violence may be justified as discipline. This article presents findings from qualitative research conducted in the State of Victoria, in which children were invited to contextualise incidents of physical punishment by describing the experience from different standpoints and reflecting on the feelings and motivations of victims and perpetrators. The research provides new insights into children's experiences of childhood ,discipline', as children reveal the physical and emotional impact of being hit by a parent, the futility of ,physical punishment', parents' confusing reactions and children's awareness of double standards. Children suggest more positive ways to communicate and to resolve conflict, and provide insightful comments that have the potential to enlighten adults' thinking about the issue. [source] | ||||||||||