			Home About us Contact

Donor Registry (donor + registry)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Probabilities of heart donors arising within specified times for child recipients

JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, Issue 1-2 2007
John C Galati
Aim: To determine the availability of donor hearts for children of different blood group and weight needing urgent heart transplantation. Methods: Data maintained by the Australia and New Zealand Organ Donor Registry 1989,2004 were analysed to determine the frequency of donation. Probabilities of suitable donor availability within 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 90 and 180 days were estimated using a Poisson model with the assumptions that traditional ABO blood compatibilities applied, suitable donors were 0.8,4.0 times the recipient's body weight (BW) and suitable adult donors were aged <40 years. Results: Probabilities of suitable donor availability increase with passage of time from 10 to 180 days and decrease with competition from other needful recipients. Maximum suitable donor availability occurs for children of all blood groups at body weight 20 kg. The probabilities of a donor heart arising within 40 days (maximum safe duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support locally available for young children) for this recipient body weight according to blood group is 0.89, 0.85, 0.73, 0.67 (AB, A, B, O). Probabilities for recipients of BW 3 kg and 60 kg respectively are 0.16, 0.14, 0.10, 0.09 (AB, A, B, O) and 0.66, 0.61, 0.47, 0.42 (AB, A, B, O). Conclusion: Expectation of suitable heart donation arising within 40 days for needful recipients in Australia is low for infants (probability <0.3), moderate for small children (probability 0.5,0.9) and modest for large children (probability 0.4,0.7), with variation at all body weights according to blood group and waiting time. [source]

Evidence for a need to mandate kidney transplant living donor registries

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2008
Mahmoud Emara
Abstract:, Kidney disease is a global public health problem of growing proportions. Currently the best treatment for end-stage renal failure is transplantation. Living organ donation remains a complex ethical, moral and medical issue. It is based on a premise that kidney donation is associated with short-term minimal risks to harm the donor, and is outweighed by the definite advantages to the recipient. A growing number of patients with end-stage renal disease and shortage of kidney donors poses a pressing need to expand the criteria needed to accept kidney donors. The current donor registries are structured and are driven to expand donor pool. As living kidney donation is not without risks, more attention should be given to protect the donor health. After kidney donation, mild to moderate renal insufficiency may occur. Renal insufficiency, even mild, is associated with increased risks of hypertension, proteinuria and cardiovascular morbidity. We, therefore, foresee a need to mandate the establishment of renal transplant donor registries at all transplanting programs as a prerequisite to protect the long-term well being of kidney donors. These registries can collect the database necessary to develop standards of practice and guidelines for future kidney donation. [source]

Determination of HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 haplotypes based on allelic homozygosity data in selected bone marrow donors of the Taiwanese marrow donor registry

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMMUNOGENETICS, Issue 5 2007
K. L. Yang
Summary From 120 unrelated Taiwanese marrow stem cell donors with allelic homozygosities at human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B and -DRB1 loci, we determined 85 distinguishable haplotypes. Using the predetermined haplotype data, we deduced 418 haplotypes from 1903 unrelated individual stem cell donors selected for HLA confirmatory test. Eighteen of the 20 (90%) most frequently observed haplotypes determined in Asian Americans using computer prediction were found in this study. In comparison with haplotypes determined by maximum likelihood algorithm in Korean population, 18 of the 29 (62.07%) Korean haplotypes with a frequency over 0.5% were also among the haplotypes determined in this investigation. Randomized family studies confirmed that over 50% of the haplotypes observed in the families were among the haplotypes deduced based on allelic homozygosity, suggesting that proportionally additional haplotypes can be determined as the number of donors being studied is increased. Haplotypes carrying low incidence allele characteristics of Taiwanese were also observed in this study. This established haplotype information will be beneficial for patients searching for stem cell donors in our registry domestically and internationally. [source]

Is Rapid Organ Recovery a Good Idea?

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2009
An Exploratory Study of the Public's Knowledge, Attitudes
In 2006, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended demonstration projects on uncontrolled donation after cardiac death or rapid organ recovery (ROR). To investigate what the public thinks about key ethical and policy questions associated with ROR, 70 African-American, Caucasian and Latino community members in St. Louis, MO, participated in focus groups and completed surveys, before and after being educated about ROR. Before the focus group, most participants believed mistakenly that they could donate organs following an unexpected cardiac arrest (76%). After the focus group, 84% would want to donate organs after unexpected cardiac arrest; 81% would support organ cooling to enable this. The public generally supported organ cooling without family consent if the individual had joined the donor registry, but were mixed in their opinions about what should be done if they were not on the registry. African-American and Latino participants expressed greater fears than Caucasians that if they consented to organ donation, physicians might do less to save their life; however, support for ROR was not significantly lower in these subgroups. Although this study is exploratory, public support for ROR was present. We recommend that adequate consent processes and safeguards be established to foster trust and support for ROR. [source]

Living donation: focus on public concerns

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2005
Consensus statement
Abstract:, In December 2002, a conference was held in Philadelphia to discuss public concerns about living organ transplantation with the goal of reaching a consensus about new strategies for such transplants. The conference was hosted by the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Center for Bioethics. A multidisciplinary group of leading experts and stakeholders was called to assess the current status of living donation and suggest productive changes to ensure safer and more ethically sound procedures for both donors and recipients. Prior to the meeting, the research team from the University of Pennsylvania, Center for Bioethics, conducted literature reviews and extensive background research on living organ transplantation. Summary briefs were prepared for all conference participants. Issues were divided into four subcategories; two or three experts led the discussion on each topic. At the conclusion of the conference, the points raised were summarized and discussed, and additional comments were offered before general agreement was reached on each subject. Transcribed minutes and summary statements were reviewed and circulated among participants to allow for additional comments and clarification. All feedback was incorporated into the statement, and a draft of the article was recirculated. Participants who have endorsed the following statements have agreed that these points represent the intent and spirit of the discussion, yet each participant reserves the right to disclaim the document in its entirety. The views represented in the consensus points are held by members of the consensus group and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsor. A consensus was reached to propose new strategies and make improvements on existing practices and protocols. Specific attention was paid to the widely accepted needs of consistent and responsible communication with the public and press, standardization in donor assessment, a national living donor registry and new research focusing on larger sample numbers and long-term donor follow-up. These consensus points support the work carried out by other advisory transplant organizations and should assist in advocating for living organ donors, the live donor transplant process and the concerns of the public. [source]