Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Donor Evaluation (donor + evaluation)
Selected AbstractsPediatric Heart Transplantation: Current Clinical ReviewJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 1 2008D.Sc., F.I.C.S., M.B.A., M.P.H., M.Sc., Yanto Sandy Tjang M.D. Its incidence and prevalence is increasing and imposes substantial burden on the health care system. Despite much progress in development of many new drugs and innovations in palliative surgical strategy, nontransplant cardiac surgical procedures and the use of mechanical assist devices, pediatric heart transplantation remains the best treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure. So far, more than 6000 pediatric heart transplantations have been performed worldwide. This article reviews some clinical aspects of pediatric heart transplantation, including the history, indications and contraindications, donor evaluation and recipient management, surgical techniques, risk factors of mortality, and survival of pediatric heart transplantation. The short- and long-term outcomes of pediatric heart transplantation are encouraging. However, the lack of donor hearts still hampers its clinical application. [source] Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: The adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study,,§LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2008Jeffrey Campsen For acute liver failure (ALF), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may reduce waiting time and provide better timing compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, there are concerns that a partial graft would result in reduced survival of critically ill LDLT recipients and that the rapid evolution of ALF would lead to selection of inappropriate donors. We report outcomes for ALF patients (and their donors) evaluated for LDLT between 1998 and April 2007 from the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort. Of the 1201 potential LDLT recipients, 14 had ALF, only 6 of whom had an identified cause. The median time from listing to first donor evaluation was 1.5 days, and the median time from evaluation to transplantation was 1 day. One patient recovered without liver transplant, 3 of 10 LDLT recipients died, and 1 of 3 DDLT recipients died. Five of the 10 living donors had a total of 7 posttransplant complications. In conclusion, LDLT is rarely performed for ALF, but in selected patients it may be associated with acceptable recipient mortality and donor morbidity. Liver Transpl 14:1273,1280, 2008. © 2008 AASLD. [source] Hepatic venous congestion in living donor liver transplantation: Preoperative quantitative prediction and follow-up using computed tomographyLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2004Shin Hwang Hepatic venous congestion (HVC) has not been assessed quantitatively prior to hepatectomy and its resolving mechanism has not been fully analyzed. We devised and verified a new method to predict HVC, in which HVC was estimated from delineation of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries in computed tomography (CT) images. The predicted HVC was transferred to the right hepatic lobes of 20 living donors using a paper scale, and it was compared with the actual observed HVC that occurred after parenchymal transection and arterial clamping. The evolution of HVC from its emergence to resolution was followed up with CT. Volume proportions of the predicted and observed HVC were 31.7 ± 6.3% and 31.3 ± 9.4% of right lobe volume (RLV) (P = .74), respectively, which resulted in a prediction error of 3.8 ± 3.7% of RLV. We observed the changes in the HVC area of the right lobes both in donors without MHV trunk and in recipients with MHV reconstruction. After 7 days, the HVC of 33.5 ± 7.7% of RLV was changed to a computed tomography attenuation abnormality (CTAA) of 28.4 ± 5.3% of RLV in 12 donor remnant right lobes, and the HVC of 29.1 ± 11.5% of RLV was reduced to a CTAA of 9.3 ± 3.2% of RLV in 7 recipient right lobe grafts with MHV reconstruction. There was no parenchymal regeneration of the HVC area in donor remnant livers during first 7 days. In conclusion, we believe that this CT-based method for HVC prediction deserves to be applied as an inevitable part of preoperative donor evaluation. The changes in CTAA observed in the right lobes of donors and recipients indicate that MHV reconstruction can effectively decrease the HVC area. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:763,770.) [source] Is the Cost of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Higher Than Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation?LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2004Mark W. Russo MD Background An important long-term consideration for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation. LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluation, donor surgery, and postoperative donor care must be included in a cost analysis for LDLT. In this study, we compare the comprehensive cost of LDLT with that of cadaveric-liver transplantation. Methods All costs for medical services provided at our institution were recorded for 24 LDLT and 43 cadaveric recipients with greater than 1 year follow-up transplanted between August 1997 and April 2000. The donor costs include donors evaluated and rejected, donors evaluated and accepted, donor right hepatectomy costs, and donor follow-up costs (365 days postdonation). LDLT and cadaveric recipient costs include medical care 90 days pre-LDLT, recipient transplant costs, and recipient follow-up costs (365 days posttransplant) including retransplantation. Cost is expressed as an arbitrary cost unit (CU) that is a value between $500 to $1,500. Results Total LDLT costs (evaluations of rejected donors + evaluations of accepted donors + donor hepatectomy + donor follow-up care for 1 year + pretransplant recipient care [90 days pretransplant] + recipient transplantation + recipient 1-year posttransplant care)= 162.7 CU. Total mean cadaveric transplant costs (pretransplant recipient care [90 days pretransplant] + recipient transplantation [including organ acquisition cost] + recipient 1-year posttransplant care)=134.5 CU, (P = ns) Conclusions The total comprehensive cost of LDLT is 21% higher than cadaveric transplantation, although this difference is not significant. (Transplantation 2003;75:473,476.) [source] Living related small bowel transplantation in children: 3-dimensional computed tomography donor evaluationPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2004Fabrizio Panaro Abstract:, The evaluation of the small bowel vascular anatomy of living small bowel donors (LSBD) is usually performed with conventional angiography (CA). Recently, angio computed tomography (CT) has become a valid study of the vascular anatomy for kidney and liver living donors. We studied the applicability of angio CT with 3-D reconstruction (3-D-ACT) in the evaluation of LSBD. Potential LSBDs for pediatric transplant underwent both CA and 3-D-ACT to evaluate the anatomy of the distal branches of the superior mesenteric artery and vein. Angio-CT was performed with General Electric Lightspeed Scanner. The 3-D reconstruction was performed on the TeraRecon workstation. Adverse reactions, contrast dosage, test duration, invasiveness, hospital-stay, patient discomforts and accuracy were evaluated. Four potential donors (four female; mean age: 30.5 yr; mean BMI: 28.4) underwent both tests. Adverse reactions correlated to contrast agent used (90 mL CA, 150 mL 3-D-ACT) were not reported. CA required a hospitalization of 6 h as opposed to immediate discharge after the 3-D-ACT. The CA required the placement of transfemoral catheter and therefore greater patient discomfort than with 3-D-ACT. The 3-D-ACT arterial images were rated as equivalent to CA, however, 3-D-ACT venous images were rated better than the CA in all cases. CT-angiography with 3-D reconstruction is an acceptable method for vascular evaluation. When compared with routine angiography, it is less invasive, better tolerated and faster, but does require a significantly greater volume of venous contrast. 3-D-ACT also offers a better evaluation of the venous phase, and thus may become the test of choice to evaluate the vascular anatomies of LSBD candidates. [source] Evaluating Living Kidney Donors: Relationship Types, Psychosocial Criteria, and Consent Processes at US Transplant ProgramsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2007J. R. Rodrigue We conducted a survey of 132 US kidney transplant programs to examine how they evaluate and select potential living kidney donors, focusing on donor-recipient relationships, psychosocial criteria, and consent processes. There is heterogeneity in donor-recipient relationships that are considered acceptable, although most programs (70%) will not consider publicly solicited donors. Most programs (75%) require a psychosocial evaluation for all potential living donors. Most programs agree that knowledge of financial reward (90%), active substance abuse (86%), and active mental health problems (76%) are absolute contraindications to donation. However, there is greater variability in how other psychosocial issues are considered in the selection process. Consent processes are highly variable across programs: donor and recipient consent for the donor evaluation is presumed in 57% and 76% of programs, respectively. The use of 13 different informed consent elements varied from 65% (alternative donation procedures) to 86% (description of evaluation, surgery and recuperative period) of programs. Forty-three percent use a ,cooling off' period. Findings demonstrate high variability in current practice regarding acceptable donor-recipient relationships, psychosocial criteria, and consent processes. Whether greater consensus should be reached on these donor evaluation practices, especially in the context of more expansive use of living donor kidney transplantation, is discussed. [source] Concomitant Surgery With Laparoscopic Live Donor NephrectomyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2003Ernesto P. Molmenti Routine live donor evaluations reveal unexpected silent pathologies. Herein, we describe our experience treating such pathologies at the time of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. We have not encountered any previous reports of such an approach. We prospectively collected data on 321 donors. Concomitant surgeries at the time of procurement included two laparoscopic adrenalectomies, one colposuspension, one laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and one liver biopsy. Mean operative time was 321 min (range 230,380), with a mean blood loss of 280 mL (range 150,500). No blood transfusions were required. The left kidney was procured in four cases. The right kidney was obtained on one occasion. Mean hospital stay was 3 days (median 3, range 2,4). No short- or long-term complications have been identified. Mean follow-up time was 2.63 years (median 2.76, range 2.23,2.99). Four of the five kidney recipients were first-time transplants who had not yet started dialysis. Simultaneous surgical interventions at the time of laparoscopic live kidney donation are safe and can be undertaken in selected cases. This practice is beneficial to both the donor and the recipient, and is likely to become more commonplace with changing practice patterns involving donor evaluation and management. [source] Sense of coherence and social support predict living liver donors' emotional stress prior to living-donor liver transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2008Yesim Erim Abstract:, The protection of the donors from physical or emotional harm has been a fundamental principle in living-donor liver donation from the beginning. Psychosomatic donor evaluation aims at the selection of eligible donors and the screening and exclusion of psychiatrically vulnerable donors. As clinical interviews may include subjective biases, efforts should be made to establish objective criteria for donor assessment. In recent research, protective factors have been reported to be a significant force behind healthy adjustment to life stresses and can be investigated as possible predictors of donors' eligibility. Being the central construct of Antonovsky's theory of salutogenesis, the sense of coherence is one of the most surveyed protective factors and a good predictor of individuals' stability when experiencing stress. Furthermore, family support has been shown to be a valuable protective resource in coping with stress. This study surveyed whether sense of coherence and social support predict donors' emotional strain prior to transplantation. Seventy-one donor candidates were included in the study during the donor evaluation prior to living-donor liver transplantation. Sense of coherence proved to be a significant predictor for all criterion variables, namely anxiety, depression and mental quality of life. In addition to this, donor candidates who were classified as eligible for donation in the psychosomatic interview had significantly higher values on sense of coherence total scores compared with rejected donors. In a multiple regression analysis, sense of coherence and social support together yielded a prediction of depression with an explained variance of 22% (R2 = 0.22). Sense of coherence and social support can be implemented as self-rating instruments in the psychosomatic selection of donors and would help to further objectify donors' eligibility. [source] Concomitant Surgery With Laparoscopic Live Donor NephrectomyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2003Ernesto P. Molmenti Routine live donor evaluations reveal unexpected silent pathologies. Herein, we describe our experience treating such pathologies at the time of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. We have not encountered any previous reports of such an approach. We prospectively collected data on 321 donors. Concomitant surgeries at the time of procurement included two laparoscopic adrenalectomies, one colposuspension, one laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and one liver biopsy. Mean operative time was 321 min (range 230,380), with a mean blood loss of 280 mL (range 150,500). No blood transfusions were required. The left kidney was procured in four cases. The right kidney was obtained on one occasion. Mean hospital stay was 3 days (median 3, range 2,4). No short- or long-term complications have been identified. Mean follow-up time was 2.63 years (median 2.76, range 2.23,2.99). Four of the five kidney recipients were first-time transplants who had not yet started dialysis. Simultaneous surgical interventions at the time of laparoscopic live kidney donation are safe and can be undertaken in selected cases. This practice is beneficial to both the donor and the recipient, and is likely to become more commonplace with changing practice patterns involving donor evaluation and management. [source] | ||||||||||