Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Dose Intensity (dose + intensity)
Selected AbstractsGemcitabine plus epirubicin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for platinum-based regimensCANCER, Issue 7 2002Sergio Ricci M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus epirubicin in previously untreated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were not eligible for cisplatin-based regimens. METHODS Patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and at least one of the following characteristics were eligible: impaired renal function (creatinine clearance < 60 mL per minute), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) , 2, and age , 75 years. The treatment included epirubicin 70 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients entered the study, and a total of 152 cycles were administered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1,6 cycles per patient). The following Grade 3,4 hematologic toxicities were reported (percent of cycles): neutropenia, 22.4%; anemia, 11.2%; and thrombocytopenia, 6.5%. No cardiac, renal, or hepatic toxicities were observed. Dose intensities of epirubicin and gemcitabine were 19.6 mg/m2 per week (84%) and 532.2 mg/m2 per week (80%), respectively. There were 2 complete responses (5.3%), 13 partial responses (34.2%), 11 patients with stable disease (28.9%), and 12 patients with progressive disease (31.6%), for an overall response rate of 39.5% (95% confidence interval, 25.1,55.1). The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 4.8 months and 8.0 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 38%, and the median PFS and OS were 6.4 months and 16.4 months, respectively, in patients with PS 0,1. Thirty patients were symptomatic: Seventeen patients (56.7%) achieved a complete response, and 5 patients (16.7%) achieved a partial symptomatic response. CONCLUSIONS At the doses given in this study, gemcitabine and epirubicin had a good tolerability profile with interesting activity in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were not fit for cisplatin-based regimens. Cancer 2002;95:1444,50. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10860 [source] The changing face of HIV-associated lymphoma: what can we learn about optimal therapy inl the post highly active antiretroviral therapy era?HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 3 2004Alison Clayton Abstract Epidemiological data indicate that the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in HIV positive individuals is related to age and CD4 count (i.e. degree of immunosuppression). The prognosis of patients with HIV-NHL has been shown to be linked to several features including age, stage, modified IPI, prior AIDS diagnosis, CD4 count, immunoblastic pathology, LDH, and HAART use. These features are, as would be expected, a mixture of prognostic factors relating to both the HIV, and to the NHL. Population studies indicate that the incidence of associated (HIV-NHL) may be reducing with the advent of HAART, although not all studies concur. However, most population-based studies have not as yet shown a significant improvement in the survival of patients with HIV-NHL with HAART. The optimal chemotherapy for these patients is unknown, although it is generally accepted that CNS prophylaxis is mandatory. There is currently no good evidence of any survival benefit with increased dose intensity from large RCT. However, it must be borne in mind that the large randomised studies comparing differing dose intensities were undertaken before the advent of effective HAART. There is some evidence that there may be a subset of good prognosis patients who may benefit from more intensive therapy.6 Given that the prognosis of patients with HIV can now be considerably improved with HAART, we cannot necessarily assume that the same results would apply with regard to chemotherapy dose intensity. There is some evidence that there is a survival benefit from the addition of HAART to chemotherapy, although this is retrospective. It is likely, however, that the reason for this is that the HAART improves the prognosis of the patients from their HIV, and therefore reduces the number of patients dying from other HIV-related illnesses whilst in remission from their lymphoma, as was seen in large numbers of patients in the earlier chemotherapy trials. It must not be forgotten that the prognosis of the patient's NHL is intimately linked to their prognosis with respect to the HIV. Although the number of patients with HIV-NHL is currently few, there is a need for more trials of chemotherapy, particularly now in the HAART era, when the prognosis from the point of view of the HIV has improved so much. In particular, the issue of dose intensity needs revisiting for patients whose overall prognosis can be improved by commencing HAART. Patients with HIV-NHL should be managed at specialist centres, and where possible should be managed as part of RCT. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Use of ristocetin cofactor activity in the management of von Willebrand diseaseHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2001B.M. Ewenstein von Willebrand disease (vWD), the most common of the hereditary bleeding disorders, arises from quantitative or qualitative defects in von Willebrand factor (vWF). vWF is a multimeric plasma protein that plays a key role in primary and secondary haemostasis. In the current classification scheme, vWD is divided into six subtypes that are based on the nature of the vWF defect. Therapeutic strategies depend on the accurate identification of these subtypes. In most clinical situations, desmopressin is effective treatment for the great majority of patients with mild (type 1) disease, while replacement therapy with factor VIII/vWF concentrates that contain high levels of vWF activity is required for most type 2 and nearly all type 3 vWD patients. Several factor VIII/vWF replacement products are available, one of which (Humate P) has been approved for the treatment of vWD by the US Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary results of recent studies support the hypothesis that treatment with factor VIII/vWF concentrates based upon the content of vWF activity as reflected in the ristocetin cofactor assay is practicable, safe and efficacious. The establishment of optimal treatment regimens with respect to dose intensity and duration will require further study. [source] The changing face of HIV-associated lymphoma: what can we learn about optimal therapy inl the post highly active antiretroviral therapy era?HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 3 2004Alison Clayton Abstract Epidemiological data indicate that the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in HIV positive individuals is related to age and CD4 count (i.e. degree of immunosuppression). The prognosis of patients with HIV-NHL has been shown to be linked to several features including age, stage, modified IPI, prior AIDS diagnosis, CD4 count, immunoblastic pathology, LDH, and HAART use. These features are, as would be expected, a mixture of prognostic factors relating to both the HIV, and to the NHL. Population studies indicate that the incidence of associated (HIV-NHL) may be reducing with the advent of HAART, although not all studies concur. However, most population-based studies have not as yet shown a significant improvement in the survival of patients with HIV-NHL with HAART. The optimal chemotherapy for these patients is unknown, although it is generally accepted that CNS prophylaxis is mandatory. There is currently no good evidence of any survival benefit with increased dose intensity from large RCT. However, it must be borne in mind that the large randomised studies comparing differing dose intensities were undertaken before the advent of effective HAART. There is some evidence that there may be a subset of good prognosis patients who may benefit from more intensive therapy.6 Given that the prognosis of patients with HIV can now be considerably improved with HAART, we cannot necessarily assume that the same results would apply with regard to chemotherapy dose intensity. There is some evidence that there is a survival benefit from the addition of HAART to chemotherapy, although this is retrospective. It is likely, however, that the reason for this is that the HAART improves the prognosis of the patients from their HIV, and therefore reduces the number of patients dying from other HIV-related illnesses whilst in remission from their lymphoma, as was seen in large numbers of patients in the earlier chemotherapy trials. It must not be forgotten that the prognosis of the patient's NHL is intimately linked to their prognosis with respect to the HIV. Although the number of patients with HIV-NHL is currently few, there is a need for more trials of chemotherapy, particularly now in the HAART era, when the prognosis from the point of view of the HIV has improved so much. In particular, the issue of dose intensity needs revisiting for patients whose overall prognosis can be improved by commencing HAART. Patients with HIV-NHL should be managed at specialist centres, and where possible should be managed as part of RCT. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] The comparison of outcome and cost of three protocols for childhood non-high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in ChinaPEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, Issue 2 2008Xue-Qun Luo MD Abstract Objective To compare the outcome and treatment cost of three protocols for childhood non-high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and evaluate the feasibility of less intensive treatment protocol for low income families. Methods Two hundred forty-three children were newly diagnosed ALL in a university hospital from May 1999 to August 2006. Three protocols were offered to the patients: China-98 protocol, or modified ALLIC BFM2002 protocol, or an in-house Reduced Intensity Protocol (or also known as Economic Protocol). Results Among 243 patients, 19 abandoned treatment, 3 transferred to other hospitals, 48 were high-risk and were treated with the high risk protocol, and 4 had mature B-ALL. A total of 169 cases were enrolled on non-high risk protocols: 46 treated on China-98 protocol, 73 on modified ALLIC BFM2002 and 50 from low income families on Economic Protocol. The event-free survival (EFS) at 4 years was 80.4% (95%CI, 68.8,92.2%), 83.5% (95%CI, 73.5,93.5%), and 72.8% (95%CI, 59.3,86.3%) for China-98 protocol, modified ALLIC BFM2002, and Economic Protocol respectively. The hospitalization costs (range and median) were significantly different between protocols: US$ 8,700,25,500 (12,500), US$ 6,900,16,400 (9,900), US$ 3,100,6,800 (4,300) for China-98 protocol, modified ALLIC BFM2002, and Economic Protocol respectively. Conclusion This report from China has systematically reviewed the outcome and costs of protocols for ALL having different dose intensity. The reduced intensity protocol appears to achieve reasonable EFS (72.8% at 4 years) for non-high risk ALL at a much lower cost. This is especially important for low income families in developing countries. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;51:204,209. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Randomized study comparing 4,-epi-doxorubicin (Epirubicin) versus doxorubicin as a part of induction treatment in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemiaAMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, Issue 4 2002Manisha Bhutani Abstract Doxorubicin or daunorubicin are routinely used to induce remission in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Efficacy of epirubicin (an analog of doxorubicin), however, has not been adequately evaluated in ALL management. This randomized study was undertaken to compare the relative efficacy of epirubicin vs. doxorubicin as part of induction chemotherapy in adult ALL. Between January 1990 and June 1998, 79 previously untreated adult ALL patients (age 11,55 years, median 20 years) were randomized to receive either doxorubicin (Group A, n = 39) or epirubicin (Group B, n = 40) as a part of induction therapy. Vincristine and prednisolone were common in each group. The induction treatment was followed by identical consolidation and maintenance therapy. The two groups were compared as regards pretherapy clinical and laboratory parameters, dose intensity of therapy, therapeutic efficacy, myelotoxicity, and survival. Epirubicin was as effective as doxorubicin in terms of complete remission rate (80% vs. 78.3%; P = 0.87) and relapse rate (57.1% vs. 51.7%; P = 0.68). Five-year overall survival (30% vs. 30%, P = 0.98) and disease-free survival (40% vs. 39%, P = 0.92) at median follow-up of 68 months was also similar in the two groups. The incidence of Grade 4 myelotoxicity was comparable in the two groups. Patients 20 years of age or less had better CR rates (90% vs. 65%; P = 0.011) and median overall survival (39 vs. 11 months; P = 0.008) compared to those who were older. From this study epirubicin appears as effective as doxorubicin as part of induction therapy for adult ALL. However, the results need to be validated on the basis of immunophenotype and cytogenetic prognostic characterization. Am. J. Hematol. 71:241,247, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine and either day 1 or day 8 carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Is thrombocytopenia predictable?ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 1 2009Cathy CROMBIE Abstract Aim: Two 21-day gemcitabine,carboplatin schedules were evaluated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in order to assess the effect of timing of the carboplatin dose on toxicity and efficacy. Methods: Patients were randomized to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) and carboplatin (AUC 5, on day 1) (Carbo d1 arm) or the same gemcitabine schedule with carboplatin given on day 8 (Carbo d8 arm). Twenty patients with Stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in each arm. Results: The achieved dose intensities of both gemcitabine and carboplatin were significantly higher in the Carbo d1 arm. The total rates of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities (any toxicity, any cycle) were 80% and 65%, respectively, with no significant differences between the two arms. Nine patients in the Carbo d1 arm, but only one patient in the Carbo d8 arm, required a platelet transfusion. There were 10 partial responses (four Carbo d1 arm, six Carbo d8 arm), giving an overall response rate of 25% (95% CI 13,41%). Conclusion: Administration of carboplatin on day 8 of this regimen confers no clear advantage compared with day 1 carboplatin, with similar toxicity but lower dose intensity. A formula for the prediction of thrombocytopenia is proposed. [source] A Latent Contingency Table Approach to Dose Finding for Combinations of Two AgentsBIOMETRICS, Issue 3 2009Guosheng Yin Summary Two-agent combination trials have recently attracted enormous attention in oncology research. There are several strong motivations for combining different agents in a treatment: to induce the synergistic treatment effect, to increase the dose intensity with nonoverlapping toxicities, and to target different tumor cell susceptibilities. To accommodate this growing trend in clinical trials, we propose a Bayesian adaptive design for dose finding based on latent 2 × 2 tables. In the search for the maximum tolerated dose combination, we continuously update the posterior estimates for the unknown parameters associated with marginal probabilities and the correlation parameter based on the data from successive patients. By reordering the dose toxicity probabilities in the two-dimensional space, we assign each coming cohort of patients to the most appropriate dose combination. We conduct extensive simulation studies to examine the operating characteristics of the proposed method under various practical scenarios. Finally, we illustrate our dose-finding procedure with a clinical trial of agent combinations at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. [source] Position paper on the therapeutic use of rituximab in CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomaBRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, Issue 1 2003Ruth Pettengell Summary. The available data on rituximab in combination with chemotherapy confirm that the addition of an independently active biological agent to full-dose standard chemotherapy results in higher rates of complete response, lower rates of relapse, prolonged survival, little additional toxicity and no compromise of the dose intensity of standard chemotherapy regardless of age and risk group. Given the strength of these data, the British Committee for Standards in Haematology believes that rituximab should be available for prescription by UK haematologists and oncologists according to its licensed indication in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma until further data are available to confirm or refute these results. We consider that the use of rituximab with chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma is cost-effective and that failure to support its introduction will be strongly in conflict with professional and patient opinion. [source] Vincristine sulfate liposomes injection (Marqibo) in heavily pretreated patients with refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma,CANCER, Issue 15 2009Report of the Pivotal Phase 2 Study Abstract BACKGROUND: Marqibo, a sphingosomal/cholesterol encapsulation of vincristine sulfate has targeted, increased, and sustained delivery of vincristine to tumor tissues. A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, and multinational study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of Marqibo as a single agent in patients with multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: Eligible patients had relapsed or refractory de novo or transformed aggressive NHL and prior treatment with at least 2 multiagent chemotherapy regimens. Marqibo was administered at 2 mg/m2, every 2 weeks, for a maximum of 12 cycles or until toxicity or disease progression. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled and treated on trial. Ninety-six had histological confirmed de novo (N = 89) or transformed (N = 7) aggressive NHL. Median number of cycles was 4 (median dose/cycle 4 mg). Overall response (CR and complete response unconfirmed and PR) was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17, 35), CR and complete response unconfirmed confirmed by external reviewers was 5%. Median overall survival was 6.6 months (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 95% CI, 4.7, 9.8). Grade 3 of 4 neurotoxicity occurred in 32% of patients. All patients had prior neurotoxic agents, and 85% had baseline residual neuropathy symptoms (grades 1-2) from prior treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Marqibo is an active agent in patients with heavily pretreated aggressive NHL, and tolerated at approximately twice the dose intensity of standard vincristine. Its activity supports further investigation as a substitution for vincristine in combination treatment of lymphoid disorders. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. [source] Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantationCANCER, Issue 1 2006Early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. METHODS Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9,68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9,39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9,85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0,65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society. [source] | |||||||||||||||||||