			Home About us Contact

Dosage Schedule (dosage + schedule)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Population pharmacokinetics of ketanserin in pre-eclamptic patients and its association with antihypertensive response

FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 5 2005
Lidwien M. Hanff
Abstract Ketanserin is an antihypertensive drug that is increasingly being used parenterally in the treatment of pre-eclampsia. Because of lack of efficacy in a substantial part of our pre-eclamptic patients, we determined the plasma concentrations of ketanserin in 51 pre-eclamptic patients. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed using the iterative two-stage Bayesian population procedure. The influence of individual pharmacokinetic parameters on antihypertensive response, expressed as the attainment of a diastolic blood pressure ,90 mmHg using ketanserin treatment, was analysed. Almost all plasma concentrations of ketanserin were in or above the therapeutic range. The individual pharmacokinetics of ketanserin in pre-eclamptic patients showed an accurate fit using a three-compartment model. The pharmacokinetic parameters in our pre-eclamptic population were a metabolic clearance (Clm) of 37.9 ± 10.86 L/h and volume of distribution (V1) of 0.544 ± 0.188 L/kg, which is comparable with data from healthy volunteers. Despite a considerable inter-individual variation, no correlation was found between differences in pharmacokinetic parameters and antihypertensive response. We conclude that therapeutic plasma levels can be obtained in pre-eclamptic patients with a fixed dosage schedule of ketanserin and differences in antihypertensive responses within a pre-eclamptic population cannot be attributed to pharmacokinetic differences. [source]

Mesalazine 4 g daily given as prolonged-release granules twice daily and four times daily is at least as effective as prolonged-release tablets four times daily in patients with ulcerative colitis

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 3 2001
Dr. Per G. Farup
Abstract Background High doses of mesalazine usually result in an inconvenient dosage schedule and reduced compliance. The goal of this trial was to compare the effects of mesalazine 4 g daily given as prolonged-release granules in packets of 1 g with that of prolonged-release tablets of 0.5 g. Methods Two hundred twenty-seven patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized to treatment with two packets twice daily (Gr-b.i.d.), 1 packet four times daily (Gr-q.i.d.) or 2 tablets four times daily (Ta-q.i.d.) for 8 weeks. A disease activity index (ulcerative colitis disease activity index; UC-DAI) was calculated, and the granules were defined as noninferior to the tablets if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the differences was more than ,1 UC-DAI score unit. Results Noninferiority of the granules compared with the tablets was demonstrated. The mean improvement in the UC-DAI in the treatment groups Gr-b.i.d., Gr-q.i.d., and Ta-q.i.d. were 3.2, 2.9, and 2.4, respectively; the proportion of complete responders in the three groups 39%, 37%, and 31%, respectively. There were no differences in side effects. Conclusion Mesalazine 4 g daily given as prolonged-release granules twice and four times daily is at least as effective as prolonged-release tablets four times daily in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The patients preferred the twice daily dosing. [source]

RT08 Population PK and PK/PD investigations and Monte Carlo simulations for a rational dosage regimen

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2006
P. L. TOUTAIN
Objective There are several means whereby dosage schedules for clinical use may be set, some more appropriate and scientific than others! The challenge of the 21st century must be for colleagues in the pharmaceutical industry, those serving registration bodies and academic colleagues to pool their expertise with the objective of designing dosage schedules for clinical use, which are based on the application of sound scientific principles appropriate for each drug class. In this Roundtable Session colleagues of international standing will review (a) pharmacological and other sources of variability in the responses to drugs; (b) the advantages and limitations of pre-clinical studies for dose selection; (c) the roles of population PK and population PK/PD together with Monte Carlo simulations in dosage regimen selection; (d) Bayesian approaches to dosage selection and (e) regulatory guidelines on the type and extent of studies required for selecting dosages. There is no unanimity amongst stakeholders on either the principles or the methods underlying dosage schedule design. Dose titration studies have long been the principal means of fixing doses but PK-PD and population PK-PD studies are now challenging more traditional approaches. The papers and discussion in this Roundtable Session will provide a critical basis for future advances in this crucial area of therapeutic drug usage. Getting the doses right means that the patient will receive maximum benefit, in terms of optimal efficacy with minimal toxicity, and hence correct dosing will contribute enormously to animal welfare. [source]

RT09 Bayesian approaches in dosage selection

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2006
D. CONCORDET
Objective There are several means whereby dosage schedules for clinical use may be set, some more appropriate and scientific than others! The challenge of the 21st century must be for colleagues in the pharmaceutical industry, those serving registration bodies and academic colleagues to pool their expertise with the objective of designing dosage schedules for clinical use, which are based on the application of sound scientific principles appropriate for each drug class. In this Roundtable Session colleagues of international standing will review (a) pharmacological and other sources of variability in the responses to drugs; (b) the advantages and limitations of pre-clinical studies for dose selection; (c) the roles of population PK and population PK/PD together with Monte Carlo simulations in dosage regimen selection; (d) Bayesian approaches to dosage selection and (e) regulatory guidelines on the type and extent of studies required for selecting dosages. There is no unanimity amongst stakeholders on either the principles or the methods underlying dosage schedule design. Dose titration studies have long been the principal means of fixing doses but PK-PD and population PK-PD studies are now challenging more traditional approaches. The papers and discussion in this Roundtable Session will provide a critical basis for future advances in this crucial area of therapeutic drug usage. Getting the doses right means that the patient will receive maximum benefit, in terms of optimal efficacy with minimal toxicity, and hence correct dosing will contribute enormously to animal welfare. [source]