Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Dosage Recommendations (dosage + recommendation)
Selected AbstractsAntimicrobial Use in the Treatment of Calf DiarrheaJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 1 2004Peter D. Constable Calves with diarrhea often have small intestinal overgrowth with Escherichia coli bacteria, regardless of the inciting cause for the diarrhea, and 30% of systemically ill calves with diarrhea have bacteremia, predominantly because of E coli. Antimicrobial treatment of diarrheic calves should therefore be focused against E coli in the small intestine and blood, the 2 sites of infection. Fecal bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing is not recommended in calves with diarrhea because fecal bacterial populations do not accurately reflect small intestinal or blood bacterial populations and because the break points for susceptibility test results have not been validated. Antimicrobial efficacy is therefore best evaluated by the clinical response of a number of calves to treatment, with calves randomly assigned to treatment groups. Amoxicillin, chlortetracycline, neomycin, oxytetracycline, streptomycin, sulfachloropyridazine, sulfamethazine, and tetracycline administered PO are currently labeled in the United States for the treatment of calf diarrhea. On the basis of published evidence for the oral administration of these antimicrobial agents, only amoxicillin can be recommended for the treatment of diarrhea. Dosage recommendations are amoxicillin trihydrate (10 mg/kg PO q12h) or amoxicillin trihydrate-clavulanate potassium (12.5 mg combined drug/kg PO q12h) for at least 3 days; the latter constitutes extra-label drug use. Parenteral administration of broad-spectrum ,-lactam antimicrobials,eftiofur (2.2mg/kg IM orSCq12h) and amoxicillin or ampicillin (10 mg/kg IM q12h),rpotentiatedsulfonamides(25 mg/kg IV or IM q24h) is recommended for treating calves with diarrhea and systemic illness; both constitute extra-label drug use. In calves with diarrhea and no systemic illness (normal appetite for milk, no fever), it is recommended that the health of the calf be monitored and that oral or parenteral antimicrobials not be administered. [source] Pharmacokinetics of mesalazine pellets in children with inflammatory bowel diseaseINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 5 2004Heleen Wiersma MD Abstract Mesalazine is a first-line drug in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and is customarily used to induce and maintain remission in mild to moderate disease. In children, pharmacokinetic data are scarce, and dosage recommendations are largely extrapolated from studies in adults. Aim of the study was to obtain the pharmacokinetic profile of a new mesalazine pellet formulation in children with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. A single oral dose of 20 mg/kg mesalazine was administered to 13 patients (age 6,16 years). Serial blood and urine sampling for determination of mesalazine and acetylmesalazine was performed before and during 24 hours following ingestion. Maximum plasma concentration of mesalazine (Cmax) was 1332 ng/mL (geometric mean, geometric coefficient of variation [CV]: 0.57), obtained 3.7 hours (tmax; CV: 0.31) after drug administration. Systemic exposure as determined by area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0,, ) was 8712 ng/ml*h (CV: 0.44). Terminal half-life of elimination of mesalazine was 3.5 hours (t1/2; CV: 1.43). This study presents extensive pharmacokinetic data on mesalazine in children with mild-moderately active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. In comparison with previous experience in adults, pharmacokinetics of mesalazine administered as pellets appear to be similar in both populations. [source] Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of bupropion and its metabolitesBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 2 2007Miia Turpeinen What is already known about this subject ,,There is an ongoing debate regarding the effect of renal impairment on CYP related metabolic activities. ,,The possible effect of renal impairment on hepatic CYP2B6 activity, or on bupropion pharmacokinetics in renally impaired subjects without dialysis treatment has not yet been investigated. What this study adds ,,Bupropion clearance was found to be significantly decreased in patients with renal impairment. ,,This study provides further evidence for interplay between the role of the kidney and liver in drug disposition, and opens novel lines of research with respect to the regulation of CYP2B6. Aims To investigate the effect of kidney disease on bupropion pharmacokinetics and on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6 activity as measured by bupropion hydroxylation. Methods In an open parallel group study, 17 healthy, nonsmoking subjects and 10 patients with impaired kidney function received a single 150 mg oral dose of sustained release bupropion. Plasma concentrations of bupropion and its metabolites were measured for up to 72 h. Subjects were genotyped for the CYP2B6 SNPs 1459 C>T, 785 A>G and 516 G>T. Results Bupropion AUC was 126% higher (P < 0.0001, 95% CI +72%, +180%), Cmax 86% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI +40%, +131%), CL/F 63% lower (P = 0.001, 95% CI ,29%, ,96%), and t1/2 140% longer (P = 0.001, 95% CI +76%, +204%) in renally impaired patients. However, only minor changes were detected in the concentrations of the metabolites. In renally impaired subjects the hydroxybupropion : bupropion AUC ratio was decreased by 66% (P = < 0.0001, 95% CI ,19%, ,114%) and the hydrobupropion : bupropion AUC ratio by 69% (P = 0.001, 95% CI +8%, ,146%) compared with controls. Conclusions The CL/F of bupropion was significantly lower in subjects with renal impairment. Because the principal metabolites of bupropion possess similar pharmacological activity to the parent compound, dosage recommendations for patients with renal impairment cannot be given. A direct effect of renal impairment on CYP2B6 activity could not be demonstrated by the present study design. [source] The use and therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin in the UKCLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, Issue 1 2004E. S. R. Darley Abstract Teicoplanin dosage recommendations for specific infections have been modified in recent years. However, there was no significant increase in the proportion of pre-dose concentrations >,20 mg/L between 1994 and 1998 in samples sent for teicoplanin assay at the Regional Antimicrobial Reference Laboratory, Bristol, UK. A questionnaire on the use of teicoplanin and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was sent to all UK National External Quality Assurance Scheme antibiotic assay users. Teicoplanin was widely used in the UK, although vancomycin was more popular as a choice of glycopeptide. Fewer than 25% recommended teicoplanin TDM during routine use, the main reasons being perceived lack of toxicity and lack of evidence for the use of teicoplanin TDM. Pre-dose concentrations <,20 mg/L were considered appropriate for treatment of bacteraemia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by 53% of those responding. Data sheet advice was relied upon more than TDM as an indication of therapeutic dosing. Microbiologists who mainly used vancomycin tended to perform more TDM and seek higher serum concentrations when using teicoplanin than those who preferentially used teicoplanin. [source] Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in kidney transplantation using 12-month exposure, efficacy, and safety dataCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2005Marc I Lorber Abstract:, The aims of the current study were to determine whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) might benefit kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus, and to establish dosage recommendations when everolimus is used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The analysis was based on data from 779 patients enrolled in two 12-month trials. Everolimus trough concentrations ,3 ng/mL were associated with a reduced incidence in biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in the first month (p = 0.0001) and the first 6 months (p = 0.0001), and reduced graft loss compared with lower concentrations (4% vs. 20%, respectively). By contrast, cyclosporine in the standard concentration range had no impact on BPAR within the same timeframes. Most patients receiving everolimus 1.5 or 3 mg/d achieved trough concentrations above the therapeutic threshold of 3 ng/mL, regardless of reductions in cyclosporine dose. TDM simulation showed that just two dose adjustments would achieve median everolimus trough values ,3 ng/mL in 95% of patients during the first 6 months. This investigation indicates that improved efficacy is likely when TDM is considered as an integral component of the immunosuppressive strategy of everolimus. [source] | ||||||||||