Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Defibrillator Therapy (defibrillator + therapy)
Selected AbstractsDefibrillator Therapies in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Too Many Swings at Bad Pitches?JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2007SUSAN S. KIM M.D. [source] Predictors of All-Cause Mortality for Patients with Chronic Chagas' Heart Disease Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator TherapyJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2007AUGUSTO CARDINALLI-NETO M.D., Ph.D. Background: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD) have sporadically been used in the treatment of either Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) or Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) in Chagas' disease patients. This study aimed at determining predictors of all-cause mortality for Chagas' disease patients receiving ICD therapy. Methods and Results: Ninety consecutive patients were entered the study. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 47 ± 13%. Twenty-five (28%) patients had no left ventricular systolic dysfunction. After device implantation, all patients were given amiodarone (mean daily dose = 331, 1 ± 153,3 mg), whereas a B-Blocking agent was given to 37 (40%) out of 90 patients. Results: A total of 4,274 arrhythmias were observed on stored electrogram in 64 (71%) out of 90 patients during the study period; SVT was observed in 45 out of 64 (70%) patients, and VF in 19 (30%) out of 64 patients. Twenty-six (29%) out of 90 patients had no arrhythmia. Fifty-eight (64%) out of 90 patients received appropriate shock, whereas Antitachycardia Pacing was delivered to 58 (64%) out of 90 patients. There were 31 (34%) deaths during the study period. Five patients were lost to follow up. Sudden cardiac death affected 2 (7%) out of 26 patients, whereas pump failure death was detected in the remaining 24 (93%) patients. Number of shocks per patient per 30 days was the only independent predictor of mortality. Conclusion: Number of shocks per patient per 30 days predicts outcome in Chagas' disease patients treated with ICD. [source] Clinical Course and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Postinfarction Women with Severe Left Ventricular DysfunctionJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2005Ph.D. , WOJCIECH ZAREBA M.D. Background: There are limited data regarding implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in postinfarction women with severe left ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of cardiac events and effects of ICD therapy in women as compared to men enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II). Methods and Results: Among 1,232 patients enrolled in MADIT II, there were 192 (16%) women and 1,040 (84%) men. When compared to men, women had an increased frequency of NYHA class ,II (70 vs 63%; P = 0.067), hypertension (60% vs 52%; P = 0.047), diabetes (42% vs 34%; P = 0.027), and LBBB (25% vs 17%; P = 0.011), and less frequent CABG surgery (42% vs 60%; P < 0.001). The 2-year cumulative mortality in patients randomized to conventional therapy was not significantly different in women and men (30% and 20%, respectively; P = 0.19). Adjusting for relevant clinical covariates, the hazard ratios for ICD effectiveness were similar in women (0.57; 95% CI = 0.28,1.18; P = 0.132) and men (0.66; 95% CI = 0.48,0.91; P = 0.011). The risk of appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF was lower in women than in men (hazard ratio = 0.60 for female vs male gender; 95% CI = 0.37,0.98; P = 0.039). Conclusions: MADIT II women had similar mortality and similar ICD effectiveness when compared to men. MADIT II women with ICDs had a lower risk of arrhythmic events with fewer episodes of ventricular tachycardia than men. [source] Interaction of Implantable Defibrillator Therapy with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Deletion/Insertion PolymorphismJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2004MANINDER S. BEDI M.D. Introduction: The angiotensin-converting enzyme deletion allele (ACE D) decreases survival in patients with advanced heart failure. Whether the adverse impact on survival reflects an increased risk of pump failure or arrhythmic sudden death remains uncertain. If the ACE D genotype increases the risk of sudden death, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy should diminish its negative impact. We sought to evaluate the effect of ICD therapy on ACE D genetic risk. Methods and Results: The Genetic Risk Assessment of Cardiac Events (GRACE) study enrolled 479 patients at the University of Pittsburgh between 1996 and 2001. Blood was genotyped for the ACE D/I (deletion/insertion) polymorphism. Of the 479 patients, 82 (77% male, 84% Caucasian, age 56 ± 11 years, 60% ischemic, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.23 ± 0.08) received an ICD and were selected for outcomes analysis (mean follow-up 871 ± 538 days). Transplant-free survival and survival alone were compared in ACE DD patients (n = 24, 29%) versus ACE DI/II patients (n = 58, 71%). Survival was significantly improved in ACE DI/II patients compared to those without an ICD (1 year: 93% vs 87%; 2 year: 89% vs 77%; P = 0.02) but not in ACE DD patients. Transplant-free survival among patients with an ICD was significantly worse in ACE DD versus ACE DI/II (1 year: 67% vs 88%, 2 year: 55% vs 80%, P = 0.03). Analysis of survival as a single endpoint revealed a similar result (1 year = 78% vs 94%; 2 year: 72% vs 88%; P = 0.05). ICD telemetry data showed a nonsignificant trend toward fewer individuals with arrhythmias in the ACE-DD group (46% vs 65%, P = 0.22) Conclusion: ICDs do not diminish the adverse influence of the ACE DD genotype on survival. This finding suggests that mortality in this high-risk genetic subset of patients is due to progression of heart failure rather than arrhythmic sudden death. [source] Analysis of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) TrialJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2003RICHARD C. KLEIN M.D. Introduction: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is commonly used to treat patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Arrhythmia recurrence rates in these patients are high, but which patients will receive a therapy and the forms of arrhythmia recurrence (VT or VF) are poorly understood. Methods and Results: The therapy delivered by the ICD was examined in 449 patients randomized to ICD therapy in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial. Events triggering ICD shocks or antitachycardia pacing (ATP) were reviewed for arrhythmia diagnosis, clinical symptoms, activity at the onset of the arrhythmia, and appropriateness and results of therapy. Both shock and ATP therapies were frequent by 2 years, with 68% of patients receiving some therapy or having an arrhythmic death. An appropriate shock was delivered in 53% of patients, and ATP was delivered in 68% of patients who had ATP activated. The first arrhythmia treated in follow-up was diagnosed as VT (63%), VF (13%), supraventricular tachycardia (18%), unknown arrhythmia (3%), or due to ICD malfunction or inappropriate sensing (3%). Acceleration of an arrhythmia by the ICD occurred in 8% of patients who received any therapy. No physical activity consistently preceded arrhythmias, nor did any single clinical factor predict the symptoms of the arrhythmia. Conclusion: Delivery of ICD therapy in AVID patients was common, primarily due to VT. Inappropriate ICD therapy occurred frequently. Use of ICD therapy as a surrogate endpoint for death in clinical trials should be avoided. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 940-948, September 2003) [source] Improved Survival of Cardiac Transplantation Candidates with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy:JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2003Role of Beta-Blocker or Amiodarone Treatment Introduction: Survival in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is poor due to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. The potential role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in this group of patients has been the subject of increasing interest. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether ICDs improve the survival rate of patients on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation and whether any improvement is independent of concomitant beta-blocker or amiodarone therapy. Methods and Results: Data comprised findings from 310 consecutive patients at a single center who were evaluated and deemed suitable for cardiac transplantation and placed on the waiting list. Kaplan-Meier actuarial approach was used for survival analysis. Survival analysis censored patients at time of transplantation or death. Of the 310 patients, 111 (35.8%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and 164 (52.9%) died while waiting; 35 patients remain on the waiting list. Fifty-nine (19%) patients had ICD placement for ventricular arrhythmias prior to or after being listed. Twenty-nine (49.1%) ICD patients survived until cardiac transplantation, 13 (22%) patients died, and 17 (28.8%) remain on the waiting list. Among non-ICD patients, 82 (32.7%) received transplants, 151 (60.2%) died, and 18 (7.2%) remain on the waiting list. Survival rates at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were better for all ICD patients compared to non-ICD patients (log-rankx2, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, ICD therapy and beta-blocker treatment were the strongest predictors of survival. Further, ICD treatment was associated with improved survival independent of concomitant treatment with beta-blocker or amiodarone. Among ICD and non-ICD patients treated with a beta-blocker or amiodarone, survivals at the 1 and 4 years were 93% vs 69% and 57% vs 32%, respectively (log-rankx2, P = 0.003). Conclusion: ICD therapy is associated with improved survival in high-risk cardiac transplant candidates, and ICD benefit appears to be independent of concomitant treatment. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 578-583, June 2003) [source] Inappropriate Defibrillator Therapy in Young Patients: Are Dual-Chamber Devices and Complex Algorithms Necessary?JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2001SUSAN P. ETHERIDGE M.D. [source] Implantable Defibrillator Therapy in Naxos DiseasePACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2000KOSTAS GATZOULIS Naxos disease is a unique form of right ventricular cardiomyopathy with a high prevalence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias, including sudden cardiac death. As a hereditary systemic disease confined to a small island, it has been closely studied over the last 15 years. The implantation of an automatic defibrillator provides an alternative form of antiarrhythmic management to improve life expectancy in these high risk cardiac patients. We present the first two Naxos disease patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias who had defibrillator implantation. [source] Clinical Course and Risk Stratification of Patients Affected with the Jervell and Lange-Nielsen SyndromeJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2006ILAN GOLDENBERG M.D. Introduction: Data regarding risk factors and clinical course of patients affected with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS), an autosomal recesssive form of the congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS), are limited to several reported cases and a retrospective analysis. Methods and Results: We prospectively followed-up 44 JLNS patients from the U.S. portion of the International LQTS Registry and compared their clinical course with 2,174 patients with the phenotypically determined dominant form of LQTS (Romano-Ward syndrome [RWS]) and a subgroup of 285 patients with type 1 LQTS (LQT1). Mean (±SD) corrected QT interval (QTc) in the JLNS, RWS, and LQT1 groups were 548 ± 73, 500 ± 48, and 502 ± 46 msec, respectively (P < 0.001). The cumulative rates of cardiac events from birth through age 40 among JLNS and RWS patients were 93% (mean [±SD] age: 5.0 ± 7.0 years) and 54% (mean [±SD] age: 14.2 ± 9.3 years), respectively (P < 0.001). The JLNS:RWS and JLNS:LQT1 adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for cardiac events were highest among patients with a baseline QTc ,550 msec (HR = 15.83 [P < 0.001] and 13.80 [P < 0.001], respectively). Among JLNS patients treated with beta-blockers, the cumulative probability of LQTS-related death was 35%; defibrillator therapy was associated with a 0% mortality rate during a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 4.9 ± 3.4 years. Conclusions: Patients with JLNS experience a high rate of cardiac and fatal events from early childhood despite medical therapy. Defibrillator therapy appears to improve outcome in this high-risk population, although longer follow-up is needed to establish its long-term efficacy. [source] Long-Term Incidence of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia and Shock Therapy in Patients with Primary Defibrillator Implantation Does Not Differ from Event Rates in Patients Treated for Survived Cardiac ArrestJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2005ULRICH BACKENKÖHLER M.D. Introduction: Recent trials have demonstrated benefit of prophylactic defibrillator (ICD) implantation compared to conventional treatment in high-risk patients. However, many patients have rare or no sustained arrhythmias following implantation. Our study addresses the question, whether patients with prophylactic defibrillator implantation have a lower risk for life-threatening ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) compared to sudden cardiac death (SCD) survivors. Methods and Results: Over 7 years we enrolled 245 patients. Occurrence of spontaneous sustained VT/VF resulting in adequate ICD treatment was the endpoint. Incidence, type, and treatment of sustained arrhythmia in 43 previously asymptomatic ICD recipients (group B) were compared to data of 202 survivors of imminent SCD (group A). All patients had severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (<45%). Group B patients had long runs (>6 cycles, <30 s) of VT during Holter monitoring and inducible sustained arrhythmia. Incidence of rapid VT and VF (cycle length <240 ms/heart rate >250 bpm) after 4 years (35% in both groups, P = ns) and adequate defibrillator therapies (57% vs 55%, P = ns) were similar in both groups after univariate and multivariate analysis. Cumulative mortality tended to be lower in group B compared to group A, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: During long-term follow-up, incidence of sustained rapid ventricular arrhythmia in prophylactically treated patients is as high as that of SCD survivors. Benefit from defibrillator implantation for primary prevention (group B) appears to be comparable to that for survived cardiac arrest (group A). [source] A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities IndexHEALTH ECONOMICS, Issue 11 2003Bernie J. O'Brien Abstract Background: The SF-6D is a new health state classification and utility scoring system based on 6 dimensions (,6D') of the Short Form 36, and permits a "bridging" transformation between SF-36 responses and utilities. The Health Utilities Index, mark 3 (HUI3) is a valid and reliable multi-attribute health utility scale that is widely used. We assessed within-subject agreement between SF-6D utilities and those from HUI3. Methods: Patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death and participating in a randomized trial of implantable defibrillator therapy completed both instruments at baseline. Score distributions were inspected by scatterplot and histogram and mean score differences compared by paired t -test. Pearson correlation was computed between instrument scores and also between dimension scores within instruments. Between-instrument agreement was by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: SF-6D and HUI3 forms were available from 246 patients. Mean scores for HUI3 and SF-6D were 0.61 (95% CI 0.60,0.63) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.54,0.62) respectively; a difference of 0.03 (p<0.03). Score intervals for HUI3 and SF-6D were (-0.21 to 1.0) and (0.30,0.95). Correlation between the instrument scores was 0.58 (95% CI 0.48,0.68) and agreement by ICC was 0.42 (95% CI 0.31,0.52). Correlations between dimensions of SF-6D were higher than for HUI3. Conclusions: Our study casts doubt on the whether utilities and QALYs estimated via SF-6D are comparable with those from HUI3. Utility differences may be due to differences in underlying concepts of health being measured, or different measurement approaches, or both. No gold standard exists for utility measurement and the SF-6D is a valuable addition that permits SF-36 data to be transformed into utilities to estimate QALYs. The challenge is developing a better understanding as to why these classification-based utility instruments differ so markedly in their distributions and point estimates of derived utilities. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Obesity As a Risk Factor for Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in MADIT II PatientsJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2007GRZEGORZ PIETRASIK M.D. Background: Obesity, as defined by body mass index ,30 kg/m2, has been shown to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, data on the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden death by BMI in patients after myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Methods: The risk of appropriate defibrillator therapy for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) by BMI status was analyzed in 476 nondiabetic patients with left ventricular dysfunction who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-II (MADIT II). Results: Mean BMI was 27 ± 5 kg/m2. Obese patients comprised 25% of the study population. After 2 years of follow-up, the cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF were 39% in obese and 24% in nonobese patients, respectively (P = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, there was a significant 64% increase in the risk for appropriate ICD therapy among obese patients as compared with nonobese patients, which was attributed mainly to an 86% increase in the risk of appropriate ICD shocks (P = 0.006). Consistent with these results, the risk of the combined endpoint of appropriate VT/VF therapy or sudden cardiac death (SCD) was also significantly increased among obese patients (Hazard Ratio 1.59; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that in nondiabetic patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, a BMI ,30 kg/m2 is an independent risk factor for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. [source] Clinical Course and Risk Stratification of Patients Affected with the Jervell and Lange-Nielsen SyndromeJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2006ILAN GOLDENBERG M.D. Introduction: Data regarding risk factors and clinical course of patients affected with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS), an autosomal recesssive form of the congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS), are limited to several reported cases and a retrospective analysis. Methods and Results: We prospectively followed-up 44 JLNS patients from the U.S. portion of the International LQTS Registry and compared their clinical course with 2,174 patients with the phenotypically determined dominant form of LQTS (Romano-Ward syndrome [RWS]) and a subgroup of 285 patients with type 1 LQTS (LQT1). Mean (±SD) corrected QT interval (QTc) in the JLNS, RWS, and LQT1 groups were 548 ± 73, 500 ± 48, and 502 ± 46 msec, respectively (P < 0.001). The cumulative rates of cardiac events from birth through age 40 among JLNS and RWS patients were 93% (mean [±SD] age: 5.0 ± 7.0 years) and 54% (mean [±SD] age: 14.2 ± 9.3 years), respectively (P < 0.001). The JLNS:RWS and JLNS:LQT1 adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for cardiac events were highest among patients with a baseline QTc ,550 msec (HR = 15.83 [P < 0.001] and 13.80 [P < 0.001], respectively). Among JLNS patients treated with beta-blockers, the cumulative probability of LQTS-related death was 35%; defibrillator therapy was associated with a 0% mortality rate during a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 4.9 ± 3.4 years. Conclusions: Patients with JLNS experience a high rate of cardiac and fatal events from early childhood despite medical therapy. Defibrillator therapy appears to improve outcome in this high-risk population, although longer follow-up is needed to establish its long-term efficacy. [source] Cigarette Smoking and the Risk of Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in High-Risk Cardiac Patients with Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2006ILAN GOLDENBERG M.D. Introduction: Nicotine elevates serum catecholamine concentration and is therefore potentially arrhythmogenic. However, the effect of cigarette smoking on arrhythmic risk in coronary heart disease patients is not well established. Methods and Results: The risk of appropriate and inappropriate defibrillator therapy by smoking status was analyzed in 717 patients who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-II. Compared with patients who had quit smoking before study entry (past smokers) and patients who had never smoked (never smokers), patients who continued smoking (current smokers) were significantly younger and generally had more favorable baseline clinical characteristics. Despite this, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for appropriate ICD therapy for fast ventricular tachycardia (at heart rates ,180 b.p.m) or ventricular fibrillation was highest among current smokers (HR = 2.11 [95% CI 1.11,3.99]) and intermediate among past smokers (HR = 1.57 [95% CI 0.95,2.58]), as compared with never smokers (P for trend = 0.02). Current smokers also exhibited a higher risk of inappropriate ICD shocks (HR = 2.93 [95% CI 1.30,6.63]) than past (HR = 1.91 [95% CI 0.97,3.77]) and never smokers (P for trend = 0.008). Conclusions: In patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, continued cigarette smoking is associated with a significant increase in the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and inappropriate ICD shocks induced by rapid supraventricular arrhythmias. Our findings stress the importance of complete smoking cessation in this high-risk population. [source] Exercise is Superior to Pacing for T Wave Alternans Measurement in Subjects with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular DysfunctionJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2002ERIC J. RASHBA M.D. Exercise vs Pacing for TWA Measurement.Introduction: T wave alternans (TWA) is a heart rate-dependent marker of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. Atrial pacing and exercise both are used as provocative stimuli to elicit TWA. However, the prognostic value of the two testing methods has not been compared. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the prognostic value of TWA measured during bicycle exercise and atrial pacing in a large cohort of high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Methods and Results: This was a prospective study of 251 patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who were referred for electrophysiologic studies (EPS) for standard clinical indications. Patients underwent TWA testing using bicycle ergometry (exercise TWA, n = 144) and/or atrial pacing (pacing TWA, n = 178). The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. The predictive value of exercise and pacing TWA for EPS results and for endpoint events was determined. Exercise and pacing TWA both were significant predictors of EPS results (odds ratios 3.0 and 2.9 respectively, P < 0.02). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the primary endpoint revealed that exercise TWA was a significant predictor of events (hazard ratio 2.2, P = 0.03). In contrast, pacing TWA had no prognostic value for endpoint events (hazard ratio 1.1, P = 0.8). Conclusion: TWA should be measured during exercise when it is used for clinical risk stratification. EPS results may not be an adequate surrogate for spontaneous events when evaluating new risk stratification tests. [source] Usefulness of Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level at Implant in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Advanced But Stable Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 11 2009Aiman El-Saed MD Abstract Background Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level has emerged as a predictor of death and hospital readmission in patients with heart failure (HF). The value of baseline BNP assessment in advanced HF patients receiving cardiac resynchronization defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) has not been firmly established. Hypothesis We hypothesized that a baseline BNP level would predict all cause mortality and HF hospitalization in HF patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients having BNP assessment prior to implantation of a CRT-D for standard indications during 2004 and 2005 was conducted at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint was HF-related hospitalization. We used findings from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to define low (<492 pg/mL) and high (,492 pg/mL) BNP groups. Results Out of 173 CRT-D recipients, 115 patients (mean age 67.0 ± 10.7 years, New York Heart Association [NYHA] class 2.9 ± 0.3, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 22.5% ± 9.6%, QRS 148.3 ± 30.4 ms) had preimplantation BNP measured (mean 559 ± 761 pg/mL and median 315 pg/mL). During a mean follow-up time of 17.5 ± 6.5 mo, 27 deaths (23.5%) and 31 HF hospitalizations (27.0%) were recorded. Compared to those with low BNP (n = 74), those of high BNP (n = 41) were older, had lower LVEF, higher creatinine levels, suffered more deaths, and HF hospitalizations. In multivariate regression models, higher BNP remained a significant predictor of both the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06,7.88, p = 0.038) and secondary endpoint (HR: 4.23, 95% CI: 1.68,10.60, p = 0.002). Conclusions Baseline BNP independently predicted mortality and HF hospitalization in a predominantly older white male population of advanced HF patients receiving CRT-D. Elevated BNP levels may identify a vulnerable HF population with a particularly poor prognosis despite CRT-D. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||