Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Days Posttransplant (day + posttransplant)
Selected AbstractsDelayed Introduction of Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus, and Renal Function in Liver Transplantation: The ,ReSpECT' StudyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009J. M. Neuberger We report a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial investigating the effect of lower levels and delayed introduction of tacrolimus on renal function in liver transplant recipients. Adult patients with good renal function undergoing primary liver transplant were randomized to either: group A (standard-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels >10 ng/mL] and corticosteroids; n = 183); group B (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] 2g/day, reduced-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels ,8 ng/mL], and corticosteroids; n = 170); group C (daclizumab induction, MMF, reduced-dose tacrolimus delayed until the fifth day posttransplant and corticosteroids, n = 172). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 52 weeks. The eGFR decreased by 23.61, 21.22 and 13.63 mL/min in groups A, B and C, respectively (A vs C, p = 0.012; A vs B, p = 0.199). Renal dialysis was required less frequently in group C versus group A (4.2% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.037). Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 27.6%, 29.2% and 19.0%, respectively. Patient and graft survival was similar. In conclusion, daclizumab induction, MMF, corticosteroids and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus was associated with less nephrotoxicity than therapy with standard-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids without compromising efficacy or tolerability. [source] Hepatorenal syndrome: A proposal for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT)LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2007Richard Ruiz Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a well-recognized complication of end-stage liver disease. Once thought to be a reversible condition with liver transplantation (LT) alone, HRS may directly contribute to the requirement for long-term dialysis posttransplant. As a result, discussion has now focused on whether or when a kidney allograft should be considered for these patients. Using the International Ascites Club guidelines with a pretransplant serum creatinine (SCr) >2.0 mg/dL to define HRS, 130 patients undergoing LT over a 10-yr period were identified, for an overall incidence of 9%. Patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were 74%, and 68%, and 62%, respectively. Survival was significantly worse when compared to non-HRS patients undergoing LT over the same study period (P = 0.0001). For patients presenting with type 2 HRS, 7 patients (6%) developed irreversible kidney failure posttransplant compared to 0.34% in the non-HRS population (P < 0.0001). Five of these patients died within 1 yr with a median survival time of 139 days. Combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) for patients with HRS is not recommended. However, an improvement in outcome can be accomplished by addressing those patients who require dialysis greater than 60 days posttransplant. We propose a role for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT) in select HRS patients. Liver Transpl 13:838,843, 2007. © 2007 AASLD. [source] Is the Cost of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Higher Than Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation?LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2004Mark W. Russo MD Background An important long-term consideration for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation. LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluation, donor surgery, and postoperative donor care must be included in a cost analysis for LDLT. In this study, we compare the comprehensive cost of LDLT with that of cadaveric-liver transplantation. Methods All costs for medical services provided at our institution were recorded for 24 LDLT and 43 cadaveric recipients with greater than 1 year follow-up transplanted between August 1997 and April 2000. The donor costs include donors evaluated and rejected, donors evaluated and accepted, donor right hepatectomy costs, and donor follow-up costs (365 days postdonation). LDLT and cadaveric recipient costs include medical care 90 days pre-LDLT, recipient transplant costs, and recipient follow-up costs (365 days posttransplant) including retransplantation. Cost is expressed as an arbitrary cost unit (CU) that is a value between $500 to $1,500. Results Total LDLT costs (evaluations of rejected donors + evaluations of accepted donors + donor hepatectomy + donor follow-up care for 1 year + pretransplant recipient care [90 days pretransplant] + recipient transplantation + recipient 1-year posttransplant care)= 162.7 CU. Total mean cadaveric transplant costs (pretransplant recipient care [90 days pretransplant] + recipient transplantation [including organ acquisition cost] + recipient 1-year posttransplant care)=134.5 CU, (P = ns) Conclusions The total comprehensive cost of LDLT is 21% higher than cadaveric transplantation, although this difference is not significant. (Transplantation 2003;75:473,476.) [source] Analysis of Subcutaneous (SQ) Alemtuzumab Induction Therapy in Highly Sensitized Patients Desensitized With IVIG and RituximabAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2008A. A. Vo Here we report on our experience with subcutaneous (SQ) Alemtuzumab in an uncontrolled study in highly HLA-sensitized patients (HS). From 3/05,4/07, 54 HS patients received Alemtuzumab 30 mg SQ as induction. Patient and graft survival, AR episodes, serum creatinines, absolute lymphocyte counts, monthly PCR monitoring for viruses, AE/SAEs and infectious complications were monitored. No patient to date has developed acute injection-related reactions after SQ Alemtuzumab; however, bone marrow suppression was occasionally seen requiring reduction or elimination of mycophenolate mofetil approximately 1,2 months posttransplant. Patient and graft survival at 12 M was 98%/96%, respectively. AR episodes occurred in 35% with 20% being C4d+ AMR. Mean SCrs at 12 M were 1.4 ± 0.3 mg/dL. The nadir ALC was 0.17 ± 0.19 within 24 h and sustained up to 365 days posttransplant. Infections occurred in eight patients (five with polyoma BK viremia [PBK], one CMV/PBK and two CMV viremia). SQ Alemtuzumab was well tolerated and resulted in prolonged lymphocyte depletion. Compared to our previous experience with daclizumab and rabbit ATG induction in HS patients, single-dose SQ Alemtuzumab was more cost effective, showed similar infection rates and did not reduce the AMR rates posttransplant. Although uncontrolled, these observations suggest that induction therapy with Alemtuzumab appears feasible and indeed promising, but awaits more definitive study. [source] | ||||||||||