Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Additional Pathology (additional + pathology)
Selected AbstractsSentinel node in head and neck cancer: Use of size criterion to upstage the no neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 2 2007Lee W. T. Alkureishi MBChB Abstract Background. Anatomical imaging tools demonstrate poor sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients with clinically node-negative necks (cN0). This study evaluates nodal size as a staging criterion for detection of cervical metastases, utilizing sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and additional pathology (step-serial sectioning, SSS; and immunohistochemistry, IHC). Methods. Sixty-five patients with clinically N0 disease underwent SNB, with a mean of 2.4 nodes excised per patient. Nodes were fixed in formalin, bisected, and measured in 3 axes before hematoxylin-eosin staining. Negative nodes were subjected to SSS and IHC. SNB-positive patients underwent modified radical neck dissection. Results. Maximum diameter was larger in levels II and III (13.1 and 13.2 mm) when compared with level I (10.5 mm; p = .004, p = .018), while minimum diameter was constant. Positive nodes were larger than negative nodes (p = .007), but nodes found positive by SSS/IHC were not significantly larger than negative nodes for either measurement (p = .433). Sensitivity and specificity were poor for all measurements. Conclusions. Nodal size is an inaccurate predictor of nodal metastases and should not be regarded as an accurate means of staging the clinically N0 neck. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2006 [source] Routine colonic mucosal biopsy and ileoscopy increases diagnostic yield in patients undergoing colonoscopy for diarrheaJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 3 2002IAN F YUSOFF Abstract Background and Aims: In patients undergoing colonoscopy for diarrhea, when the examination is normal, the role of routine mucosal biopsy remains controversial, particularly in the open-access setting. It is uncertain whether routine ileoscopy adds anything to colonoscopy alone. We aimed to assess the yield of mucosal biopsy and ileoscopy in patients with diarrhea. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all colonoscopies performed for diarrhea over a 9-year period in a tertiary referral center with an open-access service. We then selected cases where the examination was normal and biopsies were performed. The histopathology reports of these selected cases were then reviewed. Results There were 1131 cases identified. The mucosal examination was normal in 465 cases (41%); 362 of these had colonic biopsies performed. Histology was normal in 316 cases (87%) and was non-specific in 28 cases (8%). Significant histopathology was present in 18 cases (5%) with a significantly higher prevalence of microscopic colitis in patients above 60 years old. Ileoscopy was performed in 508 cases and was abnormal in 26 cases (5%). The abnormality on ileoscopy was the sole abnormality in 13 cases (3%). Conclusions Routine colonic mucosal biopsy and ileoscopy each identify significant additional pathology in 5% of cases when investigating patients with diarrhea, and are recommended as routine practice in this setting. We found ileal biopsy unhelpful when ileoscopy was normal. © 2002 Blackwell Science Asia Pty Ltd [source] Prognostic endovascular scoring is useful for the assessment of patients with additional pathologyANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 12 2009Andy Strickland B Med Sci, FRACS MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Is microscopic haematuria a urological emergency?BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2002M.A. Khan Objective ,To determine the prevalence of urological pathology in a retrospective and prospective study of patients with microscopic haematuria attending a haematuria clinic. Patients and methods ,Between January 1998 and May 2001, 781 patients attended the haematuria clinic; of these, 368 (47%; median age 60 years, range 18,90) had a history of microscopic haematuria, as detected by urine dipstick testing. These patients were investigated by urine culture and cytology, renal ultrasonography, intravenous urography (IVU), flexible cystoscopy, urea and electrolyte analysis, and assay of prostate specific antigen (PSA) where appropriate. Results ,Urine cytology showed no malignant cells in any patient with a history of microscopic haematuria. In 143 patients (39%), urine cytology showed no red blood cells and all other investigations were normal. Of the remaining 225 patients, IVU showed a tumour in one (bladder), renal stones in 15 and an enlarged prostate in two. Renal ultrasonography detected no additional pathology. Urine analysis showed one urinary tract infection. Flexible cystoscopy detected five patients with a bladder tumour (all G1pTa), two urethral strictures, five bladder stones and enlarged prostates, six enlarged prostates only, and nine red patches in the bladder, showing one patient with carcinoma in situ . No PSA levels were suggestive of prostate cancer. Conclusion ,Patients with dipstick-positive haematuria should be re-assessed by urine microscopy before referral. As only 1.4% of patients had a malignant pathology (all noninvasive), microscopic haematuria should be regarded as a separate entity from macroscopic haematuria, and such patients do not need to be referred urgently. [source] Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 12 2004K. H. in't Hof Background: Surgery for pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen remains a clinical dilemma. This prospective study assessed the accuracy of preoperative unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Methods: One hundred and three adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis underwent unenhanced helical CT of the abdomen. Subsequently, all patients underwent laparoscopic inspection of the abdominal cavity by a surgeon who was blinded to the diagnosis suggested by CT. Patients underwent appropriate surgical therapy accordingly. Follow-up was at least 6 weeks. Results: Appendicitis was diagnosed by CT in 83 patients (80·6 per cent). Acute appendicitis was identified during laparoscopy in 87 patients (84·5 per cent). Prospective interpretation of CT images yielded a sensitivity of 95·4 per cent and a specificity of 100 per cent for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. There were four false-negative scans. In 12 of 20 patients without signs of appendicitis on CT, the scan established the presence of other pathology. At operation no additional pathology was observed in this group and all other diagnoses proved to be correct. Conclusion: Plain helical CT in patients with suspected acute appendicitis provides an accurate diagnosis without the disadvantages of contrast enhancement. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] | ||||||||||