Home About us Contact | |||
DDD Pacemaker (ddd + pacemaker)
Selected AbstractsUnexpected Ventricular Asystole in a DDD Pacemaker: What is the Mechanism?PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2002STÉPHANE GARRIGUE No abstract is available for this article. [source] Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following PneumothoraxPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001CHRÍSTOPHE MELZER MELZER, C., et al.: Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Pneumothorax. This case report describes a transient pacemaker exit block due to subcutaneous emphysema following pneumothorax. Pneumothorax after pacemaker implantation is rare, but development of subcutaneous emphysema under such circumstances is even more uncommon. Exit block develops only with the use of unipolar leads; with implantation of bipolar leads, this complication cannot occur. [source] Cardiac arrest related to coronary spasm in patients with variant angina: a three-case studyJOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2002W. Seniuk We present three patients with variant angina pectoris and episodes of cardiac arrest. All of them had typical clinical symptoms, ST-segment changes in electrocardiogram, and coronary artery spasm confirmed by arteriography. They were treated with high doses of calcium antagonists and nitrates. An automatic cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in the patient who developed ventricular fibrillation despite therapy with calcium antagonists. In another patient a DDD pacemaker was implanted because of high-degree atrioventricular block. [source] Pacemaker Lead Endocarditis Caused by Staphylococcus HominisPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2006MUSTAFA SUNBUL Infective endocarditis related to pacemaker is a rare but serious condition in permanent venous tracing. A 65-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with high fever and chills. A DDD pacemaker had been implanted via the right subclavian vein because of sick sinus syndrome 6 years earlier. Transesophageal echocardiogram identified an oscillating round hyperechoic mass with a stalk near the tricuspid valve. Blood cultures grew Staphylococcus hominis. The patient was treated with antibiotics and operated on after the acute phase of the illness had subsided. We hereby report a case of lead endocarditis caused by S. hominis in a patient with pacemaker, which has been rarely reported in the English literature. [source] The Importance of Ventricular Septal Morphology in the Effectiveness of Dual Chamber Pacing in Hypertrophic Obstructive CardiomyopathyPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2000PETKOW DIMITROW It has been reported that older patients with hypertrophic obstructive Cardiomyopathy (HOCM) benefited the most from dual chamber (DDD) pacing. Since in older patients the distribution of septal hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) cavity shape differs from that in younger patients, we decided to study the efficacy of DDD pacing on the reduction of LV outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in different patterns of septal hypertrophy. We compared HOCM patients with nonreversed septal curvature, thus preserving the elliptical LV cavity contour (common in the elderly), (group I) versus patients with reversed septal curvature, deforming the LV cavity to a crescent shape (common in the young), (group II). Eighteen HOCM patients were studied (11 patients in group I and 7 patients in group II). After implantation of a DDD pacemaker, the LVOT gradient was measured using Doppler echocardiography at various programmed AV delay intervals to determine the maximal percentage decrease of LVOT gradient from baseline. The measurement was repeated after at least a 6-month follow-up (chronic DDD pacing). The baseline LVOT gradient was comparable between groups (79 ± 28 vs 81 ± 25 mmHg, P = 0.92). The LVOT gradient reduction at acute DDD pacing was significantly greater in group I than group II (61 ± 18% vs 23 ± 10%, P = 0.0001). This difference in favor of the patients from group I was maintained at midterm follow-up (69 ± 17% vs 40 ± 17% P = 0.0076). In conclusion, patients with normal septal curvature and preserved elliptical LV cavity shape had a greater reduction of LVOT gradient after DDD pacing than patients with reversed septal curvature deforming LV cavity. The proposed criterion assessing the septal curvature may be useful to predict the efficacy of DDD pacing in the reduction of LVOT gradient. [source] Determinants of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with DDD Pacemaker ImplantationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2003AHMET DURAN DEMIR DEMIR, A.D., et al.: Determinants of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with DDD Pacemaker Implantation.Occurrence of AF in a pacemaker implanted patient is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic determinants of persistent AF in patients with DDD pacemakers. A 101 consecutive patients were followed for an average of19.8 ± 11.8months. Persistent AF was documented in 21 (20.8%) patients and 80 (79.2%) patients were in sinus or physiologically paced rhythm. In patients with persistent AF, previous AF attacks were observed more frequently(P < 0.03)and left atrial dimension was higher(3.5 ± 0.6vs3.0 ± 0.5 cm, P < 0.001). Average P maximum and P wave dispersion (PWD) values calculated in a 12-lead surface electrocardiogram were also found to be significantly higher in patients with persistent AF(P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of previous AF attacks(RR 8.95, P < 0.001), increased left atrial dimension(RR 2.1, P < 0.02), P maximum duration120 ms (RR 6.1, P < 0.001), and PWD 40 ms(RR 12.2, P < 0.001)were associated with an increased risk of persistent AF. Cut-off points were 120 ms for P maximum and 40 ms for PWD. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated as 76.2, 82.5, 53.3, and 92.9 for P maximum and as 85.7, 87.5, 64.3, and 95.9 for PWD, respectively. In patients with DDD pacemakers, previous AF attacks, increased left atrial dimension, P maximum value of 120 ms, and a PWD value of 40 ms were associated with a significantly increased risk of persistent AF. These patients must further be managed with other treatment modalities to prevent the development of persistent AF. (PACE 2003; 26:719,724) [source] Efficacy of Single Lead VDD Pacing in Patients with Impaired and Normal Left Ventricular FunctionPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2000ANDREAS SCHUCHERT Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing seems to be the best pacing mode for patients with advanced AV block and impaired LV function. The long-term follow-up of single lead VDD pacing was studied in 33 patients with impaired LV function and compared to 42 patients with normal LV function. All patients received the same VDD lead and VDDR pacemaker. The lead model with 13-cm AV spacing between the atrial and ventricular electrode was implanted in 89% of the patients. Follow-ups were 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage of atrial sensing and the P wave amplitude were determined at each follow-up. Minimal P wave amplitude at implantation was 2.0 ± 1.4 mV in patients with impaired and 1.7 ± 0.9 mV with normal LV function (not significant). At the 12-month follow-up, 33 patients with normal and 23 patients with depressed LV function remained paced in the VDD mode. The remaining patients died in five (impaired LV function) and seven cases (normal LV function) or their pacemakers were programmed to the VVI/VVIR pacing mode in four (impaired LV function) and three cases (normal LV function). P wave amplitude did not differ in the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 1.17 ± 0.42 mV; normal: 1.09 ± 0.49 mV). The atrial sensitivity was programmed in most patients to sensitive settings with no differences between the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 0.13 ± 0.06 mV; normal: 0.13 ± 0.05 m V). The diagnostic counters indicated nearly permanent atrial sensing (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 99.3 ± 2.2%; normal: 99.0 ± 1.0 mV). In conclusions, single lead VDD pacing restored AV synchronous ventricular pacing in patients with normal and with impaired LV function indicating that it could be an alternative to DDD pacemakers, but not to dual-chamber pacing. [source] |