Home  About us  Contact
 

Cutting Balloon (cutting + balloon)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Terms modified by Cutting Balloon

  • cutting balloon angioplasty
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Cutting Balloon for In-Stent Restenosis:

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2004
    Acute, Long-Term Results
    Introduction: Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has shown a high rate of ISR (30,55%). Considering the need for both extrusion of hyperplastic intima and additional stent expansion, a cutting balloon might be more effective for the treatment of ISR. Methods: We prospectively assessed the immediate and 8-month outcome of balloon angioplasty using the Barath Cutting Balloon in 100 consecutive patients (mean age: 60.5 ± 10.8 years, 71% male). Results: In 73 lesions (73%), a good result was reached with the cutting balloon only. In 21 lesions (21%) postdilatation and in 6 lesions (6%) predilatation with a conventional balloon was necessary. The mean inflation pressure was 8.7 ± 2.0 (range: 6.0,18.0) atm. Before the procedure the mean minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was 0.95 ± 0.45 mm. Quantitative coronary analysis showed a mean diameter stenosis of 65%± 16%. Immediately after the procedure the mean MLD was 2.42 ± 0.54 mm with a mean diameter stenosis of 19%± 13%. Two patients died during the follow-up period (1 stroke, 1 nonvascular). At 8-month follow-up 26 patients (26%) reported to have anginal complaints CCS class II,IV of whom 16 (16%) needed target lesion revascularization. Conclusion: Treatment of ISR using the Barath Cutting Balloon can be performed safely with good immediate results and a relatively low need for repeated target lesion revascularization at 8-month follow-up. [source]

    Immediate and 3-Month Follow-Up Outcome After Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Bifurcation Lesions

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2004
    HIDEO TAKEBAYASHI M.D.
    Balloon angioplasty of a bifurcation lesion is associated with lower rates of success and higher rates of complications than such treatment of lesions of most other morphologies. To date, the best device or procedure for bifurcation lesions has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and 3-month follow-up outcome of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) versus conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. We treated 87 consecutive bifurcation lesions with CBA (n = 50) or PTCA (n = 37). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and angiographic follow-up was achieved for 93% of the lesions. The procedural success was 92% in the CBA group and 76% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two lesions in the CBA group and six in the PTCA group (P = 0.05). The incidence of bail-out stenting in the CBA group was lower than in the conventional PTCA (8% vs 24%, P < 0.05). At the 3-month follow-up, the restenosis rate was 40% in the CBA group versus 67% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Clinical events during follow-up did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, in comparison with PTCA, procedural success was greater and the restenosis rate lower with CBA. The results of this study support the use of the cutting balloon as optimal treatment for bifurcation lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2004;17:1,7) [source]

    Extraction of previously deployed stent by an entrapped cutting balloon due to the blade fracture

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 2 2002
    Akio Kawamura MD
    Abstract During treatment for in-stent restenosis, entrapment of cutting balloon occurred because of the blade fracture. Removal of the balloon caused stent extraction, inducing acute occlusion of the coronary artery. Application of cutting balloon for in-stent restenosis requires every caution against such type of complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:239,243. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

    Venous rupture during percutaneous treatment of hemodialysis fistulas and grafts,

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 7 2009
    John A. Bittl MD
    Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the risk and consequences of venous rupture during angioplasty of malfunctioning hemodialysis grafts and fistulas. Background: Venous stenoses in the outflow limb of hemodialysis accesses often require ultra-high balloon pressure for optimal dilatation. Methods: Baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed for a consecutive series of patients treated between 1999 and 2008. Results: Venous rupture or perforation occurred in 11 of 1242 (0.9%) procedures. No patient with a rupture or perforation died or required emergency or urgent surgical repair. Two of 11 patients (18.2%) required transfusions, 8 of 11 patients (72.7%) required stenting, and 6 of 8 (75.0%) who needed stenting received covered stents to achieve hemostasis. Rupture led to access thrombosis within 30 days in 9 of 11 cases (82%). Multivariable logistical regression analysis suggested that using a balloon catheter more than 2 mm larger than the diameter of the hemodialysis access or using peripheral cutting balloons increased the risk of rupture or perforation. Conclusions: Rupture or perforation is a rare complication of treatment of malfunctioning hemodialysis grafts and fistulas. The complication may be managed with nonsurgical methods and might be avoided by optimal balloon selection and sizing. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]