Correlation Coefficient Value (correlation + coefficient_value)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Translation and validation of a Chinese language version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, Issue 6 2009
GILLIAN H. M. LEE
Objective., This study aimed to adapt the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) for pre-school children in a Chinese speaking community and to investigate its psychometric properties (validity and reliability). Methods., A Chinese language version of the ECOHIS was derived through a forward,backward translation and tested for face and content validity among a focus group. A convenient sample of pre-school children (n = 111) was recruited (including a sub-sample with early childhood caries and caries-free children). Parents of the children self-completed the derived Chinese-ECOHIS measure. Validity of the measure was assessed by investigating the relationship between dental caries status and Chinese-ECOHIS scores (construct and criterion validity). A sub-sample of the parents repeated the ratings of the measure to enable reliability assessments. Both internal and test,retest reliability were determined. Results., A Chinese version of ECOHIS was derived with minor modification to the original version. Chinese-ECOHIS scores were associated with children's caries experience (dmft) (r = 0.66, P < 0.05) supporting convergent validity. In addition, variations in ECOHIS scores were apparent with respect to caries and caries-free groups (P < 0.001), supporting the ability to distinguish between patient groups. Cronbach's alpha values (internal reliability) for total ECOHIS score were 0.91 and intraclass correlation coefficient value (test,retest reliability) was 0.64. Conclusions., A Chinese version of the ECOHIS was developed and demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability. These findings can enable assessments of pre-school child oral health-related quality of life in Chinese speaking communities. [source]


Psychometric attributes of the SCOPA-COG Brazilian version

MOVEMENT DISORDERS, Issue 1 2008
Francisco Javier Carod-Artal MD
Abstract Cross-cultural adaptation and independent psychometric assessment of the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease-Cognition (SCOPA-COG), Brazilian version was performed. Parkinson's disease (PD) patients were evaluated by means of the SCOPA-Motor scale, Hoehn and Yahr staging (HY), Clinical Impression of Severity Index-PD (CISI-PD), Parkinson Psychosis Rating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Cognition was evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), and SCOPA-COG. The following attributes were explored: acceptability, scaling assumptions, reliability, precision, and construct validity. One hundred fifty-two patients were assessed (mean age, 63.2 years; disease duration, 7.8 years; median HY stage, 3). Mean SCOPA-COG and MMSE were 18.2 and 25.7, respectively. The internal consistency of the SCOPA-COG (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81; item-total correlation, 0.38,0.62) was satisfactory. While the intraclass correlation coefficient value was 0.80, weighted kappa ranged from 0.30 (dice task) to 0.72 (animal fluency task). The standard error of measurement value for the SCOPA-COG was 3.2, whereas the smallest real difference was 8.9. SCOPA-COG total scores significantly decreased as the HY stage increased (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.0001). Age, years of education, and PD duration (all, P < 0.001) were observed to have an independent, significant effect on the SCOPA-COG. The SCOPA-COG is a short, reliable, valid instrument that is sensitive to cognitive deficits specific to PD. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society [source]


Mechanism studies on CVD of boron carbide from a gas mixture of BCL3, CH4, and H2 in a dual impinging-jet reactor

AICHE JOURNAL, Issue 3 2009
Mustafa Karaman
Abstract Nearly pure boron carbide free from impurities was produced on a tungsten substrate in a dual impinging-jet chemical vapor deposition reactor from a BCl3, CH4, and H2 mixture. The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis proved the formation of reaction intermediate BHCl2, which is proposed to occur mainly in the gaseous boundary layer next to the substrate surface. Among a large number of reaction mechanisms proposed only the ones considering the molecular adsorption of boron carbide on the substrate surface gave reasonable fits. In the proposed mechanism dichloroborane is formed in the gas phase only as a by-product. Boron carbide, on the other hand, is formed through a series of surface reactions involving adsorbed boron trichloride, adsorbed methane and gas phase hydrogen. The simultaneous fit of the experimental rate data to the model expressions gave correlation coefficient values of 0.977 and 0.948, in predicting the B4C and BHCl2 formation rates, respectively. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2009 [source]


Assessment in the context of uncertainty: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test?

MEDICAL EDUCATION, Issue 3 2005
R Gagnon
Purpose, The script concordance test (SCT) assesses clinical reasoning in the context of uncertainty. Because there is no single correct answer, scoring is based on a comparison of answers provided by examinees with those provided by members of a panel of reference made up of experienced practitioners. This study aims to determine how many members are needed on the panel to obtain reliable scores to compare against the scores of examinees. Methods, A group of 80 residents were tested on 73 items (Cronbach's ,: 0.76). A total of 38 family doctors made up the pool of experienced practitioners, from which 1000 random panels of reference of increasing sizes (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30) were generated with a resampling procedure. Residents' scores were computed for each panel sample. Units of analysis were means of residents' score, test reliability coefficient and correlation coefficient between scores obtained with a given panel of reference versus the scores obtained with the full panel of 38. Statistics were averaged across the 1000 samples for each panel size for the mean and test reliability computations, and across 100 samples for the correlation computation. Results, For sample variability, there was a 3-fold increase in standard deviation of means between a sample panel size of 5 (SD = 1.57) and a panel size of 30 (SD = 0.50). For reliability, there was a large difference in precision between a panel size of 5 (0.62) and a panel size of 10 (0.70). When the panel size was over 20, the gain became negligible (0.74 for 20 and 0.76 for 38). For correlation, the mean correlation coefficient values were 0.90 with 5 panel members, 0.95 with 10 members and 0.98 with 20 members. Conclusion, Any number over 10 is associated with acceptable reliability and good correlation between the samples versus the full panel of 38. For high stake examinations, using a panel of 20 members is recommended. Recruiting more than 20 panel members shows only a marginal benefit in terms of psychometric properties. [source]