Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Conventional Colonoscopy (conventional + colonoscopy)
Selected AbstractsSCHISTOSOMIASIS JAPONICA IDENTIFIED BY LAPAROSCOPIC AND COLONOSCOPIC EXAMINATIONDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 2 2010Keiko Hosho A 45-year-old Philippine woman who came from Mindanao Island was admitted to our hospital with a complaint of epigastric discomfort. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography demonstrated a network pattern and linear calcification in the liver. Laparoscopic examination showed numerous yellowish, small speckles over the liver surface. The liver surface was separated into many small blocks by groove-like depressions, demonstrating a so-called tortoise shell pattern. Conventional colonoscopy and narrow-band imaging showed irregular areas of yellowish mucosa, and diminished vascular network and increased irregular microvessels extending from the descending colon to the rectum. Liver biopsy showed many Schistosoma japonicum eggs in Glisson's capsule and colon biopsy showed many S. japonicum eggs in the submucosal layer. These findings established a diagnosis of schistosomiasis japonica. The present case is imported schistosomiasis japonica. Even though new cases have not occurred recently in Japan, we should remain aware of schistosomiasis japonica for patients who came from foreign epidemic areas. [source] DIAGNOSIS OF COLONIC ADENOMAS BY NEW AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING SYSTEM: A PILOT STUDYDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 2007Noriya Uedo Detection and removal of adenoma by colonoscopy is an important means of preventing cancer. Autofluorescence endoscopy can visualize flat or isochromatic tumor that was not detectable by white light endoscopy by the difference in tissue fluorescence properties. Recently, a new autofluorescence imaging system (AFI, Olympus Medical Systems) using a combination of autofluorescence and reflection imaging has been developed. The purpose of the present paper was to investigate its feasibility in detection of colonic adenoma in a clinical setting. A total of 64 patients were randomly assigned to AFI or white light groups, and the distal sigmoid colon and the rectum was observed under autofluorescence or white light followed by the other mode of observation by a different endoscopist. The diagnostic ability of each method for detection of neoplasms was compared in relation to the histology as a reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of AFI for detection of neoplastic polyps was 84% and 60%, respectively, and were similar to those of white light colonoscopy: 90% and 64%. Conventional colonoscopy overlooked more flat lesions including one adenocarcinoma. AFI has the potential to detect more flat lesions but efficacy was unable to be demonstrated in the restricted population. Further investigations are needed to determine optimum usage. [source] MAGNIFYING COLONOSCOPY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF INFLAMMATORY CHANGES IN ULCERATIVE COLITISDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 3 2006Satoshi Sugano Background:, Endoscopic observation is the most effective method for the evaluation of staging in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, in cases with very mild inflammatory activity, histopathological diagnosis may also be required. Unfortunately, biopsy-related accidents are not uncommon. As an alternative, we have used a magnifying colonoscope commonly used for tumor diagnosis to examine in detail the colon mucosa of UC patients in clinical remission, and then compared these findings relative to conventional endoscopy using histopathological diagnosis. Subjects and Methods:, Among UC cases examined by colonoscopy between April 2000 and April 2005, 27 cases without hematochezia for at least 1 month were enrolled in this study. Following observations of inflammatory changes using conventional colonoscopy, magnifying observation and biopsies at a total of 144 sites were evaluated. Using histopathological standards, acute-phase inflammation was indicated by the presence of neutrophil infiltration, whereas chronic-phase inflammation was indicated by infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells and eosinophils. Results:, Indicators of significant inflammation by conventional observation was erosion. Under magnification, inflammation appears as superficial defects in mucosa and small whitish spots. When the presence of infiltrating neutrophils was used as a positive histological marker for inflammation, there was no difference in the accuracy of diagnosis by conventional observation (95.1%) versus magnifying observation (97.2%). In contrast, when lymphocyte infiltration was used as a marker, the accuracy of diagnosis increased significantly (88.2%) using magnifying observation relative to conventional observation (61.1%). Conclusions:, Magnifying endoscopy can be used effectively in the evaluation of minute mucosal changes in cases of UC remission. [source] MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: Diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptanceINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 8 2007Jost Langhorst MD Abstract Background: The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography (MRC) without bowel cleansing regarding its ability to quantify inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In addition, patient acceptance was compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). Methods: In all, 29 patients with IBD (17 ulcerative colitis; 12 Crohn's disease) were included. While CC was performed after bowel cleansing as the gold standard, MRC was based on a fecal tagging technique and performed 48,72 hours prior to CC. The presence of inflammation in each of 7 ileocolonic segments was rated for every procedure. Patients evaluated both modalities and dedicated aspects of the examination according to a 10-point-scale (1 = good, 10 = poor acceptance). Furthermore, preferences for future examinations were investigated. Results: Inflammatory segments were found by means of CC in 23 and by MRC in 14 patients. Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRC in a segment-based detection were 32% and 88%, respectively. Concerning severely inflamed segments, sensitivity increased to 53% for MRC. Overall acceptance of CC was significantly higher compared to MRC (mean value (mv) for MRT = 6.0; CC = 4.1; P = 0.003). For MRC, the placement of the rectal tube (mv = 7.3), and for CC bowel purgation (mv = 6.5), were rated as the most unpleasant. A total of 67% of patients voted for CC as the favorable tool for future examinations. Conclusions: The presented data indicate that ,fecal tagging MRC' is not suitable for an adequate quantification of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel. Furthermore, overall acceptance of endoscopic colonoscopy was superior to MRC. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007) [source] Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with mri colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: First clinical experienceINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 4 2005Andreas G Schreyer MD Abstract Background: Magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) is a recently introduced imaging technique that assesses the small bowel with similar sensitivity and specificity as the fluoroscopically performed conventional enteroclysis. Magnetic resonance imaging colonography (MRC) seems to be a promising technique for polyp assessment in the colon. In this feasibility study, we evaluated the combination of small bowel MRI with unprepared MRC as an integrative diagnostic approach of the whole bowel in patients with Crohn's disease. Methods: Thirty patients with known Crohn's disease were prospectively examined. No particular colonic preparation was applied. Applying the dark lumen technique in all patients, MRE and MRC were performed within 1 session using an integrative examination protocol. T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were acquired. Inflammation assessment (grades 0 to 2) of the colon was compared with conventional colonoscopy in 29 patient and with surgery in 1 patient. The entire colon was graded fair to good distended in all patients. In 11 of 210 evaluated colonic segments, feces hindered an adequate intraluminal bowel assessment. Twenty-three of 30 patients had complete colonoscopy as the gold standard. In 7 patients, complete colonoscopy could not be performed because of an inflamed stenosis. Results: Correct grading of colonic inflammation was performed with 55.1% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity in all segments. Considering only more extensive inflammation (grade 2), the sensitivity of MRC increased to 70.2% with a specificity of 99.2%. Conclusions: The combination of MRE and MRC could improve the diagnostic value of abdominal MRI evaluation in patients with Crohn's disease. However, MRC can not replace conventional colonoscopy in subtle inflammation assessment. [source] Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for stricturing postoperative recurrence in Crohn's diseaseINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 6 2003Dr. Livia Biancone Abstract Background The place of virtual colonoscopy (VC) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) requiring endoscopic follow-up after surgery is unknown. The authors compared findings from VC versus conventional colonoscopy (CC) for assessing the postoperative recurrence of CD. Methods Sixteen patients with ileocolonic anastomosis for CD were prospectively enrolled from January 2001 to January 2002. Recurrence was assessed by CC according to Rutgeerts et al. VC was performed with a computed tomography scanner, with images examined by three radiologists who were unaware of the endoscopic findings. Results CC showed perianastomotic recurrence in 15 of 16 patients. Perianastomotic narrowing or stenosis was detected by VC in 11 of these 15 patients. There were 11 true positive, 1 true negative, 0 false-positive, and 4 false-negative findings (73% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, 20% negative predictive value, 75% accuracy). Among the eight patients showing a rigid stenosis of the anastomosis not allowing passage of the colonoscope, VC detected narrowing or stenosis in seven patients. Conclusions The current findings suggest that although the widespread use of VC in CD is currently not indicated because of possible false-negative findings, this technique may represent an alternative to CC in noncompliant postsurgical patients with a rigid stenosis not allowing passage of the endoscope. [source] MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomosesJOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Issue 1 2006Waleed Ajaj MD Abstract Purpose To assess colonic anastomoses in patients after surgical treatment by means of MR colonography (MRC) in comparison with conventional colonoscopy (CC). Materials and Methods A total of 39 patients who had previously undergone colonic resection and end-to-end-anastomosis were included in the study. MRI was based on a dark-lumen approach. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) three-dimensional (3D) images were collected following the rectal administration of water for colonic distension. The MRC data were evaluated by two radiologists. The criteria employed to evaluate the anastomoses included bowel wall thickening and increased contrast uptake in this region. Furthermore, all other colonic segments were assessed for the presence of pathologies. Results In 23 and 20 patients the anastomosis was rated to be normal by MRC and CC, respectively. In three patients CC revealed a slight inflammation of the anastomosis that was missed by MRI. A moderate stenosis of the anastomosis without inflammation was detected by MRC in five patients, which was confirmed by CC. In the remaining 11 patients a relevant pathology of the anastomosis was diagnosed by both MRC and CC. Recurrent tumor was diagnosed in two patients with a history of colorectal carcinoma. In the other nine patients inflammation of the anastomosis was seen in seven with Crohn's disease (CD) and two with ulcerative colitis. MRC did not yield any false-positive findings, resulting in an overall sensitivity/specificity for the assessment of the anastomosis of 84%/100%. Conclusion MRC represents a promising alternative to CC for the assessment of colonic anastomoses in patients with previous colonic resection. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Small bowel hydro-MR imaging for optimized ileocecal distension in Crohn's disease: Should an additional rectal enema filling be performed?JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Issue 1 2005Waleed Ajaj MD Abstract Purpose To assess the impact of an additional rectal enema filling in small bowel hydro-MRI in patients with Crohn's disease. Materials and Methods A total of 40 patients with known Crohn's disease were analyzed retrospectively: 20 patients only ingested an oral contrast agent (group A), the other 20 subjects obtained an additional rectal water enema (group B). For small bowel distension, a solution containing 0.2% locust bean gum (LBG) and 2.5% mannitol was used. In all patients, a breathhold contrast-enhanced T1w three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breathhold examination (VIBE) sequence was acquired. Comparative analysis was based on image quality and bowel distension as well as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements. MR findings were compared with those of conventional colonoscopy, as available (N = 25). Results The terminal ileum and rectum showed a significantly higher distension following the rectal administration of water. Furthermore, fewer artifacts were seen within group B. This resulted in a higher reader confidence for the diagnosis of bowel disease, not only in the colon, but also in the ileocecal region. Diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing inflammation of the terminal ileum was 100% in group B; in the nonenema group there were three false-negative diagnoses of terminal ileitis. Conclusion Our data show that the additional administration of a rectal enema is useful in small bowel MRI for the visualization of the terminal ileum. The additional time needed for the enema administration was minimal, and small and large bowel pathologies could be diagnosed with high accuracy. Thus, we suggest that a rectal enema in small bowel MR imaging be considered. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;22:92,100. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer , a prospective trial of 150 patientsCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2 2009T. J. White Abstract Objective, Virtual colonoscopy (VC)/CT colonography has advantages over the well-documented limitations of colonoscopy/barium enema. This prospective blinded investigative comparison trial aimed to evaluate the ability of VC to assess the large bowel, compared to conventional colonoscopy (CC), in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Method, We studied 150 patients (73 males, mean age 60.9 years) at high risk of CRC. Following bowel preparation, VC was undertaken using colonic insufflation and 2D-spiral CT acquisition. Two radiologists reported the images and a consensual agreement reached. Direct comparison was made with CC (performed later the same day). Interobserver agreement was calculated using the Kappa method. Postal questionnaires sought patient preference. Results, Virtual colonoscopy visualized the caecum in all cases. Five (3.33%) VCs were classified as inadequate owing to poor distension/faecal residue. CC completion rate was 86%. Ultimately, 44 patients had normal findings, 44 had diverticular disease, 11 had inflammatory bowel disease, 18 had cancers, and 33 patients had 42 polyps. VC identified 19 cancers , a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99.2% respectively. For detecting polyps > 10 mm, VC had a sensitivity and specificity (per patient) of 91% and 99.2% respectively. VC identified four polyps proximal to stenosing carcinomas and extracolonic malignancies in nine patients (6%). No procedural complications occurred with either investigation. A Kappa score achieved for interobserver agreement was 0.777. Conclusion, Virtual colonoscopy is an effective and safe method for evaluating the bowel and was the investigation of choice amongst patients surveyed. VC provided information additional to CC on both proximal and extracolonic pathology. VC may become the diagnostic procedure of choice for symptomatic patients at high risk of CRC, with CC being reserved for therapeutic intervention, or where a tissue diagnosis is required. [source] | ||||||||||