Contemporary Series (contemporary + series)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Early Surgical Morbidity and Mortality in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: The University of Michigan Experience

CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, Issue 2 2008
Ginnie L. Abarbanell MD
ABSTRACT Objectives., To review early surgical outcomes in a contemporary series of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) undergoing cardiac operations at the University of Michigan, and to investigate possible preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Methods., A retrospective medical record review was performed for all patients ,18 years of age who underwent open heart operations by a pediatric cardiothoracic surgeon at the University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2004. Records from a cohort of pediatric patients ages 1,17 years were matched to a subset of the adult patients by surgical procedure and date of operation. Results., In total, 243 cardiac surgical operations were performed in 234 adult patients with CHD. Overall mortality was 4.7% (11/234). The incidence of major postoperative complications was 10% (23/234) with a 19% (45/23) minor complication rate. The most common postoperative complication was atrial arrhythmias in 10.8% (25/234). The presence of preoperative lung or liver disease, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times, and postoperative elevated inotropic score and serum lactates were significant predictors of mortality in adults. There was no difference between the adult and pediatric cohorts in terms of mortality and morbidity. Conclusions., The postoperative course in adults following surgery for CHD is generally uncomplicated and early survival should be expected. Certain risk factors for increased mortality in this patient population may include preoperative presence of chronic lung or liver dysfunction, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times, and postoperative elevated inotropic score and serum lactate levels. [source]


Thrombotic complications following liver resection for colorectal metastases are preventable

HPB, Issue 5 2008
G. Morris-Stiff
Background. Surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) can be expected to be associated with a significant rate of thromboembolic complications due to the performance of long-duration oncologic resections in patients aged 60 years. Aims. To determine the prevalence of clinically significant thrombotic complications, including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE), in a contemporary series of patients undergoing resection of CRLM with standard prophylaxis. Material and methods. A prospectively maintained database identified patients undergoing resection of CRLM from January 2000 to March 2007 and highlighted those developing thromboembolic complications. In addition, the radiology department database was reviewed to ensure that clinically suspicious thromboses had been confirmed radiologically by ultrasound in the case of DVT or computed tomography for PEs. Results. During the period of the study, 523 patients (336 M and 187 F) with a mean age of 65 years underwent resection. A major hepatectomy was performed in 59.9%. One or more complications were seen in 45.1% (n=236) of patients. Thrombotic complications were seen in 11 (2.1%) patients: DVT alone (n=4) and PE (n=7). Eight of 11 thrombotic complications occurred in patients undergoing major hepatectomy, 4 of which were trisectionectomies. Patients were anti-coagulated and there were no mortalities. Conclusions. The symptomatic thromboembolic complication rate was lower in this cohort than may be expected in patients undergoing non-hepatic abdominal surgery. It is uncertain whether this is due entirely to effective prophylaxis or to a combination of treatment and a natural anti-coagulant state following hepatic resection. [source]


Radical prostatectomy in obese patients: Improved surgical outcomes in recent years

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 8 2010
Uri Lindner
Objectives: Obesity has been proposed as a risk factor for reduced disease-specific survival, increased positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between obesity and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing RP. Methods: Medical records of 491 patients who underwent RP from 2004 to 2007 were retrieved from our institutional database. Patients were divided into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI): <25, 25,30 (overweight) and >30 kg/m (obese). Outcomes after RP were compared between the groups in terms of length of stay, perioperative complications, BCR, PSM and Gleason scores. Results: Age, stage and preoperative prostate-specific antigen were similar between BMI categories. Operating time was prolonged in obese patients (146 vs 135 min, P = 0.01) and blood loss was greater (mean estimated blood loss 640 vs 504 mL, P = 0.02), but did not translate into higher transfusion rates. Early complication rates, PSM rates and Gleason scores were not statistically different between the groups. Significant differences in late outcomes, such as the need for adjunct procedures or BCR (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.18,1.09), were not shown. Conclusion: As surgical experience with high BMI patients has developed, RP appears to be a well tolerated procedure in contemporary series, irrespective of BMI. In particular, early outcome parameters, such as PSM and BCR rates, are similar. [source]


Penile Rehabilitation after Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?

THE JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, Issue 4ii 2007
FACS, Run Wang MD
ABSTRACT Introduction., Postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction (ED) remains a serious quality-of-life issue. Recent advances in the understanding of the mechanism of postprostatectomy ED have stimulated great attention toward penile rehabilitation. Aim., This review presents and analyzes a contemporary series of the recent medical literature pertaining to penile rehabilitation therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP). Main Outcome Measures., The laboratory and clinical studies related to penile rehabilitation are analyzed. The validity of the methodology and the conclusion of the findings from each study are determined. Methods., The published and presented reports dealing with penile rehabilitation following RP in human and cavernous nerve injury in animal models are reviewed. Results., Exciting scientific discoveries have improved our understanding of postprostatectomy ED at the molecular level. The rationale for postprostatectomy penile rehabilitation appears to be logical according to animal studies. However, clinical studies have not consistently replicated the beneficial effects found in the laboratory studies. Currently available clinical studies are flawed due to short-term follow-up, small number of patients in the studies, studies with retrospective nature, or prospective studies without control. Rehabilitation programs are also facing a challenge with the compliance, which is critical for success for any rehabilitation program. At the present time, we do not have concrete evidence to recommend what, when, how long, and how often a particular penile rehabilitative therapy can be used effectively. Conclusions., Large prospective, multicentered, placebo-controlled trials with adequate follow-up are necessary to determine the cost-effective and therapeutic benefits of particular penile rehabilitative therapy or therapies in patients following the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Until such evidence is available, it is difficult to recommend any particular penile rehabilitation program as a standard of practice. Wang R. Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: Where do we stand and where are we going? J Sex Med 2007;4:1085,1097. [source]


Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed on transurethral biopsy or resection is not always indicative of aggressive disease: implications for clinical management

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2010
Hakan Aydin
Study Type , Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To report the clinicopathological characteristics of 23 cases of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate (DCP) and discuss the implications for clinical management, as DCP is considered an aggressive subtype of prostate adenocarcinoma (PA). PATIENTS AND METHODS The presence of DCP in transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB) is associated with adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy (RP) and clinical outcomes, and the significance of detecting DCP initially in transurethral biopsy (UB) or transurethral resection (TURP) in the present era of screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is unclear. The study included 23 cases of pure DCP without acinar PA diagnosed on UB or TURP. Demographic information, serum PSA level, follow-up surgical procedures (RP, TURP or TRUSB) and outcome data were collected. RESULTS The mean age of the men was 67.5 years and the mean PSA level before the procedure was 12.5 ng/mL; 14 cases were detected on UB and nine were diagnosed on TURP. The mean (range) follow-up was 4 (1,23) months after the initial procedure. In all, 21 (89%) patients had DCP or PA in follow-up procedures. Two (11%) patients had no residual cancer, one on RP and the other on two repeat TURPs. DCP or PA was found in 12 RP cases; four patients had Gleason score 7 PA, three of which were organ-confined, and eight had Gleason score ,8 PA. Extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and regional lymph node metastasis were present in seven, six and two cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Most DCP diagnosed on UB or TURP in this contemporary series was associated with aggressive PA, but a subset presented as a small periurethral tumour with no concomitant acinar PA, and was eradicated by the initial biopsy/TURP alone. We recommend that patients with a diagnosis of DCP on UB or TURP undergo follow-up TURP and TRUSB before radical surgery is offered. [source]


A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2009
Vincenzo Ficarra
OBJECTIVE To compare the functional results of two contemporary series of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) or retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a non-randomized prospective comparative study of all patients undergoing RALP or RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution from February 2006 to April 2007. RESULTS We enrolled 105 patients in the RRP and 103 in the RALP group; the two groups were comparable for all clinical and pathological variables, except median age. For RRP and RALP the respective median operative duration was 135 and 185 min (P < 0.001), the intraoperative blood loss 500 and 300 mL (P < 0.001) and postoperative transfusion rates 14% and 1.9% (P < 0.01). There were complications in 9.7% and 10.4% of the patients (P = 0.854) after RRP and RALP, respectively; the positive surgical margin rates in pT2 cancers were 12.2% and 11.7% (P = 0.70). For urinary continence, 41% of patients having RRP and 68.9% of those having RALP were continent at catheter removal (P < 0.001). The 12-month continence rates were 88% after RRP and 97% after RALP (P = 0.01), with the mean time to continence being 75 and 25 days (P < 0.001), respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, 20 of 41 patients having bilateral nerve-sparing RRP (49%) and 52 of 64 having bilateral nerve-sparing RALP (81%) (P < 0.001) had recovery of erectile function. CONCLUSIONS RALP offers better results than RRP in terms of urinary continence and erectile function recovery, with similar positive surgical margin rates. [source]


Renal surgery in the elderly: morbidity in patients aged >75 years in a contemporary series

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 6 2008
Michael Staehler
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the surgical complications in a contemporary group of elderly patients with renal masses, as almost a quarter of patients with newly diagnosed renal mass are aged >74 years, with the potential for significant comorbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS From April 2004 to June 2007, of 379 surgical resections of renal tumours, we assessed 117 consecutive patients aged ,75 years, who had either radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) for assumed renal cell carcinoma. Also elderly patients who had nephroureterectomy (NU) for upper urothelial cancer were followed. RESULTS Fifty patients had RN, 57 PN and 10 had NU; the median (range) age of all patients was 78.1 (72.7,92.5) years and was similar in all groups. No patient died during surgery and only one died within 90 days. The complication rates during and after surgery RN, PN and NU were 12%, 15% and 20%, respectively; the major complications within 30 days were 4%, 7% and 10%; major complications included bleeding during surgery and one acute bleeding event after surgery in the PN group. CONCLUSIONS Open renal surgery in elderly patients can be done safely; there was no difference in morbidity among RN, PN and NU. Renal surgery in the elderly patient is safe if done at a specialized centre. Mortality and morbidity can be very low, rendering this a feasible approach in the treatment of renal masses even if the prognosis is not determined by the oncological situation but by comorbidity. [source]


46 Laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: a contemporary series from a single centre

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2006
R.E. POWER
Introduction:, Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy offers potential advantages to the donor and has become a routine procedure for live kidney procurement worldwide. Since 2000 our live donor patients have been offered a laparoscopic nephrectomy. Patients and Methods:, Between February 2000 and August 2005 we performed 183 donor-recipient operations at our institution (ODN = 83 and LND = 100). We prospectively collected information on all donors and recipients for the same period to audit our experience with the first 100 LDN,s. Patients made their operative choice following discussions regarding the unit experience and literature information. We present our findings with specific emphasis on donor operative details and early recipient graft outcome. Results:, Donor and recipient age, gender, body mass index, HLA mismatches, warm ischaemia and vascular anastomotic times did not significantly differ between the two groups. There were two conversions to an open operation in the LND group and neither impacted upon recipient graft outcome. The mean operative duration was 178 ± 38 for the LDN and 159 ± 34 min for the ODN (P < 0.05). The mean length of hospital stay was 4.7 ± 1.2 days in the LND group versus 6.8 ± 1.5 days in the ODN group (P < 0.05). There was one case of delayed graft function in both groups. Serum creatinine at 1, 6 and 12 months did not differ significantly between either groups. Vascular and ureteric complications and lymphocoele rates were similar in both groups. Conclusions:, Our contemporaneous series demonstrates the safe introduction of a laparoscopic living donor programme without compromise towards donor patient safety or allograft outcome. [source]