Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Contact Dermatitis (contact + dermatitis)
Kinds of Contact Dermatitis Terms modified by Contact Dermatitis Selected AbstractsThe continuing rise of contact dermatitis, Part 2: The scientific journalCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 4 2009Derek R. Smith Background: Although citation analysis represents an increasingly common method for examining the performance of scientific journals, few longitudinal studies have been conducted in the specialist fields of dermatology. Objectives: The objective of this study was to provide the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Contact Dermatitis for the 30-year period between 1977 and 2006. Materials and Methods: Detailed historical data were extracted from the Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports® and systematically analysed. The most highly cited articles published in the journal were also identified and then examined for citation frequency and lag time. Results: Citation analysis showed that the impact factor of Contact Dermatitis has increased significantly over the past 30 years, experiencing a sixfold improvement between 1977 and 2006. Conclusions: Bibliometric trends as identified in the current study clearly demonstrate the ongoing rise of Contact Dermatitis, from early beginnings in the mid-1970s, into the leading scientific periodical we know today. [source] Statistics and impact factor for Contact Dermatitis 2005CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2006T. Menné No abstract is available for this article. [source] 8th Congress of the European Society of Contact DermatitisCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 5 200516 September 200, Berlin, Germany No abstract is available for this article. [source] FS02.5 Nickel allergy and hand eczema , a twenty-year follow-upCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004Anna Josefson Aim:, To investigate the occurrence of hand eczema after 20 years in schoolgirls previously patch-tested to nickel. Methods:, In 1982,83, 960 schoolgirls, aged 8, 11 and 15 years, were investigated for the occurrence of nickel allergy (Larson-Stymne B and Widström L, Contact Dermatitis 1985:13:289,293). The girls were patch-tested and the prevalence of nickel allergy was 9%. Twenty years later, the same individuals have received a questionnaire regarding hand eczema and factors of importance for the development of hand eczema. After two reminders, the response rate was 81%. Results:, In total 17.5% of the girls reported hand eczema after the age of 15. The 1-year prevalence of hand eczema was 12.6%. Of the previously patch-tested schoolgirls who answered the questionnaire, 63 were sensitive to nickel. In this study, the prevalence of hand eczema among those 63 was 16%, compared to 17% in the non-sensitive group (NS). Excluding persons with atopic dermatitis, the prevalence of hand eczema was 12.5% in the nickel-sensitive group, and 10% among the others (NS). 32% of the persons who had had atopic dermatitis reported hand eczema after 15 years of age, compared to 10% of those with no history of atopic dermatitis (p < 0.001). Conclusion:, Contact allergy to nickel in early childhood (8,15 years) did not seem to increase the prevalence of hand eczema later in life. The prevalence of hand eczema was increased by a factor of three among those with a history of atopic dermatitis, which is in accordance with earlier reports. [source] FS13.2 Intervention on work-related skin problems among gut cleanersCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004Mari-Ann Flyvholm Work-related skin problems are frequent in the food processing industry. A randomised intervention study with a one-year follow up was carried out among gut cleaners in order to prevent work-related skin problems due to wet work. The effects of the intervention were primarily measured by telephone interviews using questionnaires based on a standardized questionnaire for work-related skin diseases and exposure (NOSQ-2002).* The intervention activities included an evidence-based prevention program and an evidence-based method for implementation. Six of the 18 participating departments were randomly assigned to the intervention group and the remaining 12 departments to the comparison group. A total of 644 employees responded in the baseline interview and 622 in the follow-up interview carried out a year later. The participation rates were 87,5% and 71,6% respectively. Among the 495 participants answering in both interviews the frequency of eczema on hands or forearms within the past 3 months was reduced significantly by more than 25% in the intervention departments. A minor increase was observed in the comparison departments. This study has shown that even in jobs without the possibility to reduce high exposure to wet work work-related skin problems can be reduced by proper preventive measures. *) Susitaival P, Flyvholm M-A, Meding B, Kanerva L, Lindberg M, Svensson Å, Ólafsson JH. Contact Dermatitis 2003;49:70,76. [source] P17 Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrolyzed wheat proteinCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004Olivia Bordalo Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) from hydrolysed wheat protein (HWP) is rarely reported in the literature. We describe 2 cases of ACD to this new allergen. Case1- A 39-year-old non atopic woman presented with a dermatitis of the face, mainly eyelids and neck. She had been using a new cosmetic cream for 2 months. The lesions subsided with topical corticosteroids. Patch tests with the standard, cosmetic, fragrance series and with her own products gave positive reactions only to the new cosmetic cream. We also tested all the components of this cream and only HWP gave a doubtful reaction with occlusive tests and positive reaction with ROAT. Case 2 , A 48-year-old atopic woman presented with a dermatitis of the face and hands for 1 month. She had been using a new cosmetic cream for 11 months and kept using the product without any suspicion. The dermatitis subsided with cetirizine and topical corticosteroids. Patch tests with the standard, cosmetic, fragrance series and her own products revealed positive reactions to the cosmetic cream. Again, testing all the components of the cream, only HWP gave doubtful reactions with occlusive tests and positive reactions with ROAT. Discussion:, In recent years, a number of protein hydrolysates have been introduced into cosmetic manufacture. HWP is being used in cosmetic creams for its moisturizing properties. As far as we know, there is only one previously reported case of ACD induced by this allergen. More cases may be expected. [source] Triclosan: A Potential Allergen in Suture-Line Allergic Contact DermatitisDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 5 2009TINA BHUTANI MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Letter: Benzyl Alcohol Preserved Saline Used to Dilute Injectables Poses a Risk of Contact Dermatitis in Fragrance-Sensitive PatientsDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 11 2007ANTOINE AMADO MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Pacemaker Contact Dermatitis: The Effective Use of a Polytetrafluoroethylene SheetPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2006KENSUKE ISHII M.D. A 52-year-old man with Down's syndrome was implanted with a DDDR pacemaker for advanced atrioventricular block. He was admitted with development of skin eczema and partial exposure of the generator 1 year after reimplantation. There was no evidence of infection on laboratory data. A skin patch test was positive for the metal of the generator (purity 99.9% titanium) after 72 hours. These findings indicated pacemaker contact dermatitis. After the patient was reimplanted with a pacemaker wrapped with a polytetrafluoroethylene sheet, there has been no recurrence of the contact dermatitis during a follow-up period of 3 years. [source] Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Chlorhexidine in a Very Young ChildPEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, Issue 5 2010Yannick Le Corre M.D. We report the observation of allergic contact dermatitis to chlorhexidine in a 23-month-old boy. [source] Contact dermatitis to polymyxin BCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 5 2008M. M. Jiaravuthisan No abstract is available for this article. [source] Contact dermatitis caused by latanoprost-containing eye drops with good tolerance to bimatoprost eye dropsCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 6 2008Eva Pérez-Rodríguez No abstract is available for this article. [source] Contact dermatitis from violet fragrance in a floristCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2007A. Callejo No abstract is available for this article. [source] Contact dermatitis around a tracheostoma due to salbutamol sulfate and Aldecin®CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 2 2006Daisuke Tsuruta Contact dermatitis around a tracheostoma is quite rare. So far, there have been only 2 reports about this in medical literature. We, in this study, report herewith contact dermatitis in a 61-year-old Japanese man around a tracheostoma due to salbutamol sulfate and Aldecin®. The patient used inhaled Sultanol® and Aldecin® for the treatment for allergic asthma. On examination, it was found that there was lichenified, exudative erythema with pigmentation around the tracheostoma. Patch testing with 1% aq. Sultanol® and Aldecin® revealed a positive reaction. Furthermore, patch testing for salbutamol sulfate 1% pet. also showed positive reaction. Although the contact allergen of our patient has not been fully determined (beclomethasone or other ingredients), this must be the first reported case of double contact dermatitis around a tracheostoma from salbutamol and Aldecin®. [source] FS01.2 Contact dermatitis to disperse blue 106 in PortugalCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004Francisco M Brandao Disperse blue 106 is one of the most important allergenic textile dyes. We reviewed all the patients that proved to be allergic to this dye, in 10 contact clinics, in Portugal, from 01/2000 to 06/2003. In the first 2 years disperse blue 106 was only tested in suspected cases, while in 2002/2003 it was routinely tested in our standard series. A total of 8957 patients (2797M + 6160F) were tested; fifty five patients (17M + 38F)(0.6%) were allergic to the dye, with a significant difference in incidence between the 2 periods (0.2 to 0.9%); a current relevance was found in 38 (69%) patients. In 5 patients the dermatitis was considered occupational. The main localizations were the axillae (25p), the antecubital fossae and the face (13p each), the neck (11p), the feet (8p), the hands and then trunk (7p each). Thirty six out of 44 patients (80%) that were tested with disperse blue 124 were allergic to this dye. Simultaneous reactions to PPDA and to fragrance mix were observed in 12 and 11 patients, respectively. Allergy to other dyes was found in 15 patients. Blouses and skirts were the main offending garments that induced contact allergy. Although both disperse blue 106 and 124 have been reported as frequent sensitizers, it proved not to be such an important allergen in Portugal. However, if tested routinely it can pick up some unexpected relevant allergic patients. [source] FS09.1 Diacetylmorphine (heroin) allergyCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004Aliet J Hogen Esch Since heroin is delivered to a selected group of drug addicts under supervision of nurses in the Netherlands, we reported about several nurses who presented with work-related eczema and positive patch tests to heroin. To investigate the prevalence of heroin contact allergy among all workers in this heroin delivery project, a study was started using questionnaires. Altogether 31 nurses reported work-related complaints out of 100 who returned questionnaires. Besides reports of eczema, mainly of eyelids (probably airborne) and hands, there were mucosal and respiratory complaints. Patch tests were performed in 25 nurses with complaints; in 9 of them a heroin contact allergy could be confirmed. In 6 out of these 9 nurses this was combined with mucosal or respiratory complaints. There were also 6 nurses with mucosal or respiratory complaints without a contact allergy. Contact dermatitis from opioids, such as morphine and codeine, has been documented among opioid industry workers, nurses, doctors, pharmacists, and in patients. In conclusion heroin appears to be a potent contact allergen, causing contact dermatitis. Mucosal and respiratory complaints however, cannot be explained by this contact allergy; they might be caused by a type-1-allergy to heroin, or by a direct histamine liberating effect. Opioids are known histamine liberators causing urticaria, rhinitis and anaphylactoid reactions; therefore intracutaneous tests with heroin are unreliable. In an ongoing research project it will be attempted to detect specific IgE to heroin in the 12 workers with mucosal or respiratory complaints; within the next few months results will be available. [source] P01 Contact dermatitis from textile colours in three Spanish townsCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004Begoña Garcia-Bravo Objective:, Prevalence of textile dye contact dermatitis (TD-CD) are lacking in many countries. Our aim is to know the frequency of TD-CD in three different areas of Spain. Methods:, 100 patients were tested with Spanish standard series and the five most frequent TD in each city. D. Orange 1, D. Orange 3, D. Blue 35, D. Blue 106, D. Blue 124 were included in Murcia and Seville, and the three last and D. Red 1, D. Red 17 in Santiago. Results:, 23/300 (15 women and 8 men) were positives to one or more TD. D. Blue 124 was the most frequent allergen (18/300), followed by D. Blue 106 (17/300). D. Red 1, D. Red 17 and D. Orange 1 were positives in 2/200. D. Orange 3 and D. Blue 35 were positives in 1/200. Eczema was located on hands in 13 cases. Clinical picture was variable. Origin of sensitization was clothing and occupational. Relevance was obtained in 20/23 cases. Conclusions:, The study confirm an high frequency of disperse dye allergy in Spain with a very different prevalence in the three areas: Seville 14%, Murcia 5% and Santiago 4%, that are probably due to social and cultural factors. We recommend the inclusion of D. Blue 106, D. Blue 124, D. Blue 35, D. Red 1, D. Red 17, D. Orange 1 and D. Orange 3 in standard series in order to detect sensitivity to textile colours that is most frequent than previously suspected. [source] P03 Type-I and -IV hypersensitivity to platinum saltsCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004Willeke Kamphof A 28-year-old female analytical chemist visited our patch test clinic with initially complaints of severe hand dermatitis. Later on she developed rhinitis, bronchial asthma and tightness of the chest. The complaints seemed work related: her condition improved during holidays and on sick leaves. She worked in a laboratory with several platinum salts and used different kinds of gloves (latex, nitril, etc.). Methods:, Patch tests were performed with the European Standard series and prick tests with common inhalant allergens. Patch-, prick- and open patch tests were carried out with various aqueous dilutions of platinum chloride (PtCl2). Results:, Patch tests with 0.01,2% PtCl2 were positive on day 2, 3 and 6, and at 0.001% a follicular reaction was found. The prick-test was already positive at the lowest concentration tested (0.001%). The open patch test, carried out retro-auricular, showed a positive reaction at 1 and 2% PtCl2 after 20 min. Controls in healthy volunteers (n = 5) were all negative. Discussion:, It is well known that platinum salts can cause type-I hypersensitivity reactions like allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis, bronchial asthma and urticaria, also referred to as platinosis. Contact dermatitis to platinum salts, however, is very rare. In our patch test clinic, 78 patients were tested between 1987 and 2001 with PtCl2 2%. Only 2 women showed a positive patch test for PtCl2. The patient presented here, stopped working with platinum salts and recovered from all complaints. We interpret our case as occupational type-I and type-IV hypersensitivity to platinum salts with mucosal and dermal manifestations. [source] Contact dermatitis due to disodium ethylenediamine- tetraacetic acid in cosmetics and shampooCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 2 2003Fujiko Soga No abstract is available for this article. [source] Contact dermatitis from the antimicrobial coating of a desk matCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 6 2003A. Gushi No abstract is available for this article. [source] Contact dermatitis in Korean dental techniciansCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 1 2001Jun Young Lee The high risk of occupational contact dermatitis in dental personnel are well accepted throughout the world. There are few reports concerning occupational skin disease in dental personnel in Korea. The purposes of this study were to investigate the frequency, characteristics and causative factors of contact dermatitis in Korean dental technicians. Recording of personal history, physical examination and patch tests with the Korean standard series and dental screening series were performed in 49 dental technicians. Most of the subjects were exposed to a variety of compounds, including acrylics, metals, plaster, alginate, etc. 22 (44.9%) subjects had contact dermatitis, present or past, and the site involved was the hand in all 22. The most common clinical feature of hand dermatitis was itching (77.3%); scaling, fissuring and erythema were other common clinical features. Metals, including potassium dichromate (24.5%), nickel sulfate (18.4%), mercury ammonium chloride (16.3%), cobalt chloride (12.2%) and palladium chloride (10.2%), showed high positive rates in patch test results of 49 dental technicians. 7 positive reactions to the various acrylics were found in 3 subjects. In our study, the frequency and clinical features of the contact dermatitis showed a similarity to other reports, though the patch test results were somewhat different; a higher patch-positive reaction to metals and a relatively lower patch-positive reaction to acrylics than the patch test results reported in Europe. [source] Contact dermatitis of the vulvaDERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, Issue 1 2004Lynette J. Margesson ABSTRACT:, Vulvar diseases rarely stand alone. They are often caused or worsened by primary irritant or allergic contact dermatitis, and this should be considered when evaluating any vulvar complaint. All irritants should be avoided in all women, and those with vulvar dermatoses should be patch tested to help define or rule out allergens. [source] Does contact dermatitis to fragrances influence the quality of life?FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNAL, Issue 4 2009A descriptive study measuring, comparing the quality of life, skin involvement in patients with contact dermatitis to fragrances Abstract The study of the impact of diseases on individuals' quality of life is an important and useful tool for clinicians, particularly for an efficient follow-up and for the good management of patients suffering from chronic diseases. Contact dermatitis is a common condition in dermatological patients. However, despite efficient screening, the understanding and acceptance of contact allergy remain difficult and avoidance of these allergens is not always possible. The aim of this study was to determine whether contact dermatitis to fragrances affects quality of life and to define whether there is a relationship between the severity of skin involvement and quality of life. To measure the quality of life, we chose the VQ-Dermato (VQ-d) questionnaire, the only valid and reliable questionnaire in French, to which we added 10 non-validated specific questions regarding fragrances. We included patients with pertinent positive patch test reactions to fragrances attending the contact clinic between 1 January 1998 and 30 September 2004. During this time, 2814 patients were patch tested and 310 had positive reactions to the fragrance mix 8% (FM) of the standard series. We recruited non-atopic individuals, exclusively allergic to fragrance mix, with patch test reactions scored ++ and +++; the only additional positive reactions accepted were to balsam of Peru and the patient's own perfumes; 52 patients met these criteria, but only 33 participated. To evaluate the severity of skin involvement, we used the severity scoring of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD index). The quality of life of individuals allergic to fragrances was mostly moderately affected. Patients were more affected psychologically during the first year after the diagnosis of fragrance allergy. Skin reaction during the acute stage of contact allergy to fragrances can be severe. No correlation between VQ-d and SCORAD could be established. It was concluded that there was no severe impact on quality of life because of fragrance contact allergy, but that psychological issues and depression may play an important role in determining the way skin disease affects people. Patch testing improves the quality of life. Lack of correlation between VQ-d and SCORAD demonstrates that an objective measure such as SCORAD may not fully capture the impact of the disease. These results cannot be generalized because of the low response rate and limited sample size. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Contact dermatitis to dimethylfumarate in armchairsALLERGY, Issue 5 2009P. Mercader No abstract is available for this article. [source] Allergic contact dermatitis caused by durable-press finishes does exist in the USACONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 4 2010Susan Nedorost No abstract is available for this article. [source] Allergic contact dermatitis caused by apomorphine hydrochloride in a carerCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 2 2010J. Garcia-Gavin No abstract is available for this article. [source] Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy.CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 1 2010Part 2. This is the second part of a review article on formaldehyde-releasers used as durable press chemical finishes (DPCF) in textiles. The early finishes contained large amounts of free formaldehyde, which led to many cases of allergic contact dermatitis to clothes in the 1950s and 1960s. Currently, most finishes are based on modified dimethylol dihydroxyethyleneurea, which releases less formaldehyde. Nevertheless, recent studies in the United States and Israel have identified patients reacting to DPCF, considered to have allergic contact reactions to clothes, either from formaldehyde released by the DPCF therein or from the DPCF per se (in patients negative to formaldehyde). However, all studies had some weaknesses in design or interpretation and in not a single case has the clinical relevance been proven. The amount of free formaldehyde in most garments will likely be below the threshold for the elicitation of dermatitis for all but the most sensitive patients. The amount of free cyclized urea DPCF in clothes is unlikely to be high enough to cause sensitization. Patch test reactions to formaldehyde-releasing DPCF will in most cases represent a reaction to formaldehyde released from the test material. [source] Occupational contact dermatitis caused by asparagusCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 1 2010Teruki Yanagi No abstract is available for this article. [source] Angioedema-like allergic contact dermatitis to castor oilCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 5 2010Inmaculada María Sánchez-Guerrero No abstract is available for this article. [source] Allergic contact dermatitis due to the , -blocker betaxolol in eyedrops, with cross-sensitivity to timololCONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 5 2010Massimiliano Nino No abstract is available for this article. [source] | |||||||||||||