Consecutive Recipients (consecutive + recipient)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Electrocardiogram-Based Algorithm to Predict the Left Ventricular Lead Position in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Systems

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2009
SYLVAIN PLOUX M.D.
Introduction: Biventricular pacing is associated with various electrocardiographic patterns depending on the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead. We aimed to develop an electrocardiogram-based algorithm to predict the position of the LV lead. Methods: The algorithm was developed in 100 consecutive recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems. QRS axis, morphology, and polarity were analyzed with a view to define the specific electrocardiographic characteristics associated with the various LV lead positions. The algorithm was prospectively validated in 50 consecutive CRT device recipients. Results: The first analysis of the algorithm was the QRS morphology in V1. A positive R wave in V1 suggested LV lateral or posterior wall stimulation. A QS pattern was specific of anterior LV leads. In the presence of an R wave in V1, V6 was analyzed to distinguish between an inferior and anterior LV lead. Inferior leads were never associated with a positive V6. To differentiate between lateral and posterior positions, we analyzed the pattern in V2. Lateral leads were associated with an R morphology in V1 and a negative V2. Posterior leads were associated with an R morphology in V1 and V2. The algorithm allowed a reliable distinction between an inferior or anterior and a lateral or posterior lead position in 90% of patients. Inferior, anterior, lateral, and posterior positions were reliably distinguished in 80% of patients. Conclusion: This algorithm predicted the position of the LV lead with a high sensitivity and predictive value. [source]


Screening to Prevent Polyoma Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A Cost Analysis

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2009
F. Smith
Polyoma virus nephropathy is an important cause of graft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients and screening to prevent disease has been advocated. Although screening incurs new costs, our hypothesis is that savings from less immunosuppression in those with positive screening tests could pay for overall costs of screening. In 134 consecutive recipients, polyoma virus (positive decoy cells) was detected in the urine of 34 (25.4%) individuals over a 2-year follow-up. Of these 34, 11 had a plasma BK PCR of >7700 copies/mL. Immunosuppression was reduced stepwise in these patients until viral loads fell <1000/mL. Overall screening costs (including extra plasma PCR testing) were estimated at $33 450. Those with positive PCR had greater reductions in annual immunosuppression costs by year 2 ($6452 vs. $2799, p = 0.0015) compared to those with negative screens. At the end of the 2-year period, 61% of the screening costs were covered by less immunosuppressant costs. At the end of 30 months there were net savings. In summary, reductions in immunosuppression cover the cost of screening for polyoma viral infection. Longer-term follow-up is needed to ensure patient outcomes remain acceptable. [source]


Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Living ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Long-Term Impact and Risk Factors

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2009
D. Toki
The impact of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR) on the long-term outcome on ABO-incompatible (ABOI) kidney transplantation is not well understood. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term impact of AAMR and risk factors for AAMR in 57 consecutive recipients performed between 1999 and 2004. Nineteen patients (33%) who developed AAMR within 3 months posttransplantation constituted of the AMR group. The graft survival rate was significantly lower in the AMR group (AMR vs. non-AMR, respectively; 5 years: 84% vs. 95%; 8 years: 45% vs. 95%; p = 0.009). The prevalence of transplant glomerulopathy at 1 year posttransplantation was significantly higher in the AMR group (AMR 64% vs. non-AMR 3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anti-blood group IgG antibody titers of 1:32 at the time of transplantation (OR, 9.52; p = 0.041) and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSHA) detected by Luminex single bead method (OR, 5.68; p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for AAMR regardless of baseline anti-blood group IgG antibody titers. Our results indicate that AAMR has a heavy impact on the long-term outcome and preoperative DSHA appears to have a more significant association with poor graft outcomes than anti-blood group antibodies, even in ABOI kidney transplantation. [source]


A Randomized, Prospective Trial of Rituximab for Acute Rejection in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2008
V. Zarkhin
We report 1-year outcomes of a randomized study of Rituximab versus standard-of-care immunosuppression (Thymoglobulin and/or pulse steroids) for treatment of biopsy confirmed, acute transplant rejection with B-cell infiltrates, in 20 consecutive recipients (2,23 years). Graft biopsies, with Banff and CADI scores, CD20 and C4d stains, were performed at rejection and 1 and 6 months later. Peripheral blood CMV, EBV and BK viral loads, graft function, DSA, immunoglobulins, serum humanized antichimeric antibody (HACA) and Rituximab, and lymphocyte counts were monitored until 1 year posttreatment. Rituximab infusions were given with a high index of safety without HACA development and increased infections complications. Rituximab therapy resulted in complete tissue B-cell depletion and rapid peripheral B-cell depletion. Peripheral CD19 cells recovered at a mean time of ,12 months. There were some benefits for the recovery of graft function (p = 0.026) and improvement of biopsy rejection scores at both the 1- (p = 0.0003) and 6-month (p < 0.0001) follow-up biopsies. Reappearance of C4d deposition was not seen on follow-up biopsies after Rituximab therapy, but was seen in 30% of control patients. There was no change in DSA in either group, independent of rejection resolution. This study reports safety and suggests further investigation of Rituximab as an adjunctive treatment for B-cell-mediated graft rejection. [source]