			Home About us Contact

Action Monitoring (action + monitoring)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Psychology	85%

Selected Abstracts

Action monitoring in motor control: ERPs following selection and execution errors in a force production task

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2003
Ellen R. A. De Bruijn
Abstract Action monitoring has been studied in many tasks by means of measuring the error-related negativity (Ne/ERN), but never in a motor control task requiring precise force production. Errors in discrete choice reaction tasks are the result of incorrect selections, but errors in force production can also arise from incorrect executions. ERPs were obtained while participants produced low or high isometric forces with their left or right hand. As expected, incorrect choices of hand elicited an Ne/ERN. Interestingly, Ne/ERNs were also present in the less discrete selection error of an incorrect choice of force, but only when erroneously a low instead of a high force was chosen. In both force ranges, no Ne/ERNs were found after errors in execution. These errors showed a large positivity in feedback ERPs and, similar to correct responses, a prolonged negativity in response ERPs. We propose that, compared to selection errors, the time uncertainty aspects of execution errors and the resulting changing response representations prohibit error detection by the internal monitoring system responsible for generating the Ne/ERN. [source]

Maturation of action monitoring from adolescence to adulthood: an ERP study

DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, Issue 6 2005
Alexandra M. Hogan
This study investigated the development of the frontal lobe action-monitoring system from late childhood and adolescence to early adulthood using ERP markers of error processing. Error negativity (ERN) and correct response negativity (CRN) potentials were recorded while adolescents and adults (aged 12,22 years, n = 23) performed two forced-choice visual reaction time tasks of differing complexity. Significant age differences were seen for behavioural and ERP responses to complex (infrequent, incompatible) trials: adolescents elicited an error negativity of reduced magnitude compared with adults. Furthermore, in contrast to adults, adolescents showed a non-significant differentiation between response-locked ERP components elicited by correct (CRN) and error responses (ERN). Behaviourally, adolescents corrected fewer errors in incompatible trials, and with increasing age there was greater post-error slowing. In conclusion, the neural systems underlying action-monitoring continue to mature throughout the second decade of life, and are associated with increased efficiency for fast error detection and correction during complex tasks. [source]

Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, Issue 3 2009
Frank Van Overwalle
Abstract This meta-analysis explores the location and function of brain areas involved in social cognition, or the capacity to understand people's behavioral intentions, social beliefs, and personality traits. On the basis of over 200 fMRI studies, it tests alternative theoretical proposals that attempt to explain how several brain areas process information relevant for social cognition. The results suggest that inferring temporary states such as goals, intentions, and desires of other people,even when they are false and unjust from our own perspective,strongly engages the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). Inferring more enduring dispositions of others and the self, or interpersonal norms and scripts, engages the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), although temporal states can also activate the mPFC. Other candidate tasks reflecting general-purpose brain processes that may potentially subserve social cognition are briefly reviewed, such as sequence learning, causality detection, emotion processing, and executive functioning (action monitoring, attention, dual task monitoring, episodic memory retrieval), but none of them overlaps uniquely with the regions activated during social cognition. Hence, it appears that social cognition particularly engages the TPJ and mPFC regions. The available evidence is consistent with the role of a TPJ-related mirror system for inferring temporary goals and intentions at a relatively perceptual level of representation, and the mPFC as a module that integrates social information across time and allows reflection and representation of traits and norms, and presumably also of intentionality, at a more abstract cognitive level. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Heritability of frontal brain function related to action monitoring

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2008
Andrey P. Anokhin
Abstract Monitoring the correspondence between the intended and actually executed action, a fundamental mechanism of behavioral regulation, is reflected by error-related negativity (ERN), an ERP component generated by the anterior cingulate cortex. This study examined genetic influences on the ERN and other components related to action monitoring (correct negativity, CRN, and error positivity, Pe). A flanker task was administered to adolescent twins (age 12) including 99 monozygotic (MZ) and 175 dizygotic (DZ) pairs. Genetic analysis showed substantial heritability of all three ERP components (40%,60%) and significant genetic correlations between them. This study provides the first evidence for heritable individual differences in the neural substrates of action monitoring and suggests that ERN, CRN, and Pe can potentially serve as endophenotypes for genetic studies of personality traits and psychopathology associated with abnormal regulation of behavior. [source]

Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: Evidence from an antisaccade task

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001
Sander Nieuwenhuis
The error negativity (Ne/ERN) and error positivity (Pe) are two components of the event-related brain potential (ERP) that are associated with action monitoring and error detection. To investigate the relation between error processing and conscious self-monitoring of behavior, the present experiment examined whether an Ne and Pe are observed after response errors of which participants are unaware. Ne and Pe measures, behavioral accuracy, and trial-to-trial subjective accuracy judgments were obtained from participants performing an antisaccade task, which elicits many unperceived, incorrect reflex-like saccades. Consistent with previous research, subjectively unperceived saccade errors were almost always immediately corrected, and were associated with faster correction times and smaller saccade sizes than perceived errors. Importantly, irrespective of whether the participant was aware of the error or not, erroneous saccades were followed by a sizable Ne. In contrast, the Pe was much more pronounced for perceived than for unperceived errors. Unperceived errors were characterized by the absence of posterror slowing. These and other results are consistent with the view that the Ne and Pe reflect the activity of two separate error monitoring processes, of which only the later process, reflected by the Pe, is associated with conscious error recognition and remedial action. [source]