Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Combination Therapy (combination + therapy)
Kinds of Combination Therapy Selected AbstractsCOMBINATION THERAPY FOR POSTPRANDIAL AND ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION IN AN ELDERLY PATIENT WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUSJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 4 2006Naomune Yamamoto MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] EFFECT OF COMBINATION THERAPY (ANG II ANTAGONIST, VALSARTAN AND A CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER) IN A HYPERTENSIVE MODEL OF DIABETIC NEPHROPATHYNEPHROLOGY, Issue 3 2000Allen Tj Davis Bj [source] Newer Combination Therapies in the Management of Hypertension: An UpdateJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 5 2008Alan H. Gradman MD A panel was convened to discuss current combination therapy for hypertension. Alan H. Gradman, MD, of the Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Temple University School of Medicine (Clinical Campus), Pittsburgh, PA, moderated the discussion. Participants included Matthew R. Weir, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and George L. Bakris, MD, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. [source] Beyond the Usual Strategies for Blood Pressure Reduction: Therapeutic Considerations and Combination TherapiesJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 6 2001Thomas D. Giles MD Rapidly accumulating clinical data have repeatedly demonstrated not only the critical importance of even small increases in blood pressure as a pathophysiologic factor in the development of cardiovascular disease, particularly in individuals with diabetes mellitus, but also the therapeutic necessity of more aggressive blood pressure reduction and the achievement of progressively lower blood pressure targets in reducing cardiovascular event rates. JNC VI has defined optimal blood pressure as ,120/80 mm Hg, and Stage 1 hypertension as ,140/80 mm Hg. Target blood pressures are now ,130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes and <125/75 mm Hg for patients with hypertensive renal disease with proteinuria of>1 gm/24 hours. Achieving such target pressures is increasingly difficult, particularly in diabetic patients with chronic renal disease, who require complex multidrug antihypertensive regimens. This review attempts to provide some suggestions for constructing such antihypertensive regimens, and provides considerations for the appropriate use of diuretics and the most effective drug combinations. Factors potentially contributing to drug resistant hypertension include such problems as failure to maximize drug dosing, suboptimal diuretic use, noncompliance, and possible confounding effects of such concomitant medications as nonsteroidal and anti-inflammatory drugs or decongestants. The issues underlying drug-resistant hypertension are listed, together with strategies for overcoming this problem. [source] Topiramate and Phenytoin Pharmacokinetics During Repetitive Monotherapy and Combination Therapy to Epileptic PatientsEPILEPSIA, Issue 10 2002Rajesh C. Sachdeo No abstract is available for this article. [source] Rational Combination Therapy in Refractory MigraineHEADACHE, Issue 6 2008B. Lee Peterlin DO Refractory migraine (RM) headaches pose important treatment challenges to the patients who live with them and the clinicians who try to treat them. Defined based on the lack of response to acute, preventive, and nonpharmacologic treatment, RM is often treated with a combination of treatments. Although combination therapy for RM has not been systematically studied in randomized trials, clinical experience suggests that a rational approach to RM treatment, utilizing a combination of treatments, may be effective where monotherapy has failed. In this article we briefly identify patient populations appropriate for more aggressive migraine prevention with combination therapy. We then discuss modifiable risk factors and comorbidities in migraine and then focus on the use of rational combination therapy, as well as the duration migraine preventatives should be considered for use. Future research is needed to evaluate the full potential of rational combination treatment as a strategy for treating and ultimately preventing RM. [source] Shifting Paradigms in Defining and Treating Hypertension: Addressing Global Risk With Combination TherapyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 2008Jan Basile MD Guest Editor No abstract is available for this article. [source] Risk-Based Classification of Hypertension and the Role of Combination TherapyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 2008Matthew R. Weir MD The recognition of a continuous relationship between elevated blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular risk has influenced national and international guidelines for the classification, prevention, and management of hypertension. The most recent report (2003) of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure uses BP thresholds to define categories of normal, prehypertension, and hypertension. A new definition proposed by the Hypertension Writing Group in 2005 offers an approach to diagnosis and management based on global or total risk. Thus, even in the absence of sustained elevations in BP, patients may have a moderate to high risk of vascular events due to the presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors, disease markers, and target organ damage. The 2007 European guidelines continue to classify hypertension based on cutoffs while also placing emphasis on multivariate formulations for cardiovascular risk assessment and goals of therapy. All 3 sets of guidelines acknowledge the necessity of using ,2 antihypertensive agents to attain BP goals in many patients. [source] The Evolution of Combination Therapy in Treating HypertensionJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 2007Michael A. Weber MD First page of article [source] Emerging Insights in the First-Step Use of Antihypertensive Combination TherapyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 2007Keith Norris MD The blood pressure (BP) goals set by hypertension management guidelines (<140/90 mm Hg in uncomplicated hypertension; <130/80 mm Hg in type 2 diabetes or kidney disease) are not being achieved in a high proportion of patients, partly because monotherapy is insufficient in many patients. In particular, patients with uncontrolled moderate or severe hypertension and/or associated cardiovascular risk factors remain at high risk for cardiovascular events and hypertensive emergency. In recognition of the urgency of treating moderate and severe hypertension, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) advocates the initial use of 2-drug therapies in patients with systolic BP levels >20 mm Hg above goal or diastolic BP level >10 mm Hg above goal. Regimens should usually include a thiazide diuretic and, for patients with diabetes or kidney disease, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. Recently, clinical trial data have shown that first-step antihypertensive treatment of moderate and severe hypertension with carefully chosen fixed-dose combinations provides a high rate of BP goal achievement, a simplified dosing regimen, and superior tolerability compared with monotherapy. [source] Dihydropyridine/Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Combination TherapyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 1 2005Joel Handler MD First page of article [source] Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy,Is It Time for This Approach to Hypertension and Dyslipidemia Management?JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 4 2004Domenic A. Sica MD Senior Editor First page of article [source] Achieving Blood Pressure Goals: Is Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy the Answer?JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 4 2003George L. Bakris MD Guest Editor No abstract is available for this article. [source] Low-Dose Combination Therapy: Why Include a Diuretic?JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 5 2001Edward D. Freis MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Combination Therapy with Digoxin and Diltiazem Controls Ventricular Rate in Chronic Atrial Fibrillation in Dogs Better than Digoxin or Diltiazem Monotherapy: A Randomized Crossover Study in 18 DogsJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 3 2009A.R.M. Gelzer Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) with excessively high ventricular rates (VR) occurs in dogs with advanced heart disease. Rate control improves clinical signs in these patients. Optimal drug therapy and target VR remain poorly defined. Hypothesis: Digoxin-diltiazem combination therapy reduces VR more than either drug alone in dogs with high VR AF. Animals: Eighteen client-owned dogs (>15 kg) with advanced heart disease, AF, and average VR on 24-hour Holter > 140 beats per minute (bpm). Methods: After baseline Holter recording, dogs were randomized to digoxin or diltiazem monotherapy, or combination therapy. Repeat Holter evaluation was obtained after 2 weeks; dogs were then crossed over to the other arm (monotherapy or combination therapy) for 2 weeks and a third Holter was acquired. Twenty-four hour average VR, absolute and relative VR changes from baseline, and percent time spent within prespecified VR ranges (>140, 100,140, and <100 bpm) were compared. Correlations between serum drug concentrations and VR were examined. Results: Digoxin (median, 164 bpm) and diltiazem (median, 158 bpm) decreased VR from baseline (median, 194 bpm) less than the digoxin-diltiazem combination (median, 126 bpm) (P < .008 for each comparison). With digoxin-diltiazem, VR remained <140 bpm for 85% of the recording period, but remained >140 bpm for 88% of the recording period with either monotherapy. Serum drug concentrations did not correlate with VR. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: At the dosages used in this study, digoxin-diltiazem combination therapy provided a greater rate control than either drug alone in dogs with AF. [source] Practical Considerations in Acne Treatment and the Clinical Impact of Topical Combination TherapyPEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, Issue 2008Andrew C. Krakowski M.D. The effects of acne are profound both physically and psychosocially across all age groups and ethnicities; therefore, prompt recognition and appropriate treatment are critical. Pharmacotherapeutic approaches range from simple monotherapy to multimodal treatments with a variety of topical and systemic agents. Optimal patient outcomes in acne management, however, are based both on treatment efficacy as well as overall patient satisfaction. In an effort to comprehensively address these key clinical considerations in acne management, we examine the diverse nature of acne patients, the factors in optimizing treatment outcomes, and the clinical impact of current medications, particularly topical combination therapy. [source] Albendazole: Single or Combination Therapy with Permethrin against Pediculosis CapitisPEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, Issue 2 2006Ciler Akisu M.D. In the present study, we investigated whether albendazole could be used in the treatment of pediculosis capitis in combination with 1% permethrin or alone. A total of 150 children were randomly divided to five groups of 30 each. Group 1 got albendazole in a single dose (400 mg), group 2 got albendazole at 400 mg for 3 days, group 3 was given 1% permethrin, group 4 took 1% permethrin and albendazole in a single dose (400 mg), and group 5 got 1% permethrin and albendazole in a dose of 400 mg for 3 days. Groups given albendazole were also given another 400 mg dose of albendazole after 1 week. The success rate of treatment at the 2-week follow-up for all groups was 61.5%, 66.6%, 80.0%, 84.6%, and 82.1%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups. The results of this study suggest that albendazole is effective against pediculosis capitis and there is no synergistic effect between albendazole and 1% permethrin. [source] Intensive Statin Treatment or Combination Therapy in High-Risk PatientsPREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2007Wilbert S. Aronow MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Benefit of Sustained Virological Response to Combination Therapy on Graft Survival of Liver Transplanted Patients with Recurrent Chronic Hepatitis CAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2005Thierry Bizollon Recurrent hepatitis C infection is an important cause of progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis and graft loss after liver transplantation. Treatment for post-transplant recurrence results in sustained virological response (SVR) in up to 30% of cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SVR on patients and graft survival. Thirty-four patients with an SVR to IFN-ribavirin were included. Forty-six nonresponders to the combination formed the control group. Follow-up data were recorded every 6 months and included HCV RNA, and the occurrence of clinical problems (cirrhosis, decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, death). A graft biopsy was performed every year. The mean follow-up duration was 52 months in responders and 57 months in nonresponders. Two patients died in each group of patients. Two patients with SVR developed late virological relapse. Fibrosis decreased in 38% of patients with SVR, remained stable in 44% and worsened in 18%. In contrast, fibrosis increased in the majority of nonresponder patients (74%, p < 0.001). At the end of follow-up, no patient without cirrhosis at inclusion developed cirrhosis of the graft versus 9 among nonresponder patients (p = 0.009). No difference in patient survival was observed in the two groups. In conclusion, this study shows that HCV eradication has a positive impact on graft survival. [source] From Apheresis for the Preparation of Ventricular Assist Devices and Transplantation to Combination Therapy of Apheresis and Ventricular Assist Devices for Myocardial RepairARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 1 2009PhD Emeritus Editor-in-Chief, Yukihiko Nosé MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Utility-Based Optimization of Combination Therapy Using Ordinal Toxicity and Efficacy in Phase I/II TrialsBIOMETRICS, Issue 2 2010Nadine Houede Summary An outcome-adaptive Bayesian design is proposed for choosing the optimal dose pair of a chemotherapeutic agent and a biological agent used in combination in a phase I/II clinical trial. Patient outcome is characterized as a vector of two ordinal variables accounting for toxicity and treatment efficacy. A generalization of the Aranda-Ordaz model (1981,,Biometrika,68, 357,363) is used for the marginal outcome probabilities as functions of a dose pair, and a Gaussian copula is assumed to obtain joint distributions. Numerical utilities of all elementary patient outcomes, allowing the possibility that efficacy is inevaluable due to severe toxicity, are obtained using an elicitation method aimed to establish consensus among the physicians planning the trial. For each successive patient cohort, a dose pair is chosen to maximize the posterior mean utility. The method is illustrated by a trial in bladder cancer, including simulation studies of the method's sensitivity to prior parameters, the numerical utilities, correlation between the outcomes, sample size, cohort size, and starting dose pair. [source] Balancing Risk and Benefit with Oral Hypoglycemic DrugsMOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE: A JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, Issue 3 2009Ole-Petter R. Hamnvik MB Abstract Clinicians are faced with an expansive array of treatment choices when caring for patients with type 2 diabetes. Because patient compliance may be affected when media sensationalism about controversial findings is misunderstood, we sought to clarify the recent controversy surrounding the cardiovascular and bone-health risks of thiazolidinediones, the risk of lactic acidosis with metformin, and the risk of hypoglycemia with oral therapies. The side effect profile of thiazolidinediones includes fluid retention, heart failure; and an increased risk of fracture. A recent controversial meta-analysis suggested that rosiglitazone increases the risk of myocardial infarction, which is possibly related to thiazolidinedione-induced lipid changes, weight gain, congestive heart failure, and anemia. Metformin is restricted to patients with normal renal function because of concerns that metformin may cause lactic acidosis. However, few cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis have been reported, and most have occurred in patients with other reasons for developing lactic acidosis, such as sepsis or renal failure. Although the use of metformin continues to increase, observational studies have not been able to demonstrate an increased incidence of lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients, even when it is used in populations with relative contraindications. Some oral hypoglycemic medications can cause hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia is especially common in older patients, alcoholics, and patients with liver or renal disease. Patients on sulfonylureas and meglitinides have the highest incidence of hypoglycemia because of their pharmacological action of increasing insulin secretion. Of the sulfonylureas, glyburide presents the highest risk of hypoglycemia. Combination therapies, especially those regimens containing a sulfonylurea, increase the risk of hypoglycemia. Mt Sinai J Med 76:234,243, 2009. © 2009 Mount Sinai School of Medicine [source] Novel Approach to the Treatment of Hyperpigmented Photodamaged Skin: 4% Hydroquinone/0.3% Retinol versus Tretinoin 0.05% Emollient CreamDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 2005Zoe Diana Draelos MD Background. Mild to moderately photodamaged skin is characterized by dyspigmentation, fine wrinkles, and tactile roughness. An optimal approach to the topical treatment of photoaging would simultaneously address all appearance issues. Objective. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of 4% hydroquinone and 0.3% retinol in photoaging. Materials and Methods. A 16-week study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a single cream containing prescription topical 4% hydroquinone for dyspigmentation and the cosmeceutical 0.3% retinol for fine wrinkles in an emollient vehicle for tactile roughness. This novel formulation was compared with 0.05% tretinoin emollient cream, the standard against which all other topical photoaging treatments are compared. Investigator assessments, subject assessments, and photography represented the evaluation end points. Results. The cosmeceutical emollient 4% hydroquinone/0.3% retinol cream more effectively diminished the collective signs of photodamage than 0.05% tretinoin emollient cream in terms of dyspigmentation, fine wrinkles, and tactile roughness in 16 weeks. Conclusion. Combination therapy of hydroquinone and retinol may improve photoaging-associated hyperpigmentation. THIS STUDY WAS CONDUCTED AS PART OF A RESEARCH GRANT FROM MEDICIS THE DERMATOLOGY COMPANY, PHOENIX, ARIZONA. DR. DRAELOS HAS NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN ANY OF THE MEDICATIONS DISCUSSED IN THIS RESEARCH. [source] Combination therapy using metformin or thiazolidinediones and insulin in the treatment of diabetes mellitusDIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, Issue 6 2005Suzanne M. Strowig The biguanide, metformin, sensitizes the liver to the effect of insulin, suppressing hepatic glucose output. Thiazolidinediones such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone enhance insulin-mediated glucose disposal, leading to reduced plasma insulin concentrations. These classes of drugs may also have varying beneficial effects on features of insulin resistance such as lipid levels, blood pressure and body weight. Metformin in combination with insulin has been shown to significantly improve blood glucose levels while lowering total daily insulin dose and body weight. The thiazolidinediones in combination with insulin have also been effective in lowering blood glucose levels and total daily insulin dose. Triple combination therapy using insulin, metformin and a thiazolidinedione improves glycaemic control to a greater degree than dual therapy using insulin and metformin or insulin and a thiazolidinedione. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of metformin or thiazolidinediones in type 1 diabetic patients. Although these agents are largely well tolerated, some subjects experience significant gastrointestinal problems while using metformin. Metformin is associated with a low risk of lactic acidosis, but should not be used in patients with elevated serum creatinine or those being treated for congestive heart failure. The thiazolidinediones are associated with an increase in body weight, although this can be avoided with careful lifestyle management. Thiazolidinediones may also lead to oedema and are associated with a low incidence of hepatocellular injury. Thiazolidinediones are contraindicated in patients with underlying heart disease who are at risk of congestive heart failure and in patients who have abnormal hepatic function. The desired blood glucose-lowering effect and adverse event profiles of these agents should be considered when recommending these agents to diabetic patients. The potential for metformin or the thiazolidinediones to impact long-term cardiovascular outcomes remains under investigation. [source] Synergistic Combinations of Anticonvulsant Agents: What Is the Evidence from Animal Experiments?EPILEPSIA, Issue 3 2007Daniël M. Jonker Summary:,Purpose: Combination therapy is often used in the treatment of seizures refractory to monotherapy. At the same time, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms that determine the combined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unknown, and this prevents a rational use of these drug combinations. We critically evaluate the existing evidence for pharmacodynamic synergism between AEDs from preclinical studies in animal models of epilepsy to identify useful combinations of mechanisms and to determine whether study outcome depends on the various research methods that are in use. Methods: Published articles were included if the studies were placebo-controlled, in vivo, or ex vivo animal studies investigating marketed or experimental AEDs. The animal models that were used in these studies, the primary molecular targets of the tested drugs, and the methods of interpretation were recorded. The potential association of these factors with the study outcome (synergism: yes or no) was assessed through logistic regression analysis. Results: In total, 107 studies were identified, in which 536 interaction experiments were conducted. In 54% of these experiments, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not investigated. The majority of studies were conducted in the maximal electroshock model, and other established models were the pentylenetetrazole model, amygdala kindling, and the DBA/2 model. By far the most widely used method for interpretation of the results was evaluation of the effect of a threshold dose of one agent on the median effective dose (ED50) of another agent. Experiments relying on this method found synergism significantly more often compared with experiments relying on other methods (p < 0.001). Furthermore, experiments including antagonists of the AMPA receptor were more likely to find synergism in comparison with all other experiments (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intensive preclinical research into the effects of AED combinations has not led to an understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of AED combinations. Specifically, the majority of the preclinical studies are not adequately designed to distinguish between additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions. Quantitative pharmacokinetic,pharmacodynamic studies of selectively acting AEDs in a battery of animal models are necessary for the development of truly synergistic drug combinations. [source] In vivo tumor cell rejection induced by NK cell inhibitory receptor blockade: Maintained tolerance to normal cells even in the presence of IL-2EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, Issue 3 2010Gustaf Vahlne Abstract Missing-self-reactivity can be mimicked by blocking self-specific inhibitory receptors on NK cells, leading to increased rejection of syngeneic tumor cells. Using a mouse model, we investigated whether Ab-mediated blocking of inhibitory receptors, to a degree where NK cells rejected syngeneic tumor cells, would still allow self-tolerance toward normal syngeneic cells. Ly49C/I inhibitory receptors on C57BL/6 (H-2b) NK cells were blocked with F(ab')2 fragments of the mAb 5E6. Inhibitory receptor blockade in vivo caused rejection of i.v. inoculated fluorescence-labeled syngeneic lymphoma line cells but not of syngeneic spleen cells, BM cells or lymphoblasts. The selective rejection of tumor cells was NK cell-dependent and specifically induced by Ly49C/I blockade. Moreover, selective tumor rejection was maintained after treatment with 5E6 F(ab')2 for 9 wk, arguing against the induction of NK cell anergy or autoreactivity during this time. Combination therapy using 5E6 F(ab')2 together with high dose IL-2 treatment further increased lymphoma cell rejection. In addition, combination therapy reduced growth of melanoma cell line tumors established by s.c. inoculation 3 days before start of treatment. Our results demonstrate that inhibitory receptor blockade does not result in attack on normal cells, despite potent reactivity against MHC class I-expressing tumors. [source] Combination of low-dose mirtazapine and ibuprofen for prophylaxis of chronic tension-type headacheEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 2 2007L. Bendtsen Chronic headaches are difficult to treat and represent the biggest challenge in headache centres. Mirtazapine has a prophylactic and ibuprofen an acute effect in tension-type headache. Combination therapy may increase efficacy and lower side effects. We aimed to evaluate the prophylactic effect of a combination of low-dose mirtazapine and ibuprofen in chronic tension-type headache. Ninety-three patients were included in the double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. Following a 4-week run-in period they were randomized to four groups for treatment with a combination of mirtazapine 4.5 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg, placebo, mirtazapine 4.5 mg or ibuprofen 400 mg daily for 8 weeks. Eighty-four patients completed the study. The primary efficacy parameter, change in area under the headache curve from run-in to the last 4 weeks of treatment, did not differ between combination therapy (190) and placebo (219), P = 0.85. Explanatory analyses revealed worsening of headache already in the third week of treatment with ibuprofen alone. In conclusion, the combination of low-dose mirtazapine and ibuprofen is not effective for the treatment of chronic tension-type headache. Moreover, the study suggests that daily intake of ibuprofen worsens headache already after few weeks in chronic tension-type headache. [source] Combination therapy with ribavirin and interferon in a cohort of children with hepatitis C and haemophilia followed at a pediatric haemophilia treatment centerHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 1 2004J. Puetz Summary., Nearly all children with bleeding disorders who received factor concentrates prior to the late 1980s were infected with hepatitis C. Treatment of adults infected with hepatitis C with combination therapy consisting of ribavirin and interferon has shown sustained response rates of 30,60%. Little data is available on the response of children infected with hepatitis C treated with combination therapy, especially those with bleeding disorders. We wish to report a single paediatric haemophilia treatment center's results of treatment of adolescents with haemophilia and hepatitis C infection with combination therapy. All patients followed at the haemophilia treatment center with hepatitis C, who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative and had a measurable hepatitis C viral load were eligible. Study patients received at least 6 months of 3 MU interferon- , via subcutaneous injection three times per week and 1000 mg day,1 of ribavirin. Eleven patients agreed to participate in the study. Three patients had an un measurable viral load after 6 months of combination therapy. All three completed 12 months of medication and continued to remain free of hepatitis C for 12 months after discontinuation of therapy. Side-effects of combination therapy were significant but tolerable. The sustained response rate in this study is similar to the historical response rate seen in adults but less than the other reported response rates seen in children treated with combination therapy. Given the toxicity of combination therapy, and natural history of hepatitis C infection in children, consideration of a liver biopsy to evaluate disease progression prior to considering antiviral medications is warranted. [source] Combination therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir for chronic hepatitis B,infected Chinese patients: A viral dynamics studyHEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2000George Ka Lau M.D. In vitro studies have shown that lamivudine and penciclovir (the active metabolite of famciclovir) act synergistically to inhibit hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. We compared the effectiveness of HBV viral suppression by lamivudine monotherapy versus lamivudine plus famciclovir combination therapy in Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection. Twenty-one Chinese hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, with detectable HBV DNA (Digene Hybrid Capture II), were randomized to receive either lamivudine 150 mg/d orally (group 1, 9 patients) or lamivudine 150 mg/d plus famciclovir 500 mg 3 times a day orally (group 2, 12 patients) for 12 weeks, with a follow-up period of at least 16 weeks. Serial serum HBV-DNA levels were determined and a mathematical model with provision for incomplete inhibition of virus production during therapy was applied to analyze the dynamics of viral clearance. The mean antiviral efficacy was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 (0.988 ± 0.012 vs. 0.94 ± 0.03, P = .0012). HBV DNA returned to pretreatment level within 16 weeks after the end of initial treatment in 4 patients (66.7%) in group 1 and none in group 2 (P = .08), who remained HBeAg positive and received no further treatment after week 12. Hence, in Chinese chronic HBeAg-positive patients, combination therapy using lamivudine and famciclovir was superior to lamivudine monotherapy in inhibiting HBV replication. Further studies of longer duration are needed to define whether combination therapy will increase the HBeAg seroconversion rate and decrease the rate of emergence of lamivudine-resistant variants. [source] Evaluation of newly developed combination therapy of intra-arterial 5-fluorouracil and systemic pegylated interferon ,-2b for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal venous invasion: preliminary resultsHEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, Issue 2 2009Kazuhiro Kasai Aim:, Prognosis is extremely poor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with portal invasion. The present study evaluated the efficacy of combined intra-arterial 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and systemic pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN),-2b in patients with advanced HCC. Methods:, The subjects comprised nine HCC patients with portal vein thrombosis treated using subcutaneous administration of PEG-IFN,-2b (50,100 µg on day 1 of every week, for 4 weeks) and intra-arterial infusion of 5-FU (250 mg/day for 5 h on days 1,5 of every week, for 4 weeks). For four patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, oral administration of ribavirin (400,800 mg/day) was added. At the end of every cycle, response to therapy was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. Results:, Partial response (PR) was observed in seven of nine patients, with stable or progressive disease in the remaining two patients. Tumors were resectable in three patients displaying PR after treatment. Tumor markers decreased significantly after therapy. Serum HCV-RNA titers were markedly decreased and became undetectable in all patients with HCV infection. National Cancer Institute,Common Toxicity Criteria: version 3.0 (NCI-CTC) grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in one case at the end of treatment, but was resolved with cessation of treatment. Other adverse effects were manageable. Conclusion:, Combination therapy with intra-arterial 5-FU and systemic PEG-IFN,-2b may be useful as a palliative treatment for patients with advanced HCC. A prospective controlled trial using a larger population of patients with advanced HCC is needed to evaluate this new combination therapy. [source] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||