Home  About us  Contact
 

Cohabiting Relationships (cohabiting + relationships)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Humanities and Social Sciences60%

Selected Abstracts

Ethnocultural Reproduction and Attitudes towards Cohabiting Relationships,

CANADIAN REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY/REVUE CANADIENNE DE SOCIOLOGIE, Issue 4 2001
Barbara A. Mitchell
Se fondant sur des notions d'interculturalité et de changement social, cet article fournit une explication des différences ethnoculturelles dans les attitudes à l'endroit des relations de cohabitation hétérosexuelle chez les jeunes adultes canadiens. L'accent est mis sur la mise au jour des mécanismes clés par lesquels les groupes ethniques « reproduisent » des orientations teintées de traditionalisme ou de libéralisme à l'endroit de ces conditions de logement. L'ensemble de données utilisé dans cette recherche est tiré d'un sous-ensemble de 1 907 jeunes adultes choisis au hasard dans la Culture and Coresidence Study de 1999,2000. Les analyses à deux variables montrent de fortes différences ethnocuturelles dans la propension à déclarer que la cohabitation est acceptable, les Britanniques étant les plus favorables, suivis des Européens du Sud, des Chinois et enfin des Indo-Canadiens. Les réultats de l'analyse de régression logistique révèlent qu'une constellation de facteurs ethnocul-turels concourent à ces différences, par exemple la religiosité des jeunes adultes, le traditionalisme dans la famille et le rôle assignéà chacun des sexes, ainsi que l'usage quotidien d'une langue ethnique avec son entourage. From a cross-cultural and social change perspective, this paper explicates ethnocultural differences in attitudes towards heterosexual cohabiting relationships among Canadian young adults. The focus is on uncovering the key mechanisms by which ethnic groups "reproduce" traditional or liberal value orientations towards this living arrangement. The data set used in this research is drawn from a sub-set of 1,907 randomly-selected young adults from the 1999,2000 Culture and Coresidence Study. Bivariate analyses show strong ethnocultural differences in the propensity to report that cohabitation is acceptable, with the British group the most favourable, followed by Southern Europeans, Chinese, and finally, Indo-Canadians. Results from the logistic regression analysis reveal that a constellation of ethnocultural factors contribute to these differences. These include: young adult's religiosity, familism and gender-role traditionalism, and routine use of ethnic language with peers. [source]

Communication, Conflict, and Commitment: Insights on the Foundations of Relationship Success from a National Survey

FAMILY PROCESS, Issue 4 2002
Scott M. Stanley Ph.D.
The key relationship dynamics of communication, conflict, and commitment were investigated using data from a randomly sampled, nationwide phone survey of adults in married, engaged, and cohabiting relationships. Findings on communication and conflict generally replicated those of studies using more in depth or objective measurement strategies. Negative interaction between partners was negatively associated with numerous measures of relationship quality and positively correlated with divorce potential (thinking or talking about divorce). Withdrawal during conflict by either or both partners, thought quite common, was associated with more negativity and less positive connection in relationships. The most frequently reported issue that couples argue about in first marriages was money, and in re-marriages it was conflict about children. Overall, how couples argue was more related to divorce potential than was what they argue about, although couples who argue most about money tended to have higher levels of negative communication and conflict than other couples. Further, while the male divorce potential was more strongly linked to levels of negative interaction, the female was more strongly linked to lower positive connection in the relationship. Consistent with the commitment literature, higher reported commitment was associated with less alternative monitoring, less feeling trapped in the relationship, and greater relationship satisfaction. [source]

A comparative, cross-national analysis of partner-killing by women in cohabiting and marital relationships in Australia and the United States

AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, Issue 3 2004
Jenny Mouzos
Abstract Using a national-level United States database, T. K. Shackelford [Partner-killing by women in cohabiting relationships and marital relationships. Homicide Studies 5: 253-266, 2001] calculated rates of partner-killing by women by relationship type (cohabiting or marital), by partner ages, and by the age difference between partners. Men in cohabiting relationships were 10 times more likely to be killed by their partners than were married men. Within marriages, the risk of being killed by a partner decreased with a man's age. Within cohabiting relationships, in contrast, middle-aged men were at greatest risk of being killed by their partners. The risk that a man will be killed by his partner generally increased with greater age difference between partners. We sought to replicate the findings of Shackelford [2001] using national-level data held as part of the National Homicide Monitoring Program (NHMP) at the Australian Institute of Criminology in Australia. The NHMP holds data on over 3,500 homicides that occurred in Australia between 1989 and 2000. Despite the higher rate of partner-killing in the United States, and despite other cultural differences between the two countries (for example, the prominent gun culture in the United States), we replicated the key patterns with the Australian data. Aggr. Behav. 30:206,216, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Cohabitation in Twentieth Century England and Wales: Law and Policy

LAW & POLICY, Issue 1 2004
Rebecca Probert
This article reviews the complex, and sometimes conflicting, policies adopted by the law of England and Wales over the course of the twentieth century. Its aim is to highlight the fact that cohabitation is not merely a modern legal issue, but one with which both the legislature and the courts have had to grapple for decades. It argues that reform has been piecemeal and context-specific because the courts and legislature have not adopted a coherent policy toward cohabiting relationships. [source]

Ethnocultural Reproduction and Attitudes towards Cohabiting Relationships,

CANADIAN REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY/REVUE CANADIENNE DE SOCIOLOGIE, Issue 4 2001
Barbara A. Mitchell
Se fondant sur des notions d'interculturalité et de changement social, cet article fournit une explication des différences ethnoculturelles dans les attitudes à l'endroit des relations de cohabitation hétérosexuelle chez les jeunes adultes canadiens. L'accent est mis sur la mise au jour des mécanismes clés par lesquels les groupes ethniques « reproduisent » des orientations teintées de traditionalisme ou de libéralisme à l'endroit de ces conditions de logement. L'ensemble de données utilisé dans cette recherche est tiré d'un sous-ensemble de 1 907 jeunes adultes choisis au hasard dans la Culture and Coresidence Study de 1999,2000. Les analyses à deux variables montrent de fortes différences ethnocuturelles dans la propension à déclarer que la cohabitation est acceptable, les Britanniques étant les plus favorables, suivis des Européens du Sud, des Chinois et enfin des Indo-Canadiens. Les réultats de l'analyse de régression logistique révèlent qu'une constellation de facteurs ethnocul-turels concourent à ces différences, par exemple la religiosité des jeunes adultes, le traditionalisme dans la famille et le rôle assignéà chacun des sexes, ainsi que l'usage quotidien d'une langue ethnique avec son entourage. From a cross-cultural and social change perspective, this paper explicates ethnocultural differences in attitudes towards heterosexual cohabiting relationships among Canadian young adults. The focus is on uncovering the key mechanisms by which ethnic groups "reproduce" traditional or liberal value orientations towards this living arrangement. The data set used in this research is drawn from a sub-set of 1,907 randomly-selected young adults from the 1999,2000 Culture and Coresidence Study. Bivariate analyses show strong ethnocultural differences in the propensity to report that cohabitation is acceptable, with the British group the most favourable, followed by Southern Europeans, Chinese, and finally, Indo-Canadians. Results from the logistic regression analysis reveal that a constellation of ethnocultural factors contribute to these differences. These include: young adult's religiosity, familism and gender-role traditionalism, and routine use of ethnic language with peers. [source]