Home About us Contact | |||
Cocaine Craving (cocaine + craving)
Selected AbstractsDaily Sessions of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Left Prefrontal Cortex Gradually Reduce Cocaine CravingTHE AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, Issue 4 2008Ernestina Politi MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST): a paradigm for the controlled evaluation of candidate medications for cocaine dependenceADDICTION, Issue 2005Deborah B. Leiderman ABSTRACT Aim Development of effective medications for the treatment of cocaine dependence remains a major priority for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the National Institutes of Health. The Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST) paradigm was developed by the Division of Treatment Research and Development (DT R&D) at NIDA with the goal of enhancing pilot clinical trial validity when systematically assessing a range of medications and drug classes for potential utility in treatment of cocaine dependence. Design CREST utilizes a randomized, controlled, parallel group, blinded methodology for comparing one or more marketed medications against a standard, pharmaceutical grade placebo. The trial design is comprised of a flexible 2,4-week screening/baseline period followed by randomization to an 8-week treatment period. Measures Standard measures of outcomes for the CREST included urinary benzoylecgonine (primary metabolite of cocaine), retention, cocaine craving, depression, clinical global impression and HIV-risk behaviors. In order to facilitate comparisons of data from the CREST studies across sites, drug classes and time, standardized procedures, measures and psychosocial counseling were used. Results A total of 19 medications were evaluated in out-patient treatment research clinics in Boston, Cincinnati, Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia. Conclusions Findings supported decisions to move forward three medications (cabergoline, reserpine, tiagabine) using full-scale, adequately powered, randomized placebo-controlled trial designs. Lessons learned from the CREST experience continue to shape cocaine pharmacotherapy trial design and execution. [source] Efficacy screening trials of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, pramipexole and venlafaxine in cocaine dependenceADDICTION, Issue 2005Domenic A. Ciraulo ABSTRACT Aims The two studies presented here were conducted to assess the efficacy of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, venlafaxine and pramipexole as medications for the treatment of cocaine dependence. Design A multi-arm, modified blinded, placebo-controlled design was used. Setting The studies were conducted at the Boston VA Healthcare System and the Boston University School of Medicine Medication Development Research Unit (MDRU). Participants Participants met criteria for cocaine dependence during a 2-week screening period. Intervention Following random assignment to one of the treatment groups, subjects received active medication or placebo for 8 weeks in combination with cognitive behavioral counseling. In the first study the efficacy of the antidepressant paroxetine (20 mg daily), the phosphodiesterase inhibitor pentoxifylline (1200 mg daily) and the glutamate release inhibitor riluzole (100 mg daily) was assessed. The antidepressant venlafaxine (150 mg daily) and the dopamine agonist pramipexole (1.5 mg daily) were evaluated in the second study. Measurements Urine benzoylecgonine (BE) concentrations, self-report of cocaine use and global impression scores served as primary outcome measures. Secondary measures included assessments of cocaine craving and psychiatric functioning. Adverse events were monitored during the treatment period. Findings None of the active medications produced greater reductions in urine BE concentrations over the treatment period than did placebo. There were trends for BE levels to become reduced in the pentoxifylline group during the first 4 weeks of treatment and for Addiction Severity Index (ASI) drug composite scores to be lower in the pentoxyfylline group at end-point compared to the placebo group. Significant within-group reductions in reported cocaine use and craving were found for all treatment groups, but none of the active medications were superior to placebo on these measures. The accuracy of self-reported cocaine use declined over the study period. Overall, the active medications were well tolerated. Conclusions This study does not support the use of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, venlafaxine or pramipexole for the treatment of cocaine dependence. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution because of the small size and lack of homogeneity of the experimental groups. [source] SAFETY OF DEXTROAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE COMBINATIONS IN COCAINE USERSALCOHOLISM, Issue 2008William Murff Two studies evaluated the safety and abuse liability of d-amphetamine in combination with cocaine in twenty cocaine-using research volunteers maintained in a controlled research laboratory. The first study tested low doses of d-amphetamine (15 mg) administered orally as a 1.5-hr pretreatment before low intranasal doses (48 mg) of cocaine. The study was double-blind, double-dummy, and placebo-controlled. A dose run-up procedure was employed to maximize safety. All drug effects were modest and the main finding of the study was diminished subjective effects of cocaine on a replicate determination of the original cocaine dose. The second study examined higher doses of d-amphetamine (30 mg, p.o.) and cocaine (96 mg, i.n.), alone and in combination, without a gradual dose run-up. Cocaine alone increased subjective mood, cocaine craving, and ratings indicating cocaine abuse potential. Again, replicate administration of cocaine produced lesser subjective effects than the first dose. D-amphetamine alone increased systolic and mean arterial pressures, but produced minimal effects on subjective mood. The combination of d-amphetamine and cocaine never produced effects greater than cocaine alone except for one subject who had an asymptomatic hypertensive episode. The data are interpreted in light of the possible use of stimulants for the treatment of cocaine dependence. [source] Comparison of Olanzapine to Risperidone in Substance-Abusing Individuals with SchizophreniaTHE AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, Issue 4 2007Evaristo Akerele MD A 14-week double blind study compared the efficacy of olanzapine to risperidone in reducing marijuana/cocaine craving and use in individuals with schizophrenia. The study consisted of three phases: a two-week assessment phase, a two-week cross-taper phase onto olanzapine/risperidone, and a ten-week period of maintenance on olanzapine/risperidone. The proportion of cocaine-positive urines decreases over time for both groups with a trend for a greater reduction for the olanzapine group compared to risperidone group. In the last six weeks, marijuana craving was more likely for the risperidone group compared to the olanzapine group, although there was no group difference in the proportion of negative marijuana urines. The data suggest some potential for the utility of olanzapine for the treatment of cocaine dependence in individuals with schizophrenia. [source] |