Home About us Contact | |||
Clock Mechanism (clock + mechanism)
Selected AbstractsCircadian variations of prostaglandin E2 and F2 , release in the golden hamster retinaJOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, Issue 4 2010Nuria De Zavalía J. Neurochem. (2009) 112, 972,979. Abstract Circadian variations of prostaglandin E2 and F2, release were examined in the golden hamster retina. Both parameters showed significant diurnal variations with maximal values at midnight. When hamsters were placed under constant darkness for 48 h, the differences in prostaglandin release between subjective mid-day and subjective midnight persisted. Western blot analysis showed that cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 levels were significantly higher at midnight than at mid-day, and at subjective midnight than at subjective mid-day, whereas no changes in COX-2 levels were observed among these time points. Immunohistochemical studies indicated the presence of COX-1 and COX-2 in the inner (but not outer) retina. Circadian variations of retinal prostaglandin release were also assessed in suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN)-lesioned animals. Significant differences in retinal prostaglandin release between subjective mid-day and subjective midnight were observed in SCN-lesioned animals. These results indicate that hamster retinal prostaglandin release is regulated by a retinal circadian clock independent from the SCN. Thus, the present results suggest that the prostaglandin/COX-1 system could be a retinal clock output or part of the retinal clock mechanism. [source] Developmental Alcohol Exposure Alters Light-Induced Phase Shifts of the Circadian Activity Rhythm in RatsALCOHOLISM, Issue 7 2004Yuhua Z. Farnell Background: Developmental alcohol (EtOH) exposure produces long-term changes in the photic regulation of rat circadian behavior. Because entrainment of circadian rhythms to 24-hr light/dark cycles is mediated by phase shifting or resetting the clock mechanism, we examined whether developmental EtOH exposure also alters the phase-shifting effects of light pulses on the rat activity rhythm. Methods: Artificially reared Sprague-Dawley rat pups were exposed to EtOH (4.5 g/kg/day) or an isocaloric milk formula (gastrostomy control; GC) on postnatal days 4 to 9. At 2 months of age, rats from the EtOH, GC, and suckle control groups were housed individually, and wheel-running behavior was continuously recorded first in a 12-hr light/12-hr dark photoperiod for 10 to 14 days and thereafter in constant darkness (DD). Once the activity rhythm was observed to stably free-run in DD for at least 14 days, animals were exposed to a 15-min light pulse at either 2 or 10 hr after the onset of activity [i.e., circadian time (CT) 14 or 22, respectively], because light exposure at these times induces maximal phase delays or advances of the rat activity rhythm. Results: EtOH-treated rats were distinguished by robust increases in their phase-shifting responses to light. In the suckle control and GC groups, light pulses shifted the activity rhythm as expected, inducing phase delays of approximately 2 hr at CT 14 and advances of similar amplitude at CT 22. In contrast, the same light stimulus produced phase delays at CT 14 and advances at CT 22 of longer than 3 hr in EtOH-treated rats. The mean phase delay at CT 14 and advance at CT 22 in EtOH rats were significantly greater (p < 0.05) than the light-induced shifts observed in control animals. Conclusions: The data indicate that developmental EtOH exposure alters the phase-shifting responses of the rat activity rhythm to light. This finding, coupled with changes in the circadian period and light/dark entrainment observed in EtOH-treated rats, suggests that developmental EtOH exposure may permanently alter the clock mechanism in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and its regulation of circadian behavior. [source] The role of cell-specific circadian clocks in metabolism and diseaseOBESITY REVIEWS, Issue 2009M. S. Bray Summary Biological rhythms are an integral component of essentially all aspects of life. These rhythms are controlled in part by circadian clocks, transcriptionally based mechanisms that synchronize the organism to its changing environment. The central circadian clock is located within the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the brain, while peripheral clocks are located within virtually all cells outside of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Although our understanding of central clock structure and function is well advanced, the role of peripheral clocks in whole body energy metabolism is just beginning to be elucidated. Both central and peripheral circadian clocks likely regulate many physiological functions, including insulin sensitivity, endocrine regulation, energy homeostasis, satiety signalling, cellular proliferation and cardiovascular function. Widely varying phenotypes have been reported following global genetic disruption of the clock mechanism in mice, with phenotype dependent on both the clock component targeted and genetic background. The inconsistency in phenotypes associated with clock disruption may be due, in part, to cell-specific effects of the circadian clocks. To address this question, many laboratories have begun generating animal models of cell type-specific clock disruption. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on tissue-specific models of circadian clock disruption and provide a focus for future research in this area. [source] A Hes1-based oscillator in cultured cells and its potential implications for the segmentation clockBIOESSAYS, Issue 3 2003J. Kim Dale During somitogenesis an oscillatory mechanism termed the "segmentation" clock generates periodic waves of gene expression, which translate into the periodic spatial pattern manifest as somites. The dynamic expression of the clock genes shares the same periodicity as somitogenesis. Notch signaling is believed to play a role in the segmentation clock mechanism. The paper by Hirata et al.(1) identifies a biological clock in cultured cells that is dependent upon the Notch target gene Hes1, and which shows a periodicity similar to that of the segmentation clock. This finding opens the possibility that the same oscillator mechanism might also operate in other tissues or cell types. BioEssays 25:200,203, 2003. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] Rhythmic expression of clock genes in the ependymal cell layer of the third ventricle of rodents is independent of melatonin signalingEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 12 2008Shinobu Yasuo Abstract Reproductive physiology is regulated by the photoperiod in many mammals. Decoding of the photoperiod involves circadian clock mechanisms, although the molecular basis remains unclear. Recent studies have shown that the ependymal cell layer lining the infundibular recess of the third ventricle (EC) is a key structure for the photoperiodic gonadal response. The EC exhibits daylength-dependent changes in the expression of photoperiodic output genes, including the type 2 deiodinase gene (Dio2,). Here we investigated whether clock genes (Per1 and Bmal1) and the albumin D-binding protein gene (Dbp) are expressed in the EC of Syrian hamsters, and whether their expression differs under long-day and short-day conditions. Expression of all three genes followed a diurnal rhythm; expression of Per1 and Dbp in the EC peaked around lights-off, and expression of Bmal1 peaked in the early light phase. The amplitude of Per1 and Dbp expression was higher in hamsters kept under long-day conditions than in those kept under short-day conditions. Notably, the expression of these genes was not modified by exogenous melatonin within 25 h after injection, whereas Dio2 expression was inhibited 19 h after injection. Targeted melatonin receptor (MT1, MT2, and both MT1 and MT2) disruption in melatonin-proficient C3H mice did not affect the rhythmic expression of Per1 in the EC. These data show the existence of a molecular clock in the rodent EC. In the hamster, this clock responds to long-term changes in the photoperiod, but is independent of acute melatonin signals. In mice, the EC clock is not affected by deletion of melatonin receptors. [source] |