Clock Drawing Test (clock + drawing_test)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


USE OF THE AUTOMATIC CLOCK DRAWING TEST TO RAPIDLY SCREEN FOR COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN OLDER ADULTS, DRIVERS, AND THE PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 2 2007
Sandy Helene Straus MS
No abstract is available for this article. [source]


Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtypes and Vascular Dementia in Community-Dwelling Elderly People: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 4 2006
Mariella Zanetti MD
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with multiple impaired cognitive domains (mcd-MCI) is a prodromal manifestation of vascular dementia (VaD). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Geriatric unit of the Ospedale Maggiore Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred community-dwelling subjects aged 65 and older who came freely to the geriatric unit as part of a comprehensive geriatric assessment program were evaluated for memory impairment or other cognitive disorders. Subjects with MCI were kept under observation for 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects with MCI were studied by applying a standardized clinical evaluation and a conducting a computed tomography brain scan. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Clock Drawing Test, and a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests. Cardiovascular comorbidity was assessed on the basis of medical history and using electrocardiography, echocardiography, and carotid color Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: MCI was found in 65 of the 400 community-dwelling subjects; 31 were classified with amnestic MCI (a-MCI) and 34 with mcd-MCI. A dysexecutive syndrome characterized people with mcd-MCI, who had significantly more vascular comorbidity and signs of vascular disease on brain imaging as well as a higher prevalence of extra pyramidal features, mood disorders, and behavioral symptoms than people with a-MCI. Twenty of the 65 subjects with MCI (31%) progressed to dementia within 3 years of follow-up: 11 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and nine with VaD. All patients who evolved to AD had been classified with a-MCI at baseline, whereas all patients who evolved to subcortical VaD had been classified with mcd-MCI at baseline. CONCLUSION: All subjects who converted to subcortical VaD had been classified with mcd-MCI, suggesting that mcd-MCI might be an early stage of subcortical VaD. [source]


Diagnostic Accuracy of a New Instrument for Detecting Cognitive Dysfunction in an Emergent Psychiatric Population: The Brief Cognitive Screen

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 3 2010
Steven P. Cercy PhD
Abstract Objectives:, In certain clinical contexts, the sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is limited. The authors developed a new cognitive screening instrument, the Brief Cognitive Screen (BCS), with the aim of improving diagnostic accuracy for cognitive dysfunction in the psychiatric emergency department (ED) in a quick and convenient format. Methods:, The BCS, consisting of the Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT), animal fluency, the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and the MMSE, was administered to 32 patients presenting with emergent psychiatric conditions. Comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation served as the criterion standard for determining cognitive dysfunction. Diagnostic accuracy of the MMSE was determined using the traditional clinical cutoff and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Diagnostic accuracy of individual BCS components and BCS Summary Scores was determined by ROC analyses. Results:, At the traditional clinical cutoff, MMSE sensitivity (46.4%) and total diagnostic accuracy (53.1%) were inadequate. Under ROC analyses, the diagnostic accuracy of the full BCS Summary Score (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.857) was comparable to the MMSE (AUC = 0.828). However, a reduced BCS Summary Score consisting of OTMT Part B (OTMT,B), animal fluency, and the CDT yielded classification accuracy (AUC = 0.946) that was superior to the MMSE. Conclusions:, Preliminary findings suggest the BCS is an effective, convenient alternative cognitive screening instrument for use in emergent psychiatric populations. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:307,315 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source]


Clock drawing from the occupational therapy adult perceptual screening test: Its correlation with demographic and clinical factors in the stroke population

AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, Issue 3 2010
Deirdre M. Cooke
Background/aim:,The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between clock drawing ability following stroke, and key clinical variables including cognition, functional independence, side and type of stroke, educational level and age. Methods:,One hundred and ninety-seven people with stroke were recruited from 12 hospital and rehabilitation facilities. The participants' scores from the Clock Drawing Test in the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test were the dependent variables and were entered into logistic regression with Functional Independence Measure motor scores, side of stroke, Oxfordshire Classification System of Stroke, educational level and age as independent variables. Correlation with the Mini-Mental State Examination was analysed independently, due to its strong correlation with other variables. Results:,The Mini-Mental State Examination correlated significantly with the Clock Drawing Test ( Exp (B) = 0.826, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a significant relationship was found with age (Exp ( B) = 1.052, P < 0.001), Functional Independence Measure , motor (Exp (B) = 0.984, P = 0.030) and side of stroke (Exp (B) = 0.384, P = 0.003). Age demonstrated the strongest correlation with the Clock Drawing Test ability and the greatest decline was from approximately 70 years of age. Conclusions:,The Clock Drawing Test may be a useful and quick screen of cognitive impairments following stroke. Age-related decline must be considered and it is essential that clinicians use this only as a strategy to determine whether a more comprehensive assessment is required. [source]


Comparing clock tests for dementia screening: naïve judgments vs formal systems,what is optimal?

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, Issue 1 2002
James M. Scanlan
Abstract Background Clock drawing tests (CDTs) vary in format, scoring, and complexity. Herein, we compared the dementia screening performance of seven CDT scoring systems and the judgements of untrained raters. Methods 80 clock drawings by subjects of known dementia status were selected, 20 from each of four categories (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease [CERAD] defined normal, mild, moderate, and severe abnormality). An expert rater scored all clocks using published criteria for seven systems. Additionally, 20 naïve raters judged clocks as either normal or abnormal, without formal instructions. Clocks were then classified by drawers' dementia status for comparison of dementia detection across systems. Results Naïve and formal CDT systems showed 90,100% agreement in CERAD normal, moderate and severe categories, but poor agreement (mean,=,39%) for mildly impaired clocks. When CDT systems were compared for accurate dementia classification, the Mendez and CERAD systems correctly identified the greatest proportion of subjects (84,85%), and Wolf-Klein the smallest (58%). The better systems correctly identified>,70% of mildly demented individuals (CDR,=,1). In contrast, medical records from patients' personal physicians correctly identified only 24% of the mildly demented. Strikingly, naïve raters' CDT judgements were as effective as five of the seven CDT systems in dementia identification. Conclusions While the Mendez system was the most accurate overall, it was not significantly better than CERAD, which had simpler scoring rules. Untrained raters discriminated normal from abnormal clocks with acceptable accuracy for community screening purposes. Results suggest that, if used, most CDT systems would improve personal physicians' dementia recognition in difficult to detect mildly demented subjects. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]


Inter and intra-rater reliability of clock drawing test in school children

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 7 2004
H. J. Koch
No abstract is available for this article. [source]


The clock drawing test in primary care: sensitivity in dementia detection and specificity against normal and depressed elderly

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, Issue 10 2001
Michael Kirby
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the sensitivities and specificities of the clock drawing test (CDT) in the detection of dementia among older people in primary care, with particular emphasis on the effect of depression on CDT specificity. Most previous studies have been sited in specialist settings and few have addressed the issue of specificity aginst depression. Methods Comparison of cohorts identified from community-based screening with GMS-AGECAT. The CDT and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were administered to 41 elderly subjects with organic disorder (dementia), 84 elderly subjects with case level depression and 523 normal elderly subjects. Sensitivities and specificities of the CDT were calculated. Results The sensitivity of the CDT in the detection of dementia in the general community was 76%. The specificities of the CDT against normal elderly and depressed elderly was 81% and 77% respectively. Higher sensitivity and specificity were achieved by the MMSE. Conclusions The use of the CDT in the detection of dementia syndromes is likely to be more relevant in the primary care context than in specialist settings. The CDT provides good sensitivity and specificity but may not be as sensitive or specific in the general community as previous studies have suggested, particularly in mild dementia. Community-based late life depression does not appear to alter the specificity of the CDT. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]