Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Clinical Drug Development (clinical + drug_development)
Selected AbstractsFundamentals of Early Clinical Drug Development: From Synthesis Design to Formulation.CHEMMEDCHEM, Issue 4 2007Edited by A. No abstract is available for this article. [source] Approaches to measuring the effects of wake-promoting drugs: a focus on cognitive functionHUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, Issue 5 2009Christopher J. Edgar Abstract Objectives In clinical drug development, wakefulness and wake-promotion may be assessed by a large number of scales and questionnaires. Objective assessment of wakefulness is most commonly made using sleep latency/maintenance of wakefulness tests, polysomnography and/or behavioral measures. The purpose of the present review is to highlight the degree of overlap in the assessment of wakefulness and cognition, with consideration of assessment techniques and the underlying neurobiology of both concepts. Design Reviews of four key areas were conducted: commonly used techniques in the assessment of wakefulness; neurobiology of sleep/wake and cognition; targets of wake promoting and/or cognition enhancing drugs; and ongoing clinical trials investigating wake promoting effects. Results There is clear overlap between the assessment of wakefulness and cognition. There are common techniques which may be used to assess both concepts; aspects of the neurobiology of both concepts may be closely related; and wake-promoting drugs may have nootropic properties (and vice versa). Clinical trials of wake-promoting drugs often, though not routinely, assess aspects of cognition. Conclusions Routine and broad assessment of cognition in the development of wake-promoting drugs may reveal important nootropic effects, which are not secondary to alertness/wakefulness, whilst existing cognitive enhancers may have underexplored or unknown wake promoting properties. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in drug product developmentJOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, Issue 1 2002Bernd Meibohm Abstract In the quest of ways for rationalizing and accelerating drug product development, integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) concepts provide a highly promising tool. PK/PD modeling concepts can be applied in all stages of preclinical and clinical drug development, and their benefits are multifold. At the preclinical stage, potential applications might comprise the evaluation of in vivo potency and intrinsic activity, the identification of bio-/surrogate markers, as well as dosage form and regimen selection and optimization. At the clinical stage, analytical PK/PD applications include characterization of the dose,concentration,effect/toxicity relationship, evaluation of food, age and gender effects, drug/drug and drug/disease interactions, tolerance development, and inter- and intraindividual variability in response. Predictive PK/PD applications can also involve extrapolation from preclinical data, simulation of drug responses, as well as clinical trial forecasting. Rigorous implementation of the PK/PD concepts in drug product development provides a rationale, scientifically based framework for efficient decision making regarding the selection of potential drug candidates, for maximum information gain from the performed experiments and studies, and for conducting fewer, more focused clinical trials with improved efficiency and cost effectiveness. Thus, PK/PD concepts are believed to play a pivotal role in streamlining the drug development process of the future. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association J Pharm Sci 91:18,31, 2002 [source] A brief review of Phase 1 and Clinical Pharmacology statistics in clinical drug developmentPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS: THE JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, Issue 2 2007Scott D. Patterson Abstract Following a brief description of historical Phase 1 research, Clinical Pharmacology studies, and the role of statistics in this setting, Phase 1 study design and statistical analysis are reviewed. A description of design and analysis for Clinical Pharmacology studies is also provided, and the role of statistics in this area of drug development in the future is discussed. While challenging, this area of statistics in drug development is likely to have an active and engaging future. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Redefining Affective Disorders: Relevance for Drug DevelopmentCNS: NEUROSCIENCE AND THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2008Steven D Targum The evaluation of new drug entities with specific modes of action may be hampered by rigid diagnostic classification systems and patient selection processes that do not focus on the anticipated symptomatic, behavioral, and functional outcomes to be achieved. Patients enrolled in central nervous system (CNS) clinical trials may present with a heterogeneous group of symptoms representing several syndromes or subtypes, subsumed under the same diagnosis in the DSM-IV classification system. As a result, enrolled patients may not have the valid illness characteristics of interest to the particular study. We propose that clinical drug development needs to focus on the primary nosological entity likely to be affected by a new drug entity's mode of action. Ideally, a valid patient will have the acute primary symptoms that the novel drug is supposed to influence. In this article, we propose operational criteria to delineate a more symptom-specific and ecologically valid approach to the identification of the valid patient for clinical trials. [source] | ||||||||||