Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Circumferential Mapping Catheter (circumferential + mapping_catheter)
Selected AbstractsCryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation Guided by Transesophageal Echocardiography: Novel Aspects on an Emerging Ablation TechniqueJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2009CLAUDIA HERRERA SIKLÓDY M.D. Background: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using a balloon-mounted cryoablation system is a new technology for the percutaneous treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) allows real-time visualization of cryoballoon positioning and successful vein occlusion via color Doppler. We hypothesized that PV mechanical occlusion monitored with TEE could predict effective electrical isolation. Methods: We studied 124 PVs in 30 patients. Under continuous TEE assessment, a cryoballoon was placed in the antrum of each PV aiming for complete PV occlusion as documented by color Doppler. At the end of the procedure, PV electrical isolation was evaluated using a circumferential mapping catheter. Results: Of the 124 PVs studied, 123 (99.2%) could be visualized by TEE: the antrum was completely visualized in 80 of them (64.5%), partially in 36 (29.0%), and only disappearance of proximal flow could be observed in the remaining 7 PVs (5.7%). Vein occlusion could be achieved in 111 of the 123 (90.2%) visualized PVs. Postinterventional mapping demonstrated electrical isolation in 109 of 111 occluded PVs (positive predictive value 98.2%) and only in 1 of 12 nonoccluded PVs (negative predictive value 91.7%, P < 0.001). After a mean follow-up of 7.4 ± 3.7 months, 73.3% of patients remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs. Conclusion: Color Doppler documented PV occlusion during cryoballoon ablation can predict effective electrical isolation. [source] Pulmonary Vein Disconnection Using the LocaLisa Three-Dimensional Nonfluoroscopic Catheter Imaging SystemJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2003Laurent Macle M.D. Introduction: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with prolonged fluoroscopy times. We prospectively evaluated the use of the LocaLisa three-dimensional nonfluoroscopic catheter imaging system with the aim of reducing fluoroscopy times during pulmonary vein (PV) disconnection. Methods and Results: Fifty-two patients with AF (47 men and 5 women, mean age 53 ± 9 years) underwent disconnection of all four PVs guided by a circumferential mapping catheter. The LocaLisa navigation system was used for real-time three-dimensional nonfluoroscopic imaging of the circumferential mapping catheter and ablation catheter electrodes in 26 patients. Procedural parameters were compared with those of a control group consisting of 26 patients in whom only standard fluoroscopy was used. PV disconnection was performed similarly in both groups by circumferential ablation around the ostia, with the endpoint of disconnecting left atrium to PV breakthroughs. The cumulative duration of radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery, procedural time, and fluoroscopy time required for PV disconnection were compared. Successful disconnection was achieved in all PVs, without acute complications. There was no significant difference in cumulative RF energy delivery: 34.8 ± 11.4 minutes for the nonfluoroscopic imaging group versus 38.2 ± 10.5 minutes for the control group. The fluoroscopy time required for disconnection of all four PVs was significantly lower in the LocaLisa group than in the control group: 8.4 ± 4.3 minutes versus 23.7 ± 9.7 minutes (P < 0.0001). There also was a significant difference in the mean time taken for PV disconnection: 46.5 ± 12.0 minutes for the nonfluoroscopic imaging group versus 66.3 ± 18.9 minutes for the control group (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: By allowing continuous three-dimensional monitoring of ablation and mapping catheter position and orientation, the LocaLisa nonfluoroscopic imaging system significantly reduces fluoroscopy and PV disconnection times. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 693,697, July 2003) [source] Irrigated-Tip Catheter Ablation of Pulmonary Veins for Treatment of Atrial FibrillationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2002LAURENT MACLE M.D. Irrigated-Tip Catheter Ablation of PVs.Introduction: Catheter ablation of pulmonary veins (PV) for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited by the disparate requirements of sufficient energy delivery to achieve PV isolation while avoiding PV stenosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using an irrigated-tip catheter for systematic isolation of PV. Methods and Results: The study population consisted of 136 consecutive patients (109 men, mean age 52 ± 10 years) with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal (122) or persistent (14) AF. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation and systematic radiofrequency isolation of all four PVs (guided by a circumferential mapping catheter) was performed in all patients with a protocol using an irrigated-tip catheter. PV diameter was assessed by selective angiography. The electrophysiologic endpoint of PV isolation was achieved in 100% of patients. Bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block was achieved in 99% of patients. Moderate PV stenosis (50% narrowing) was observed in one patient (0.7%) without clinical consequence. No other complications were observed. Reablation procedures were required in 67 patients (49%). After a mean follow-up of 8.8 ± 5.3 months, 81% of patients were free of AF clinical recurrence, including 66% not taking any antiarrhythmic drugs. Conclusion: Systematic radiofrequency ablation of PV using an irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation allows complete isolation of all four PVs with a very low incidence of stenosis. [source] Segmental Pulmonary Vein Ablation: Success Rates with and without Exclusion of Areas Adjacent to the EsophagusPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2008KLAUS KETTERING M.D. Background: Catheter ablation has become the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic recurrent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). The occurrence of an atrioesophageal fistula is a rare but serious complication after AF-ablation procedures. This risk is even present during segmental pulmonary vein (PV) ablation procedures because the esophagus does frequently have a very close anatomical relationship to the right or left PV ostia. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether the exclusion of areas adjacent to the esophagus does have a significant effect on the success rates after segmental pulmonary vein ablation procedures. Methods: Forty-three consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were enrolled in this study. In all patients, a segmental PV ablation procedure was performed. The procedures were facilitated by a 3D real-time visualization of the circumferential mapping catheter placed in the pulmonary veins using the NavXÔ system (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA; open irrigated tip ablation catheter; 43°C; 30 W). In 21 patients, a complete ostial PV isolation was attempted regardless of the anatomical relationship between the ablation sites and the esophagus (group A). In the remaining 22 patients, the esophagus was marked by a stomach tube and areas adjacent to the esophagus were excluded from the ablation procedure (group B). After discharge, patients were scheduled for repeated visits at the arrhythmia clinic at 1, 3, and 6 months after the ablation procedure. Results: The segmental pulmonary vein ablation procedure could be performed as planned in all patients. In group A, all pulmonary veins could be isolated successfully in 14 out of 21 patients (67%). A mean number of 3.7 pulmonary veins (SD ± 0.5 PVs) were isolated per patient. The main reasons for an incomplete PV isolation were: small diameter of the PVs, side branches close to the ostium, or poorly accessible PV ostia. In group B, all PVs could be isolated successfully in only 12 out of 22 patients (55%; P = 0.54). A mean number of 3.2 PVs (SD ± 0.9 PVs) were isolated per patient (P = 0.05). This was mostly due to a close anatomical relationship to the esophagus. The ablation strategy had to be modified in 16/22 patients in group B because of a close anatomical relationship between the left (n = 10) or right (n = 6) PV ostia and the esophagus. After 3 months, the percentage of patients free from an AF recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (90% vs 95%; P = 0.61). After 6 months, there was no significant difference between the success rates either (81% vs 82%; P = 1.0). There were no major complications in both groups. Conclusions: The exclusion of areas adjacent to the esophagus results in a moderately higher percentage of incompletely isolated PVs. However, it does not have a significant effect on the AF recurrence rate during short-term and mid-term follow-up. [source] | ||||||||||