Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Circadian Oscillations (circadian + oscillation)
Selected AbstractsCircadian rhythm of aromatic l -amino acid decarboxylase in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: gene expression and decarboxylating activity in clock oscillating cellsGENES TO CELLS, Issue 5 2002Yoshiki Ishida Background: Aromatic l -amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) is the enzyme responsible for the decarboxylation step in both the catecholamine and indoleamine synthetic pathways. In the brain, however, a group of AADC containing neurones is found outside the classical monoaminergic cell groups. Since such non-monoaminergic AADC is expressed abundantly in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the mammalian circadian centre, we characterized the role of AADC in circadian oscillation. Results : AADC gene expression was observed in neurones of the dorsomedial subdivision of the SCN and its dorsal continuant in the anterior hypothalamic area. These AADC neurones could uptake exogenously applied L-DOPA and formed dopamine. AADC was co-expressed with vasopressin and the clock gene Per1 in the neurones of the SCN. Circadian gene expression of AADC was observed with a peak at subjective day and a trough at subjective night. The circadian rhythm of AADC enzyme activity in the SCN reflects the expression of the gene. Conclusions: Non-monoaminergic AADC in the SCN is expressed in clock oscillating cells, and the decarboxylating activity of master clock cells are under the control of the circadian rhythm. [source] Neurobiology of the fruit fly's circadian clockGENES, BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, Issue 2 2005C. Helfrich-Förster Studying the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has revealed mechanisms underlying circadian clock function. Rhythmic behavior could be assessed to the function of several clock genes that generate circadian oscillations in certain brain neurons, which finally modulate behavior in a circadian manner. This review outlines how individual circadian pacemaker neurons in the fruit fly's brain control rhythm in locomotor activity and eclosion. [source] Morphine withdrawal produces circadian rhythm alterations of clock genes in mesolimbic brain areas and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in ratsJOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, Issue 6 2009Su-xia Li Abstract Previous studies have shown that clock genes are expressed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, other brain regions, and peripheral tissues. Various peripheral oscillators can run independently of the SCN. However, no published studies have reported changes in the expression of clock genes in the rat central nervous system and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after withdrawal from chronic morphine treatment. Rats were administered with morphine twice daily at progressively increasing doses for 7 days; spontaneous withdrawal signs were recorded 14 h after the last morphine administration. Then, brain and blood samples were collected at each of eight time points (every 3 h: ZT 9; ZT 12; ZT 15; ZT 18; ZT 21; ZT 0; ZT 3; ZT 6) to examine expression of rPER1 and rPER2 and rCLOCK. Rats presented obvious morphine withdrawal signs, such as teeth chattering, shaking, exploring, ptosis, and weight loss. In morphine-treated rats, rPER1 and rPER2 expression in the SCN, basolateral amygdala, and nucleus accumbens shell showed robust circadian rhythms that were essentially identical to those in control rats. However, robust circadian rhythm in rPER1 expression in the ventral tegmental area was completely phase-reversed in morphine-treated rats. A blunting of circadian oscillations of rPER1 expression occurred in the central amygdala, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens core, and PBMCs and rPER2 expression occurred in the central amygdala, prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens core, and PBMCs in morphine-treated rats compared with controls. rCLOCK expression in morphine-treated rats showed no rhythmic change, identical to control rats. These findings indicate that withdrawal from chronic morphine treatment resulted in desynchronization from the SCN rhythm, with blunting of rPER1 and rPER2 expression in reward-related neurocircuits and PBMCs. [source] Electrodermal activity during total sleep deprivation and its relationship with other activation and performance measuresJOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, Issue 2 2002E. Miró The present study analyses the variations of the skin resistance level (SRL) during 48 h of total sleep deprivation (TSD) and its relationship to body temperature, self-informed sleepiness in the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS), and reaction time (RT). All of the variables were evaluated every 2 h except for the SSS, which was evaluated every hour. A total of 30 healthy subjects (15 men and 15 women) from 18 to 24 years old participated in the experiment. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with TSD days and time-of-day as factors showed a substantial increase of SRL, SSS, and RT, and a decrease in body temperature marked by strong circadian oscillations. The interaction between day by time-of-day was only significant for RT. Furthermore, Pearson's correlations showed that the increase of SRL is associated to the decrease in temperature (mean r=,0.511), the increase of SSS (mean r=0.509), and the deterioration of RT (mean r=0.425). The results support previous TSD reports and demonstrate the sensitivity of SRL to TSD. The non-invasive character of SRL, its simplicity, and its relationships with other activation parameters, widely validated by previous literature, convert SRL into an interesting and useful measure in this field. [source] Immunocytochemical analysis of the circadian clock protein in mouse hepatocytesMICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, Issue 5 2003Manuela Malatesta Abstract Many biochemical, physiological, and behavioral processes in organisms ranging from prokaryotes to humans exhibit circadian rhythms, defined as cyclic oscillations of about 24 hours. The mechanism of the cellular circadian clock relies on interlocking positive and negative transcriptional/translational feedback loops based on the regulated expression of several genes. Clock is one of these genes and its transcript, CLOCK protein, is a transcription factor belonging to the bHLH-PAS family. In mammals the clock gene is expressed in several tissues, including the liver. In the present study, we analyzed by means of quali-quantitative immunoelectron microscopy the fine intracellular distribution of the CLOCK protein in mouse hepatocytes during the daily cycle. We demonstrated that CLOCK protein is mostly located in the cell nucleus, where it accumulates on perichromatin fibrils, representing the in situ form of nascent pre-mRNA, while condensed chromatin and nucleoli contain lower amounts of protein. Moreover, we found that CLOCK protein shows circadian oscillations in these nuclear compartments, peaking in late afternoon. At this time the hepatic transcriptional rate reaches the maximal level, thus suggesting an important role of CLOCK protein in the regulation of liver gene expression. Microsc. Res. Tech. 61:414,418, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Crayfish Procambarus clarkii Retina and Nervous System Exhibit Antioxidant Circadian Rhythms Coupled with Metabolic and Luminous Daily CyclesPHOTOCHEMISTRY & PHOTOBIOLOGY, Issue 1 2009María Luisa Fanjul-Moles Based on previous work in which we proposed midgut as a putative peripheral oscillator responsible for circadian reduced glutathione (GSH) crayfish status, herein we investigated the retina and optic lobe-brain (OL-B) circadian GSH system and its ability to deal with reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced as a consequence of metabolic rhythms and light variations. We characterized daily and antioxidant circadian variations of the different parameters of the glutathione system, including GSH, oxidized glutathione (GSSG), glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), as well as metabolic and lipoperoxidative circadian oscillations in retina and OL-B, determining internal and external GSH-system synchrony. The results demonstrate statistically significant bi- and unimodal daily and circadian rhythms in all GSH-cycle parameters, substrates and enzymes in OL-B and retina, as well as an apparent direct effect of light on these rhythms, especially in the retina. The luminous condition appears to stimulate the GSH system to antagonize ROS and lipid peroxidation (LPO) daily and circadian rhythms occurring in both structures, oscillating with higher LPO under dark conditions. We suggest that the difference in the effect of light on GSH rhythmic mechanisms of both structures for antagonizing ROS could be due to differences in glutathione-system coupling strength with the circadian clock. [source] The ups and downs of daily life: Profiling circadian gene expression in DrosophilaBIOESSAYS, Issue 6 2002Paul D. Etter Circadian rhythms are responsible for 24-hour oscillations in diverse biological processes. While the central genes governing circadian pacemaker rhythmicity have largely been identified, clock-controlled output molecules responsible for regulating rhythmic behaviors remain largely unknown. Two recent reports from McDonald and Rosbash1 and Claridge-Chang et al.2 address this issue. By identifying a large number of genes whose mRNA levels show circadian oscillations, the reports provide important new information on the biology of circadian rhythm. In addition, the reports illustrate both the power and limitations of microarray-based methods for profiling mRNA expression on a genomic scale. BioEssays 24:494,498, 2002. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||