			Home About us Contact

CI Users (ci + user)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	75%

Selected Abstracts

Source localization of auditory evoked potentials after cochlear implantation

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2008
Stefan Debener
Abstract Little is known about how the auditory cortex adapts to artificial input as provided by a cochlear implant (CI). We report the case of a 71-year-old profoundly deaf man, who has successfully used a unilateral CI for 4 years. Independent component analysis (ICA) of 61-channel EEG recordings could separate CI-related artifacts from auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs), even though it was the perfectly time-locked CI stimulation that caused the AEPs. AEP dipole source localization revealed contralaterally larger amplitudes in the P1,N1 range, similar to normal hearing individuals. In contrast to normal hearing individuals, the man with the CI showed a 20-ms shorter N1 latency ipsilaterally. We conclude that ICA allows the detailed study of AEPs in CI users. [source]

Worldwide trends in bilateral cochlear implantation,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue S2 2010
B. Robert Peters MD
Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: The goal of this study is to ascertain worldwide experience with bilateral cochlear implantation (BCI) with regard to patient demographics, trends in provision of BCI to adult and child patient populations, differences and similarities in BCI candidacy criteria, diagnostic requirements, and treatment approaches among clinicians in high-volume cochlear implant centers. Study Design: Retrospective/prospective. Methods: An electronic survey consisting of 59 mainly multiple-choice questions was developed for online completion. It examined the implant experience and clinical opinion of expert cochlear implant (CI) centers worldwide on the indications, motivations, and contraindications for adult and pediatric, simultaneous and sequential BCI candidacy. Centers were chosen to complete the survey based on their known reputation as a center of excellence. Patient demographics were queried for two time periods to elucidate trends: 2006 and prior, and for the year 2007. Results: Seventy-one percent (25/35) of the CI clinics approached completed the survey. Collectively, these 25 clinics represent experience with approximately 23,200 CI users globally, representing 15% of the total estimated CI population worldwide. The total number of BCI surgeries reflected in their experience (2,880) represents 36% of the estimated number worldwide as of December 2007. Cumulatively to the end of 2007, 70% of all BCI surgeries have occurred in children, with the 3- to 10-year-old age group having the highest representation (33% of all BCIs), followed in order by adults (30%), children under 3 years of age (26%), and children between 11 and 18 years of age (11%). Seventy-two percent of all BCI surgeries were performed sequentially (70% of children, 76% of adults). Children <3 years of age represent the only age group of all patients in which simultaneous surgeries predominate (58% simultaneous). For all other age groups, sequential surgeries far outnumber simultaneous (3,10 years, 84% sequential; 11,18 years, 94% sequential; adults, 76% sequential). Prior to January 2007, 68% of BCIs were performed in children. This increased to 79% for the year 2007 (P < .001). With regard to children only, a change is apparent over time in terms of the age group making up the majority of pediatric BCI surgeries performed. Prior to 2007, children 3 to 10 years of age made up 50% of the children undergoing BCI, whereas those <3 years made up only 33%. In 2007 this shifted more toward the younger age group (47% for those <3 years and 40% for 3,10-year-olds; P < .001). United States clinics had a higher proportion of adult BCI patients (59% children, 41% adults) than the non-United States clinics (78% children, 22% adults; P < .001). The majority of responders do not hold to a minimum or maximum age by which they limit BCI. Conclusions: Worldwide experience with BCI is now quite extensive and provides a useful base for evaluating clinical outcomes across patient categories and for providing further support during the patient/parent counseling process. Laryngoscope, 120:S17,S44, 2010 [source]

Audiological Application Criteria for Implantable Hearing Aid Devices: A Clinical Experience at the Nijmegen ORL Clinic,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 9 2008
Veronique J. O. Verhaegen MD
Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: To define audiological application criteria for different implantable hearing aid devices. Study Design: Retrospective study. Methods: Comparisons were made between aided speech recognition scores obtained at conversational level (65 dB) in patients with the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) (n = 22), the Otologics middle ear transducer (MET) (n = 10), conventional hearing aids (behind-the-ears) (n = 47), and cochlear implants (CIs) (n = 123). Results: In relation to hearing loss, only for mild hearing loss, speech recognition scores with VSB were comparable to that with conventional hearing aids. In the Otologics MET users, speech recognition scores were comparable with those of the conventional hearing aid users until a mean hearing loss of about 75 dB HL. At a sensorineural hearing loss of about 65 dB HL or more, the Otologics MET users have better speech recognition scores than the VSB users. For comparison with CI users, we followed a more conservative approach. In 90% of the users of a CI, speech recognition scores were better than those in: 1) patients with a conventional hearing aid and a mean hearing loss of about 95 dB HL or worse; 2) patients with an Otologics MET and a mean hearing loss of 85 dB HL or worse. Conclusions: Patients fitted with a VSB or an Otologics MET middle ear implant do not demonstrate better speech recognition scores than patients fitted with today's conventional hearing aids. Results might even been worse. However, the VSB and Otologics MET are a good option in patients with moderate (VSB) to severe (Otologics MET) sensorineural hearing loss and external otitis. [source]

Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 6 2003
D.K.K. Au
Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong High, moderate and low stimulation rates of 1800, 800 and 400 pulse per second (pps)/channel, respectively, were used to test the effects of stimulation rates on the discrimination and identification of Cantonese lexical tones in 11 Chinese post-lingually deafened adults with cochlear implants (CIs). The subjects were implanted with the MED-EL Combi 40+ CI system. They were randomly assigned to each of the stimulation rate conditions according to an ABC design. In both the Cantonese lexical tone perception tests, the subjects reached the highest scores in the high-stimulation-rate condition, and the lowest scores in the low-stimulation-rate condition (P < 0.01). Post hoc comparisons between different stimulation rates did not yield consistent results. This study demonstrated that the maximum stimulation rate of 1800 pps/channel could be an ,optimal' stimulation rate and an informed choice of parameter for the benefit of Cantonese-speaking CI users in lexical tone perception. [source]