Character Transformations (character + transformation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Phylogenetic trends in the abundance and distribution of pit organs of elasmobranchs

ACTA ZOOLOGICA, Issue 4 2004
M. B. Peach
Abstract Pit organs (free neuromasts of the mechanosensory lateral line system) are distributed over the skin of elasmobranchs. To investigate phylogenetic trends in the distribution and abundance of pit organs, 12 relevant morphological characters were added to an existing matrix of morphological data (plus two additional end terminals), which was then re-analysed using cladistic parsimony methods (paup* 4.0b10). Character transformations were traced onto the most parsimonious phylogenetic trees. The results suggest the following interpretations. First, the distinctive overlapping denticles covering the pit organs in many sharks are a derived feature; plesiomorphic elasmobranchs have pit organs in open slits, with widely spaced accessory denticles. Second, the number of pit organs on the ventral surface of rays has been reduced during evolution, and third, spiracular pit organs have changed position or have been lost on several occasions in elasmobranch evolution. The concentrated-changes test in macclade (version 4.05) was used to investigate the association between a pelagic lifestyle and loss of spiracular pit organs (the only character transformation that occurred more than once within pelagic taxa). Depending on the choice of tree, the association was either nonsignificant at P = 0.06 or significant at P < 0.05. Future studies, using species within more restricted elasmobranch clades, are needed to resolve this issue. [source]


Phylogeny of Dicranophoridae (Rotifera: Monogononta) , a maximum parsimony analysis based on morphological characters

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH, Issue 1 2009
O. Riemann
Abstract This study presents the first phylogenetic analysis of Dicranophoridae (Rotifera: Monogononta), a species rich rotifer family of about 230 species currently recognized. It is based on a maximum parsimony analysis including 77 selected ingroup and three outgroup taxa and a total of 59 phylogenetically informative morphological characters. Character coding is based on personal investigation of material collected by the authors and an extensive survey of the literature. Apart from covering general body organization, character coding primarily relies on scanning electron microscopic preparations of the mastax jaw elements. Our study suggests monophyly of Dicranophoridae with a clade of Dicranophorus and Dorria as the sister taxon of all other dicranophorid species. Monophyly of Encentrum, the most species rich genus within Dicranophoridae, cannot be demonstrated. Within Dicranophoridae our study identifies the monophyletic taxa Caudosubbasifenestrata, Intramalleata, Praeuncinata and Proventriculata, each based on unambiguous character transformations evolved in their stem lineages. However, resolution within Praeuncinata and Proventriculata is very limited. Although some terminal clades within Praeuncinata and Proventriculata are recognized, basal splits remain obscure. Probably, other characters such as DNA sequence data are needed to further our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within these poorly resolved taxa. Zusammenfassung Die hier vorgelegte Studie stellt die erste phylogenetische Analyse des Taxons Dicranophoridae (Rotifera: Monogononta) dar, einer artenreichen Familie der Rotiferen mit zurzeit etwa 230 validen Arten. Die resultierenden phylogenetischen Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen fußen auf einer Maximum Parsimonie Analyse mit 77 ausgewählten Vertretern der Innen, und 3 Vertretern der Außengruppe bei insgesamt 59 Parsimonie,informativen Merkmalen. Die Kodierung der Merkmale basiert einerseits auf Material, das von den Autoren selbst gesammelt und bestimmt wurde und andererseits auf einem ausgedehnten Studium der relevanten Literatur. Neben der Erfassung von Merkmalen zur allgemeinen Körperorganisation stützt sich die Merkmalskodierung vor allem auf rasterelektronenmikroskopische Präparationen der Hartelemente des Mastax. Das Ergebnis der Analyse stützt die Monophylie der Dicranophoridae. Innerhalb der Dicranophoridae stellt ein monophyletisches Taxon, das die Gattungen Dicranophorus und Dorria umfasst, die Schwestergruppe aller übrigen Dicranophoridae dar. Die bei weitem artenreichste Gattung Encentrum lässt sich nicht als Monophylum begründen. Als monophyletische Teilgruppen innerhalb der Dicranophoridae identifiziert unsere Analyse die Taxa Caudosubbasifenestrata, Intramalleata, Praeuncinata und Proventriculata, die jeweils durch mindestens eine unzweideutige Merkmalstransformation in ihren Stammlinien begründet werden. Innerhalb der Taxa Praeuncinata und Proventriculata bietet unsere Analyse nur sehr begrenzte Auflösung. Obgleich sich einzelne Teilgruppen über unzweideutige Merkmalstransformationen als Monophyla begründen lassen, fehlen Merkmale für die Auflösung der basalen Verzweigungen innerhalb der Praeuncinata und Proventriculata. Es ist zu erwarten, dass andere Merkmalssysteme, wie zum Beispiel DNA Sequenzdaten, bei der Aufklärung der Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen innerhalb dieser Teilgruppen Klärung erbringen. [source]


Phylogenetic Relationships of the Suborders of Coleoptera (Insecta)

CLADISTICS, Issue 1 2000
Rolf G. Beutel
One hundred seven external and internal characters of larval and adult representatives of 28 genera of the coleopteran suborders were analyzed cladistically. Four groups of Neuropterida were introduced as outgroup. The analysis yielded 18 trees with a minimum of 194 steps (CI 0.691). All trees support the monophyly of all four suborders and a branching pattern (Archostemata + (Adephaga + (Myxophaga + Polyphaga))). The presence of elytra with meso- and metathoracic locking devices, the specific hind-wing folding, the close connection of exposed sclerites, the absence of the mera, the absence of eight thoracic muscles, the reduced abdominal sternite I, and the invagination of terminal segments are autapomorphies of Coleoptera. The monophyly of Coleoptera excl. Archostemata is supported by further transformations of the thoracic sclerites such as absence of the mesothoracic discriminal line and katepisternal joint, by an internalized or absent metathoracic trochantin, by the presence of a bending zone in the hind-wing, and by eight further muscle losses. Fusion of tibia and tarsus and presence of a single claw are larval synapomorphies of Myxophaga and Polyphaga. Adults are characterized by fusion of protrochantin and propleura and by the rigid connection of the meso- and metathoracic ventrites. The eucinetoid lineage of Polyphaga is characterized by the secondary absence of the bending zone of the alae. This results in a distinctly simplified wing folding mechanism. The monophyly of Cucujiformia (+ Bostrichoidea) is supported by the presence of cryptonephric Malpighian tubules. Transformations of fore-and hind-wings, reinforcement and simplification of the thoracic exoskeleton, and an efficient use of a distinctly reduced set of thoracic muscles play an important role in the early evolution of Coleoptera. Many different larval character transformations take place in the earlier Mesozoic within the suborders. [source]