Home About us Contact | |||
Acute Abdominal Pain (acute + abdominal_pain)
Selected AbstractsGender Disparity in Analgesic Treatment of Emergency Department Patients with Acute Abdominal PainACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 5 2008Esther H. Chen MD Abstract Objectives:, Oligoanalgesia for acute abdominal pain historically has been attributed to the provider's fear of masking serious underlying pathology. The authors assessed whether a gender disparity exists in the administration of analgesia for acute abdominal pain. Methods:, This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive nonpregnant adults with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain of less than 72 hours' duration who presented to an urban emergency department (ED) from April 5, 2004, to January 4, 2005. The main outcome measures were analgesia administration and time to analgesic treatment. Standard comparative statistics were used. Results:, Of the 981 patients enrolled (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] 41 ± 17 years; 65% female), 62% received any analgesic treatment. Men and women had similar mean pain scores, but women were less likely to receive any analgesia (60% vs. 67%, difference 7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1% to 13.6%) and less likely to receive opiates (45% vs. 56%, difference 11%, 95% CI = 4.1% to 17.1%). These differences persisted when gender-specific diagnoses were excluded (47% vs. 56%, difference 9%, 95% CI = 2.5% to 16.2%). After controlling for age, race, triage class, and pain score, women were still 13% to 25% less likely than men to receive opioid analgesia. There was no gender difference in the receipt of nonopioid analgesia. Women waited longer to receive their analgesia (median time 65 minutes vs. 49 minutes, difference 16 minutes, 95% CI = 3.5 to 33 minutes). Conclusions:, Gender bias is a possible explanation for oligoanalgesia in women who present to the ED with acute abdominal pain. Standardized protocols for analgesic administration may ameliorate this discrepancy. [source] Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: Acute abdominal pain and liver CT abnormalitiesJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 11 2000Article first published online: 9 OCT 200 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Utility of eosinophilia as a diagnostic clue in lower abdominal pain in northern Australia: a retrospective case,control studyINTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, Issue 4 2008P. J. Clark Abstract Acute eosinophilic enteritis is a difficult diagnosis to make. Insufficient consideration of eosinophilia may commit patients to surgical treatment when medical therapy may be appropriate. The aim of the study was to determine whether the eosinophil count was considered in the diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with acute abdominal pain who subsequently underwent appendectomy and whether eosinophilia was related to subsequent histology. The method used in the study was retrospective case,control. None of three patients with increased eosinophil counts had histologically proven appendicitis (Fisher's exact test 0.025); worm segments were seen in two patients. None of 39 patients who had histologically proven appendicitis had increased eosinophil counts. Eosinophilia may be underutilized and helminth infection may not be considered in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain. A normal eosinophil count in the setting of clinically suspected appendicitis may make the diagnosis of eosinophilic enteritis less likely, but does not exclude it. Patients with abdominal pain and peripheral eosinophilia appear less likely to have acute appendicitis on subsequent histology; however, further study is required to validate these findings. The decision to operate remains one of clinical judgement. [source] Mycotic aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery in a young womanINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 5 2005P-H Chu Summary Aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is rare. We, in this study, present the case of a 21-year-old woman with a history of heroin abuse who was admitted to our hospital for infective endocarditis complicated by floating vegetation at the posterior mitral valve. After receiving 2-week antibiotic treatment, the patient had acute abdominal pain. Computed tomography demonstrated an aneurysm at the SMA. The mycotic aneurysm was resected and the mitral valve was repaired successfully. This report reviews the pathophysiology of mycotic aneurysms of the SMA and role of computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of this condition from acute mesenteric ischaemia. [source] S100A8/A9: A Potential New Diagnostic Aid for Acute AppendicitisACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 3 2010John F. Bealer MD Abstract Objectives:, Diagnosing acute appendicitis is a daunting clinical challenge, as there is no single test that reliably distinguishes acute appendicitis from other etiologies of acute abdominal pain. In this study, the authors examined whether circulating levels of S100A8/A9 could be useful as a marker to aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods:, Plasma samples from emergency department (ED) patients with acute abdominal pain (n = 181) were tested using an immunoassay for S100A8/A9. Results:, The sensitivity and specificity for S100A8/A9 in diagnosing acute appendicitis were estimated to be 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 81% to 97%) and 54% (95% CI = 45% to 62%), respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) was 96% (95% CI = 89% to 99%), and positive predictive value (PPV) was 37% (95% CI = 28% to 47%). Performance characteristics of elevated white blood cell (WBC) count were also estimated: sensitivity 63% (95% CI = 47% to 76%), specificity 67% (95% CI = 59% to 75%), NPV 86% (95% CI = 78% to 91%), and PPV 36% (95% CI = 26% to 47%). Conclusions:, This is the first report exploring the relationship between circulating S100A8/A9 and acute appendicitis and establishes proof of concept for this biomarker as a diagnostic test for acute appendicitis. Further studies are indicated to optimize the use of this biomarker, in conjunction with other established approaches. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:333,336 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source] Adnexal torsion during pregnancy: Report of four cases and review of the literatureJOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 4pt2 2008Dimitris Hasiakos Abstract Adnexal torsion is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain during pregnancy. It is frequently associated with ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or with ovarian masses, mainly of functional origin. The clinical, laboratory and imaging findings are non-specific. The authors present four cases with adnexal torsion diagnosed during the first trimester of pregnancy. The clinical picture, the mode of diagnosis, and the therapeutic approach are discussed. In two cases, the adnexa was removed, because there was extensive hemorrhage and ischemia. In the other two cases, unwinding of the adnexa was carried out and the ovary was preserved. The diagnosis of adnexal torsion is difficult, especially during pregnancy, and occasionally remains a diagnostic dilemma. It necessitates a prompt surgical intervention, because any delay leads to irreversible ovarian necrosis, so that adnexectomy is ultimately required. [source] Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in an adult horse with enteric SalmonellosisJOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, Issue 3 2006DACVIM, Imogen C. Johns BVSc Abstract Objective: To report a case of enteric Salmonellosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in an adult horse. Case summary: A 7-year-old mare presented for signs of acute abdominal pain. Exploratory laparotomy allowed surgical correction of right dorsal displacement of the large colon with a 180° volvulus at the cecocolic ligament. Postoperatively, the mare developed fevers, leukopenia, and diarrhea. Salmonella newport was cultured from the feces and P. aeruginosa from 2 consecutive blood cultures. The mare responded well to intensive medical therapy. New or unique information provided: Bacteremia associated with colitis is unusual in an adult horse, although the percentage of animals that may be bacteremic is unknown. The bacteria isolated, P. aeruginosa, a common pathogen of other sites in the horse, has not, to our knowledge, been previously reported as a cause of bacteremia and septicemia in an adult horse. [source] Churg-Strauss syndrome revealed by acute abdominal painPEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, Issue 1 2001M. Berlioz MD Abstract We describe a 10-year-old girl with Churg-Strauss syndrome, who presented with acute abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, and pulmonary infiltrates. She had a 6-year history of severe asthma. Bronchoalveolar lavage showed marked eosinophilia. She responded well to high-dose intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy for 3 consecutive days, followed by oral steroids without developing major side effects. This case should remind pediatricians of the rare existence of this vasculitis in children. Relapse is not uncommon, and long-term careful supervision is necessary. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2001; 32:92,94. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Intussusception in children of school agePEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, Issue 1 2007TARO IKEDA Abstract Background: There are only a few reports discussing the characteristics of intussusception developing in school-age children. The characteristics of these cases are discussed, with reference to previous literature. Methods: The present study included eight cases of intussusception in school-age children among 143 intussusception patients treated on an inpatient basis at Nihon University Itabashi Hospital, during the 11 year period from 1993 to 2003. The remaining 135 patients were assigned to the infant group as controls. The clinical characteristics of intussusception in school-age children were compared with those of the condition developing in infants. Results: The eight children of school age with intussusception ranged in age from 8 to 15 years (mean, 11.6 years), and consisted of five boys and three girls. The major symptom was abdominal pain, occurring in 100% (8/8). Bloody stools and vomiting were reported in two patients each (25%) from this group. The triad of abdominal pain, bloody stools and vomiting was recognized in only one child (12.5%) of this group. Two children (25.0%) had a palpable abdominal mass, and one child (12.5%) complained of diarrhea. None of the school-age children with intussusception had any antecedent infection; five, two and one patients had the ileo-colic type, ileo-ileo-colic type and ileo-ileal type of intussusception, respectively. Four underwent enema reduction and four underwent surgical reduction. One of the eight children (12.5%) had underlying organic abnormality; in the remaining children the condition was labeled idiopathic. One child developed recurrences. Conclusions: In school-age children intussusception is generally believed to be commonly secondary to underlying organic abnormality, but in the present study only one of eight school-age children had underlying organic abnormality; in the remaining children, the condition was labeled idiopathic. The major symptom in school-age intussusception was abdominal pain. Therefore this may need to be differentiated from appendicitis in children of school age. It is considered that abdominal ultrasonography (USG) is a simple and useful method for making the diagnosis of intussusception, and that diagnostic USG should be conducted in all school-age children presenting with acute abdominal pain. [source] Clinical spectrum of acute abdominal pain in Turkish pediatric patients: A prospective studyPEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, Issue 3 2004Tülay Erkan AbstractBackground:,The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence, associated symptoms, and clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain who had been admitted to an emergency department. Methods:,Children aged between 2 and 16 years who presented to the emergency department of Cerrahpa,a Medical School, Istanbul University between July 2001 and August 2002 with acute abdominal pain were enrolled in this study. A questionnaire was completed each patient admitted to our pediatric emergency unit for acute abdominal pain. Data collected included presenting signs and symptoms, the hospital follow up for all children who returned within 10 days, test results, and telephone follow up. Results:,The number of children referred to the emergency department was 7442, with 399 (5.4%) of these having acute abdominal pain. The mean age of the study population was 6.9 ± 3.5 years, and 201 of the patients were male. The five most prevalent diagnoses were: (i) upper respiratory tract infection and/or complicated with otitis media or sinusitis (23.7%); (ii) abdominal pain with uncertain etiology (15.4%); (iii) gastroenteritis (15.4%); (iv) constipation (9.4%); and (v) urinary tract infection (8%). The most common associated symptoms were decreased appetite, fever and emesis. Because of follow-up deficiency the progress of 28 patients was not obtained. Eighty-two children were referred to the department of pediatric surgery, but only 17 of 82 (20.7%) required surgical intervention (15 of these 17 for appendicitis). Eleven patients returned within 10 days for re-evaluation, but the initial diagnosis was not changed. The complaints of 57 patients with uncertain etiology were resolved within 2 days. Conclusions:,An acute complaint of abdominal pain was usually attributed to a self-limited disease. However, the percentage of surgical etiology is not negligible. [source] The Association between Emergency Department Crowding and Analgesia Administration in Acute Abdominal Pain PatientsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 7 2009Angela M. Mills MD Abstract Objectives:, The authors assessed the effect of emergency department (ED) crowding on the nontreatment and delay in treatment for analgesia in patients who had acute abdominal pain. Methods:, This was a secondary analysis of prospectively enrolled nonpregnant adult patients presenting to an urban teaching ED with abdominal pain during a 9-month period. Each patient had four validated crowding measures assigned at triage. Main outcomes were the administration of and delays in time to analgesia. A delay was defined as waiting more than 1 hour for analgesia. Relative risk (RR) regression was used to test the effects of crowding on outcomes. Results:, A total of 976 abdominal pain patients (mean [±standard deviation] age = 41 [±16.6] years; 65% female, 62% black) were enrolled, of whom 649 (67%) received any analgesia. Of those treated, 457 (70%) experienced a delay in analgesia from triage, and 320 (49%) experienced a delay in analgesia after room placement. After adjusting for possible confounders of the ED administration of analgesia (age, sex, race, triage class, severe pain, final diagnosis of either abdominal pain not otherwise specified or gastroenteritis), increasing delays in time to analgesia from triage were independently associated with all four crowding measures, comparing the lowest to the highest quartile of crowding (total patient-care hours RR = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32 to 1.80; occupancy rate RR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.42 to 1.91; inpatient number RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.36 to 1.81; and waiting room number RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.77). Crowding measures were not associated with the failure to treat with analgesia. Conclusions:, Emergency department crowding is associated with delays in analgesic treatment from the time of triage in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. [source] Laparoscopic treatment of primary omental torsion: Case report and literature reviewASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, Issue 1 2010GR. Portillo Abstract Omental torsion is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain. The diagnosis is rarely made preoperatively. The treatment has been classically open. We present a case of omental torsion laparoscopically. A 63-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department. The patient had a right upper quadrant pain that started 3 d before his admission. The omentum was freed in a blunt fashion by identifying a point of torsion in the base of the mass. Partial omentectomy was performed with the assistance of a harmonic scalpel. The specimen was retrieved in a bag through a 3 cm left flank incision extended from a 10 mm port site. The pathology evaluation revealed an infarcted omentum. The patient had instant relief of pain, and the recovery was uneventful, with the patient beings discharged 2 d postoperative. The laparoscopic treatment of omental torsion is a safe, feasible and effective alternative. [source] Patients' recall of clinical information following laparoscopy for acute abdominal painBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2004S. M. Murphy Background: Failures in doctor,patient communication and patients' understanding continue to confound improvements in the delivery of quality healthcare. In the context of acute abdominal pain managed by means of laparoscopy, it was hypothesized that patients are either not adequately informed, or do not reliably retain simple relevant information transmitted at the time of the procedure. This study was designed to evaluate the reliability of information transfer between doctor and patient in this setting, including the diagnosis and whether or not the appendix was removed. Methods: A retrospective study of 350 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopy for acute abdominal pain over 3·5 years was designed. Each patient completed a telephone questionnaire that was used to evaluate the accuracy of patients' information. Results: In total, 26·9 per cent of patients did not know or were incorrect regarding the surgical procedure performed. Similarly, 20·0 per cent of all patients did not know or were incorrect regarding the status of their appendix after surgery and 30·0 per cent of patients were incorrect regarding the diagnosis. Despite all of these statistics, 91·4 per cent of patients were happy with the information they had received regarding the procedure. Conclusion: Some 26·9 per cent of patients who underwent laparoscopy for acute abdominal pain were incorrect or did not know about the procedure that had been performed. This could lead to a further unnecessary operation should they re-present with similar symptoms. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Serum amyloid A is a better early predictor of severity than C-reactive protein in acute pancreatitis,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 2 2002J. M. Mayer Background: Serum amyloid A (SAA) is an early and sensitive marker of the extent of tissue trauma and inflammation. The aim of this study was to compare the early prognostic accuracy of SAA with that of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in acute pancreatitis. Methods: In a prospective multicentre trial, plasma SAA and CRP levels were measured in patients with severe and mild acute pancreatitis, and in a control group with acute abdominal pain. Plasma samples were collected on admission and at 6-h intervals for 48 h, every 12 h between 48 and 72 h, then daily for 5 days. Plasma SAA was measured by a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and CRP was measured by immunoturbidometry. Results: There were 137 patients with mild and 35 with severe acute pancreatitis, and 74 control patients. SAA levels were significantly higher in patients with severe acute pancreatitis than in those with mild acute pancreatitis, on admission, at 24 h or less after symptom onset, and subsequently. Whereas plasma CRP concentration was also significantly higher in patients with severe acute pancreatitis on admission, it failed to distinguish mild from severe acute pancreatitis until 30,36 h after symptom onset. SAA levels predicted severity (sensitivity 67 per cent, specificity 70 per cent, negative predictive value 89 per cent, mean(s.d.) area under curve 0·7(0·05)) significantly better than CRP (57 per cent, 60 per cent, 84 per cent, 0·59(0·06) respectively) on admission (P = 0·02) and at 24 h following symptom onset (area under curve 0·65(0·09) versus 0·58(0·09) respectively; P , 0·02). Conclusion: Plasma SAA concentration is an early marker of severity in acute pancreatitis and is superior to CRP estimation on hospital admission and at 24 h or less after symptom onset. This study suggests that plasma SAA concentration is clinically useful, with the potential to replace CRP in the management of acute pancreatitis. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Reliable screening for acute pancreatitis with rapid urine trypsinogen-2 test stripBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 1 2000Dr M.-L. Background: This study was designed to evaluate the validity of a new rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip (Actim Pancreatitis) for detection of acute pancreatitis in patients with acute abdominal pain. Methods: A total of 525 consecutive patients presenting with abdominal pain at two emergency units was included prospectively and tested with the Actim Pancreatitis test strip. Urine trypsinogen-2 concentrations were also determined by a quantitative method. The diagnosis and assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis was based on raised serum and urinary amylase levels, clinical features and findings on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Results: In 45 patients the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis could be established. The Actim Pancreatitis test strip result was positive in 43 of them resulting in a sensitivity of 96 per cent. Thirty-seven false-positive Actim Pancreatitis test strips were obtained in patients with non-pancreatic abdominal pain resulting in a specificity of 92 per cent. Nine patients with severe acute pancreatitis were all detected by the dipstick. Conclusion: A negative Actim Pancreatitis strip result excludes acute pancreatitis with high probability. Positive results indicate the need for further evaluation, i.e. other enzyme measurements and/or radiological examinations. The test is easy and rapid to perform, unequivocal in its interpretation and can be used in healthcare units lacking laboratory facilities. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Gender Disparity in Analgesic Treatment of Emergency Department Patients with Acute Abdominal PainACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 5 2008Esther H. Chen MD Abstract Objectives:, Oligoanalgesia for acute abdominal pain historically has been attributed to the provider's fear of masking serious underlying pathology. The authors assessed whether a gender disparity exists in the administration of analgesia for acute abdominal pain. Methods:, This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive nonpregnant adults with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain of less than 72 hours' duration who presented to an urban emergency department (ED) from April 5, 2004, to January 4, 2005. The main outcome measures were analgesia administration and time to analgesic treatment. Standard comparative statistics were used. Results:, Of the 981 patients enrolled (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] 41 ± 17 years; 65% female), 62% received any analgesic treatment. Men and women had similar mean pain scores, but women were less likely to receive any analgesia (60% vs. 67%, difference 7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1% to 13.6%) and less likely to receive opiates (45% vs. 56%, difference 11%, 95% CI = 4.1% to 17.1%). These differences persisted when gender-specific diagnoses were excluded (47% vs. 56%, difference 9%, 95% CI = 2.5% to 16.2%). After controlling for age, race, triage class, and pain score, women were still 13% to 25% less likely than men to receive opioid analgesia. There was no gender difference in the receipt of nonopioid analgesia. Women waited longer to receive their analgesia (median time 65 minutes vs. 49 minutes, difference 16 minutes, 95% CI = 3.5 to 33 minutes). Conclusions:, Gender bias is a possible explanation for oligoanalgesia in women who present to the ED with acute abdominal pain. Standardized protocols for analgesic administration may ameliorate this discrepancy. [source] Comparison of Pediatric Emergency Physicians' and Surgeons' Evaluation and Diagnosis of AppendicitisACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 2 2008Anupam B. Kharbanda MD Abstract Objectives:, To compare the interexaminer reliability and ability to predict appendicitis between pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) and senior surgical residents. Methods:, The authors conducted a prospective cohort study of children aged 3 to 18 years of age with signs and symptoms suspicious for appendicitis. Patients were initially examined by a pediatric EP attending and then by a consulting senior surgical resident. Physicians reported the presence or absence of specific historical and physical exam findings and predicted the likelihood the patient had appendicitis. Interexaminer reliability of historical and physical exam findings was compared (kappa statistic). Distributions and median probabilities of appendicitis were calculated for pediatric EP and surgeon predictions. Results:, The authors evaluated 350 patients with acute abdominal pain. Historical questions revealed slight to very good agreement (kappa statistic range 0.33,0.82) between physician types, whereas physical examination findings exhibited poor to fair agreement (range 0.14,0.48). Physicians predicted similar median probabilities of appendicitis for patients who were ultimately diagnosed with appendicitis (75% vs. 70%; p = 0.73) and patients without appendicitis (25% vs. 30%; p = 0.59). For a subset of patients given a , 90% predicted probability of appendicitis, pediatric EPs and senior surgical residents had similar accuracy (80% vs. 79%; p = 0.92). Similarly, among patients with , 10% predicted probability, pediatric EPs were correct in 95% and senior surgical residents correct in 94% of patients (p = 0.63). Conclusions:, Pediatric EPs and senior surgical residents elicit historical findings from patients with suspected appendicitis with a greater degree of similarity than physical examination findings, which exhibit a wide degree of variability. Pediatric EPs and senior surgical residents do not differ in their ability to clinically predict appendicitis. These findings may be helpful in developing institutional management protocols. [source] |