|
| ||
|
|
||
Chronic Renal Dysfunction (chronic + renal_dysfunction)
Selected AbstractsMycophenolate mofetil in combination with reduction of calcineurin inhibitors for chronic renal dysfunction after liver transplantation,LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2006Georges-Philippe Pageaux The purpose of the study was to introduce mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction to decrease calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dosages without increasing rejection risk. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized study, chronic CNI-related renal dysfunction was defined by an increase in serum creatinine with values >140 ,mol/L and <300 ,mol/L. Patients were randomized in 2 groups. Study group: combination of MMF (2 to 3 g/day) and reduced dose of CNI ,50% of initial dose; control group: no MMF, but with the ability to reduce CNI doses, but not below 75% of initial dose. Fifty-six patients were included, 27 in the study group and 29 in the control group. In the study group, there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine values, from 171.7 ± 24.2 ,mol/L at day 0 to 143.4 ± 19 ,mol/L at month 12 and a significant increase in creatinine clearance, from 42.6 ± 10.9 mL/min to 51.7 ± 13.8 mL/min. No rejection episode was observed in the study group. In the control group, there was no improvement of renal function, assessed by the changes in serum creatinine values, from 175.4 ± 23.4 ,mol/L at day 0 to 181.6 ± 63 ,mol/L at month 12, and in creatinine clearance, from 42.8 ± 12.8 mL/min to 44.8 ± 19.7 mL/min. The differences between the 2 groups were significant: P = 0.001 for serum creatinine, and P = 0.04 for creatinine clearance. In conclusion, the introduction of MMF combined with the reduction of at least 50% of CNI dose allowed the renal function of liver transplant recipients to significantly improve at 1 year, without any rejection episode and without significant secondary effects. Liver Transpl 12:1755,1760, 2006. © 2006 AASLD. [source] Azathioprine in Liver Transplantation: A Reevaluation of Its Use and a Comparison with Mycophenolate MofetilAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2009G. Germani Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) combined with steroids with or without azathioprine (AZA), have been a standard immunosuppression regimen after liver transplantation (LT). Since 2000 many centers have substituted AZA by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). However, in LT the superiority of MMF over AZA is not clearly demonstrated. Therefore, we questioned the benefit of MMF versus AZA in LT with regard to rejection, renal dysfunction and hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence and survival. Using a literature search, relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies were identified: two RCTs compared MMF to AZA only for acute rejection. Treated rejection was less with MMF in only one RCT (38.5% vs. 47.7%; p = 0.025), with no difference in patient and graft survival. No RCTs compared MMF and AZA in patients with CNI-related chronic renal dysfunction. Among two studies evaluating MMF, with substitution of AZA, one was stopped due to severe rejection. Recurrent HCV was less severe in 5/9 studies with AZA compared with 2/17 using MMF, six of which documented worse recurrence. Published data in LT show little, if any, clinical benefit of MMF versus AZA. RCTs should reevaluate AZA in LT. Evaluation of HCV replication and recurrence will be particularly important as AZA may have advantages over MMF. [source] Mycophenolate Mofetil Monotherapy for Severe Side Effects of Calcineurin Inhibitors Following Liver TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2009S. Dharancy Withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) followed by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy after liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial due to the increased risk of acute rejection and graft loss. The aim of the present study, performed in a large cohort of liver-transplanted patients with severe CNI-induced side effects, was to assess renal function recovery, and safety in terms of liver function, of complete CNI withdrawal and replacement by MMF monotherapy. Fifty-two patients treated with MMF monotherapy for CNI-induced toxicity were analyzed. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased significantly during the period of MMF monotherapy, from 37 ± 10 to 44.7 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 6 months (p = 0.001) corresponding to a benefit of +17.4% in renal function. eGFR stabilized or improved in 86.5%, 81% and 79% of cases, and chronic renal dysfunction worsened in 13.5%, 19% and 21% of cases, at 6, 12 and 24 months after CNI withdrawal, respectively. Only two patients experienced acute rejection. MMF monotherapy may be efficient at reversing/stabilizing CRD, and appears relatively safe in terms of liver graft function in long-term liver-transplanted patients. However, clinicians must bear in mind the potential risk of rejection and graft loss, and should be very cautious in the management of such ,difficult-to-treat patients'. [source] UR-3216: A Manageable Oral GPIIb/IIIa AntagonistCARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2001Kosuke Baba ABSTRACT UR-3216, a prodrug, is a novel, selective, and orally active platelet surface glycoprotein GPIIb/IIIa) receptor antagonist. The most important property of UR-3216 is the very tight binding of its active metabolite to platelets (Ki for resting platelets is <1 nM). UR-2992, the active form of UR-3216, binds to platelets for a long period of time, while the unbound drug is rapidly cleared. Therefore, after an initial loading dose of 0.1 mg/kg, only once daily repeated low maintenance doses of UR-3216 (<0.05 mg/kg p.o.) are required. This regimen maintains a high level of inhibition of platelet aggregation and, due to a small peak-to-trough ratio, severe bleeding is avoided. The therapy with UR-3216 is easy to manage, because it has low peak-to-trough ratio and high efficacy (>80% inhibition of platelet aggregation). In addition, UR-3216 does not produce excessive bleeding or thrombocytopenia and does not interact with abciximab. UR-3216 is excreted mostly in bile, so that it will not accumulate in patients with chronic renal dysfunction. UR-2316 has the following abciximab-like features: (a) its half-lives for residence on platelets, inhibition of platelets aggregation and bleeding time prolongation are 60 to 80 h, 24, and 2 h, respectively; (b) its receptor binding occupancy is similar to that of abciximab (Mab1 is inhibited and Mab2 is unaltered). In conclusion, UR-3216 is a promising, orally active GPIIb/IIIa antagonist for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. [source] | ||||||||||