|
| ||
|
|
||
Chronic Polyneuropathy (chronic + polyneuropathy)
Selected AbstractsPREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS IN CHRONIC POLYNEUROPATHY IN THE ELDERLYJOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Issue 1 2002E. Scarpini The elderly are a population at high risk of polyneuropathy because there is a correlation between age and impairment of the peripheral nervous system and because the number of agents that can damage peripheral nerves, including chronic systemic disorders and neurotoxic drugs, increases with age. The Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA), a multicenter project designed to study age-associated diseases, collected data from 8 Italian municipalities. For this study, the definition of peripheral neuropathy by P.J. Dyck (1982) was used. However, only peripheral neuropathies with distal and symmetrical involvement of lower limbs were considered. Diagnosis was articulated in two phases: Phase 1 or screening, administered to all participants. The criteria were: a) self reported diagnosis; b) presence of at least one neurological symptom; and c) presence of at least one positive test at short neurological evaluation. A validation of the screening instruments was performed. Phase 2 or clinical confirmation by a neurologist, based on: a) review of the clinical records; b) a neurological examination; c) a clinical history of the disease; and, d) when available, EMG, blood and spinal fluid examination, and a sural nerve biopsy. Three diagnostic categories were identified: possible, probable and definite DSNLL. The neuropathy was classified as definite only when confirmation by a positive EMG was available. A random sample of 5632 subjects aged 65,84 years was evaluated. A total number of 337 DSNLL were identified (possible, probable, defined). The prevalence is 6.5% (95% C.I. 5.8,7.2) in men and women; the rates by age, geographic area, and clinical severity are described, and the prevalence in the different groups of diabetic patients and non-diabetic subjects is analyzed. The prevalence obtained in our study is slightly lower than that in a similar recent multicentric study (IGPSG, 1995), but the diagnostic criteria were different. Diabetes is the most common associated disorder with the 20.8% of association, followed by toxic/drug exposure (5% of association). [source] Approach to the patient with chronic polyneuropathyACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2007Å. Mygland Background ,, Chronic polyneuropathy is a common disorder with heterogenic clinical presentation and many different etiologies. Diagnostic investigation is challenging. Materials and methods ,, An algorithm for diagnostic investigation of chronic polyneuropathy is presented. It was designed to secure practical usefulness for general neurologists, identification of the most common causes with an adequate number of laboratory tests, and more focused investigation when necessary. The proposal is based on review of articles found by PubMed search using the terms ,,peripheral neuropathy, cause, and investigation'', relevant book chapters, and own clinical experience. Results ,, All patients should undergo a routine investigation for the most common causes of polyneuropathy by asking for diabetes, heredity, alcohol abuse, toxic medications and agents, symptoms of Sjögren's syndrome, renal failure, and the following laboratory tests; glucose, haemoglobin, leucocytes, thrombocytes, ESR, creatinin, ALAT, GT, vitamin B12, serum electrophoresis, TSH and thyroxin. If routine investigation is negative, a targeted approach based on clinical type and electrophysiological findings is recommended. The most common type with slowly progressive, symmetric sensory symptoms beginning in the feet can often be classified as cryptogenic without further investigation. Polyneuropathies with subacute onset, progressive weakness, asymmetric symptoms, proximal weakness, selective involvement of sensory fibers or demyelinating pathology, or other organ manifestations, have various etiologies that necessitate individual focused investigation. Interpretation ,, Diagnostic investigation of polyneuropathy can be simplified and systematized. [source] Chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy in graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantationNEUROPATHOLOGY, Issue 1 2002Toshiko Nagashima In recent years a novel problem has arisen in organ transplantation medicine, namely GVHD. The nervous system has been involved mainly at the level of the CNS and this can lead to a serious outcome for the patient. In rare cases, peripheral nerves may be affected and show acute or chronic polyneuropathy. Here a case is reported of polyneuropathy associated with chronic GVHD. A 32-year-old man, suffering from chronic GVHD following an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for malignant lymphoma at the age of 25, developed a motor dominant polyneuropathy 5 years later. Electrophysiologic studies demonstrated the demyelinating type of polyneuropathy. Biopsy specimens from skin and skeletal muscle disclosed perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates expressing T-cell markers. The sural nerve showed a loss of myelinated nerve fibers with epineurial fibrosis and rare occurrence of T cells, but without obvious vasculitic changes. The present case suggested that polyneuropathy could develop in association with chronic GVHD in some patients with a longstanding disease course. [source] Approach to the patient with chronic polyneuropathyACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2007Å. Mygland Background ,, Chronic polyneuropathy is a common disorder with heterogenic clinical presentation and many different etiologies. Diagnostic investigation is challenging. Materials and methods ,, An algorithm for diagnostic investigation of chronic polyneuropathy is presented. It was designed to secure practical usefulness for general neurologists, identification of the most common causes with an adequate number of laboratory tests, and more focused investigation when necessary. The proposal is based on review of articles found by PubMed search using the terms ,,peripheral neuropathy, cause, and investigation'', relevant book chapters, and own clinical experience. Results ,, All patients should undergo a routine investigation for the most common causes of polyneuropathy by asking for diabetes, heredity, alcohol abuse, toxic medications and agents, symptoms of Sjögren's syndrome, renal failure, and the following laboratory tests; glucose, haemoglobin, leucocytes, thrombocytes, ESR, creatinin, ALAT, GT, vitamin B12, serum electrophoresis, TSH and thyroxin. If routine investigation is negative, a targeted approach based on clinical type and electrophysiological findings is recommended. The most common type with slowly progressive, symmetric sensory symptoms beginning in the feet can often be classified as cryptogenic without further investigation. Polyneuropathies with subacute onset, progressive weakness, asymmetric symptoms, proximal weakness, selective involvement of sensory fibers or demyelinating pathology, or other organ manifestations, have various etiologies that necessitate individual focused investigation. Interpretation ,, Diagnostic investigation of polyneuropathy can be simplified and systematized. [source] | ||||||||||