| |||
Cesarean Section Rate (cesarean + section_rate)
Selected AbstractsSoaring Cesarean Section Rates: A Cause for AlarmJOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC, GYNECOLOGIC & NEONATAL NURSING, Issue 3 2003Deanne R. Williams CNM, MS executive director No abstract is available for this article. [source] The Institutional Factor in Cesarean Section RatesJOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC, GYNECOLOGIC & NEONATAL NURSING, Issue 3 2002Nancy K. Lowe RN, PhD Editor No abstract is available for this article. [source] Evidence-Based Strategies for Reducing Cesarean Section Rates: A Meta-AnalysisBIRTH, Issue 1 2007Nils Chaillet PhD ABSTRACT: Background: Canada's cesarean section rate reached an all-time high of 22.5 percent of in-hospital deliveries in 2002 and was associated with potential maternal and neonatal complications. Clinical practice guidelines represent an appropriate mean for reducing cesarean section rates. The challenge now lies in implementing these guidelines. Objectives of this meta-analysis were to assess the effectiveness of interventions for reducing the cesarean section rate and to assess the impact of this reduction on maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Methods: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were consulted from January 1990 to June 2005. Additional studies were identified by screening reference lists from identified studies and expert suggestions. Studies involving rigorous evaluation of a strategy for reducing overall cesarean section rates were identified. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series studies were evaluated according to Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group criteria. Results: Among the 10 included studies, a significant reduction of cesarean section rate was found by random meta-analysis (pooled RR = 0.81 [0.75, 0.87]). No evidence of publication bias was identified. Audit and feedback (pooled RR = 0.87 [0.81, 0.93]), quality improvement (pooled RR = 0.74 [0.70, 0.77]), and multifaceted strategies (pooled RR=0.73 [0.68, 0.79]) were effective for reducing the cesarean section rate. However, quality improvement based on active management of labor showed mixed effects. Design of studies showed a higher effect for noncontrolled studies than for controlled studies (pooled RR = 0.76 [0.72, 0.81] vs 0.92 [0.88, 0.96]). Studies including an identification of barriers to change were more effective than other interventions for reducing the cesarean section rate (pooled RR = 0.74 [0.71, 0.78] vs 0.88 [0.82, 0.94]). Among included studies, no significant differences were found for perinatal and neonatal mortality and perinatal and maternal morbidity with respect to the mode of delivery. Only 1 study showed a significant reduction of neonatal and perinatal mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The cesarean section rate can be safely reduced by interventions that involve health workers in analyzing and modifying their practice. Our results suggest that multifaceted strategies, based on audit and detailed feedback, are advised to improve clinical practice and effectively reduce cesarean section rates. Moreover, these findings support the assumption that identification of barriers to change is a major key to success. (BIRTH 34:1 March 2007) [source] Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological StudyBIRTH, Issue 4 2006Fernando Althabe MD ABSTRACT: Background: Cesarean section rates show a wide variation among countries in the world, ranging from 0.4 to 40 percent, and a continuous rise in the trend has been observed in the past 30 years. Our aim was to explore the association of cesarean section rates of different countries with their maternal and neonatal mortality and to test the hypothesis that in low-income countries, increasing cesarean section rates were associated with reductions in both outcomes, whereas in high-income countries, such association did not exist. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional multigroup ecological study using data from 119 countries from 1991 to 2003. These countries were classified into 3 categories: low-income (59 countries), medium-income (31 countries), and high-income (29 countries) countries according to an international classification. We assessed the ecological association between national cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality by fitting multiple linear regression models. Results: Median cesarean section rates were lower in low-income than in medium- and high-income countries. Seventy-six percent of the low-income countries, 16 percent of the medium-income countries, and 3 percent of high-income countries showed cesarean section rates between 0 and 10 percent. Three percent of low-income countries, 36 percent of medium-income countries, and 31 percent of high-income countries showed cesarean section rates above 20 percent. In low-income countries, a negative and statistically significant linear correlation was observed between cesarean section rates and neonatal mortality and between cesarean section rates and maternal mortality. No association was observed in medium- and high-income countries for either neonatal mortality or maternal mortality. Conclusions: No association between cesarean section rates and maternal or neonatal mortality was shown in medium- and high-income countries. Thus, it becomes relevant for future good-quality research to assess the effect of the high figures of cesarean section rates on maternal and neonatal morbidity. For low-income countries, and on confirmation by further research, making cesarean section available for high-risk pregnancies could contribute to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, whereas a system of care with cesarean section rates below 10 percent would be unlikely to cover their needs. (BIRTH 33:4 December 2006) [source] Epidemic of Cesarean Section at the General, Private and University Hospitals in ThailandJOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 5 2000Dr. Boonsri Chanrachakul Abstract Objective: To undertake a survey of cesarean section in the general, private and university hospitals in Thailand. Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent to all the general, private and university hospitals with 200 beds or more. The questionnaires were prepared to find out the percentage, the indications and the trend of cesarean delivery, the measures taken to decrease cesarean section rate, and the practice of external cephalic version (ECV) and vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) in the hospitals. Results: The overall response rate was 88%. Mean cesarean section rates were 24, 48, and 22% in the general, private and university hospitals, respectively. Cesarean section rates in most of the hospitals were increased in the past 5 years namely 78% in the general hospitals, 50% in the private hospitals, 66% in the university hospitals. However, only 38% of the hospitals had measures to regulate this operation. Repeated cesarean section was the most common indication in the private (63%) and the university hospitals (88%) while failure to progress was the most common indication in the general hospitals (55%). ECV and VBAC were performed in 26 and 12% of the hospitals. They were, however, not the standard practices. Conclusion: Rising of cesarean section rate without any measure to regulate it is the problem in the developing countries. Standardised labor management and reduction of unnecessary primary cesarean section will automatically reduce repeated operation and overall cesarean section. [source] Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological StudyBIRTH, Issue 4 2006Fernando Althabe MD ABSTRACT: Background: Cesarean section rates show a wide variation among countries in the world, ranging from 0.4 to 40 percent, and a continuous rise in the trend has been observed in the past 30 years. Our aim was to explore the association of cesarean section rates of different countries with their maternal and neonatal mortality and to test the hypothesis that in low-income countries, increasing cesarean section rates were associated with reductions in both outcomes, whereas in high-income countries, such association did not exist. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional multigroup ecological study using data from 119 countries from 1991 to 2003. These countries were classified into 3 categories: low-income (59 countries), medium-income (31 countries), and high-income (29 countries) countries according to an international classification. We assessed the ecological association between national cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality by fitting multiple linear regression models. Results: Median cesarean section rates were lower in low-income than in medium- and high-income countries. Seventy-six percent of the low-income countries, 16 percent of the medium-income countries, and 3 percent of high-income countries showed cesarean section rates between 0 and 10 percent. Three percent of low-income countries, 36 percent of medium-income countries, and 31 percent of high-income countries showed cesarean section rates above 20 percent. In low-income countries, a negative and statistically significant linear correlation was observed between cesarean section rates and neonatal mortality and between cesarean section rates and maternal mortality. No association was observed in medium- and high-income countries for either neonatal mortality or maternal mortality. Conclusions: No association between cesarean section rates and maternal or neonatal mortality was shown in medium- and high-income countries. Thus, it becomes relevant for future good-quality research to assess the effect of the high figures of cesarean section rates on maternal and neonatal morbidity. For low-income countries, and on confirmation by further research, making cesarean section available for high-risk pregnancies could contribute to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, whereas a system of care with cesarean section rates below 10 percent would be unlikely to cover their needs. (BIRTH 33:4 December 2006) [source] Does a change in obstetric management influence the incidence of traumatic birth lesions in mature, otherwise healthy newborn infants?JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 4 2007Willibald Zeck Abstract Aim:, The incidence of lesions due to birth trauma can be generally regarded as a characteristic of obstetric management; since obstetric management has changed through the years, one might expect a decrease or increase of lesions due to birth trauma in mature newborn infants. Methods:, In a retrospective study, the incidence of lesions due to birth trauma was recorded in the year 2000. In 1989, an identical study had already been carried out in the same department, employing the same criteria. The new findings were compared with the historical data. Results:, In the year 1989 24.6% and in 2000 13.2% showed lesions due to obstetric trauma. The episiotomy rate and lesions due to birth trauma had significantly decreased. A decline regarding the traumas per se was noticed in caput succedaneum traumas, in hematomas due to birth trauma and in clavicle fracture. The cesarean section rate among the study group increased. The cesarean section rate among the traumatized newborns decreased. Conclusion:, Episiotomy does not prevent newborns from traumatic lesions. Gestational age and birthweight have not significantly changed throughout the years; therefore an increase in the cesarean section rate must have contributed to the decrease of birth traumas. Even during abdominal operative delivery, obstetric traumas in newborns do occur. However, an increase in cesarean sections alone can not thoroughly explain the reduction of birth lesion among newborns. Improvement in prenatal diagnostic tools and procedures, respectively, and a goal-oriented use of labor induction might also play a major role. [source] Epidemic of Cesarean Section at the General, Private and University Hospitals in ThailandJOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 5 2000Dr. Boonsri Chanrachakul Abstract Objective: To undertake a survey of cesarean section in the general, private and university hospitals in Thailand. Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent to all the general, private and university hospitals with 200 beds or more. The questionnaires were prepared to find out the percentage, the indications and the trend of cesarean delivery, the measures taken to decrease cesarean section rate, and the practice of external cephalic version (ECV) and vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) in the hospitals. Results: The overall response rate was 88%. Mean cesarean section rates were 24, 48, and 22% in the general, private and university hospitals, respectively. Cesarean section rates in most of the hospitals were increased in the past 5 years namely 78% in the general hospitals, 50% in the private hospitals, 66% in the university hospitals. However, only 38% of the hospitals had measures to regulate this operation. Repeated cesarean section was the most common indication in the private (63%) and the university hospitals (88%) while failure to progress was the most common indication in the general hospitals (55%). ECV and VBAC were performed in 26 and 12% of the hospitals. They were, however, not the standard practices. Conclusion: Rising of cesarean section rate without any measure to regulate it is the problem in the developing countries. Standardised labor management and reduction of unnecessary primary cesarean section will automatically reduce repeated operation and overall cesarean section. [source] Taiwan's High Rate of Cesarean Births: Impacts of National Health Insurance and Fetal Gender PreferenceBIRTH, Issue 2 2007Tsai-Ching Liu PhD ABSTRACT: Background: Taiwan has a high rate of cesarean section, approximately 33 percent in the past decade. This study investigates and discusses 2 possible factors that may encourage the practice, one of which is fetal gender difference and the other is Taiwan's recently implemented National Health Insurance (NHI). Methods: A logistic regression model was used with the 1989 and 1996 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and with the 2001 to 2003 NHI Research Databases. Results: Using survey data, we found a statistically significant 0.3 percent gender difference in parental choice for cesarean section. However, no statistically significant difference was found in the rate of cesarean section before and after NHI implementation. Conclusions: Taiwan's high cesarean section rate is not directly related to financial incentives under NHI, indicating that adjusting policy to lower financial incentives from NHI would have only limited effect. Likewise, focusing effort on the small gender difference is unlikely to have much impact. Effective campaigns by health authorities might be conducted to educate the general population about risks associated with cesarean section and the benefits of vaginal birth to the child, mother, and society. (BIRTH 34:2 June 2007) [source] Evidence-Based Strategies for Reducing Cesarean Section Rates: A Meta-AnalysisBIRTH, Issue 1 2007Nils Chaillet PhD ABSTRACT: Background: Canada's cesarean section rate reached an all-time high of 22.5 percent of in-hospital deliveries in 2002 and was associated with potential maternal and neonatal complications. Clinical practice guidelines represent an appropriate mean for reducing cesarean section rates. The challenge now lies in implementing these guidelines. Objectives of this meta-analysis were to assess the effectiveness of interventions for reducing the cesarean section rate and to assess the impact of this reduction on maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Methods: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were consulted from January 1990 to June 2005. Additional studies were identified by screening reference lists from identified studies and expert suggestions. Studies involving rigorous evaluation of a strategy for reducing overall cesarean section rates were identified. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series studies were evaluated according to Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group criteria. Results: Among the 10 included studies, a significant reduction of cesarean section rate was found by random meta-analysis (pooled RR = 0.81 [0.75, 0.87]). No evidence of publication bias was identified. Audit and feedback (pooled RR = 0.87 [0.81, 0.93]), quality improvement (pooled RR = 0.74 [0.70, 0.77]), and multifaceted strategies (pooled RR=0.73 [0.68, 0.79]) were effective for reducing the cesarean section rate. However, quality improvement based on active management of labor showed mixed effects. Design of studies showed a higher effect for noncontrolled studies than for controlled studies (pooled RR = 0.76 [0.72, 0.81] vs 0.92 [0.88, 0.96]). Studies including an identification of barriers to change were more effective than other interventions for reducing the cesarean section rate (pooled RR = 0.74 [0.71, 0.78] vs 0.88 [0.82, 0.94]). Among included studies, no significant differences were found for perinatal and neonatal mortality and perinatal and maternal morbidity with respect to the mode of delivery. Only 1 study showed a significant reduction of neonatal and perinatal mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The cesarean section rate can be safely reduced by interventions that involve health workers in analyzing and modifying their practice. Our results suggest that multifaceted strategies, based on audit and detailed feedback, are advised to improve clinical practice and effectively reduce cesarean section rates. Moreover, these findings support the assumption that identification of barriers to change is a major key to success. (BIRTH 34:1 March 2007) [source] Cesarean Delivery in Shantou, China: A Retrospective Analysis of 1922 WomenBIRTH, Issue 2 2000Wang-ling Wu MD Background:In China the cesarean section rate increased significantly during the past four decades. This study examined the frequency and indications of cesarean birth in Shantou, a southern city in China.Methods:An analysis was conducted of the medical records of 1922 women who had cesarean deliveries at Shantou City 2nd People's Hospital between January 1990 and December 1997. The medical records of 10,490 women who gave birth during this period were examined.Results:The average rate of cesarean delivery during the 8-year period was 19.4 ± 2.3 percent (means ± standard error). From 1990 to 1997 the cesarean delivery rates ranged from 11.05 to 29.9 percent, respectively, although during this period the total annual number of deliveries decreased significantly from 1683 to 951. The rates of the most common indications per 100 women for cesarean delivery were failure to progress (23%), premature rupture of membranes (20%), fetal distress (19.4%), breech presentation (18.1%), uterine scar (14.6%), and prolonged pregnancy (11.3%).Conclusion:The cesarean delivery rate in Shantou, China, has increased steadily and significantly between 1990 and 1997, despite a decrease in the total number of births during the same period. This study showed that on an individual basis vaginal delivery was often possible and reduction of the cesarean delivery rate could be achieved safely by paying greater heed to appropriate indications. [source] Epidemic of Cesarean Section at the General, Private and University Hospitals in ThailandJOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 5 2000Dr. Boonsri Chanrachakul Abstract Objective: To undertake a survey of cesarean section in the general, private and university hospitals in Thailand. Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent to all the general, private and university hospitals with 200 beds or more. The questionnaires were prepared to find out the percentage, the indications and the trend of cesarean delivery, the measures taken to decrease cesarean section rate, and the practice of external cephalic version (ECV) and vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) in the hospitals. Results: The overall response rate was 88%. Mean cesarean section rates were 24, 48, and 22% in the general, private and university hospitals, respectively. Cesarean section rates in most of the hospitals were increased in the past 5 years namely 78% in the general hospitals, 50% in the private hospitals, 66% in the university hospitals. However, only 38% of the hospitals had measures to regulate this operation. Repeated cesarean section was the most common indication in the private (63%) and the university hospitals (88%) while failure to progress was the most common indication in the general hospitals (55%). ECV and VBAC were performed in 26 and 12% of the hospitals. They were, however, not the standard practices. Conclusion: Rising of cesarean section rate without any measure to regulate it is the problem in the developing countries. Standardised labor management and reduction of unnecessary primary cesarean section will automatically reduce repeated operation and overall cesarean section. [source] Teenage Pregnancy in the Texas PanhandleTHE JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, Issue 3 2005Rosa Galvez-Myles MD ABSTRACT: Purpose: This study compares rural and small-city teenage and adult pregnancies, with respect to complication rates and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: Chart review of Medicaid patients (513 teenage [under 20 years] and 174 adult controls [ages 25,34]) delivered (excluding multiple gestation) in Amarillo, Texas, from January 1999 to April 2001. Demographic data collected included maternal race, gravidity, parity, smoking status, drug usage, presence of antenatally diagnosed sexually transmitted disease(s), county type (rural vs small city) and number of prenatal visits. Outcomes included mode of delivery, primary cesarean section rates, preterm birth (<34 or <37 weeks), birth weight, birth weight <2,500 g, preeclampsia, total maternal weight gain, hemoglobin changes after delivery, Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Statistical comparisons between groups were made for a number of factors and outcomes (P<.05). Results: Teenagers did not have a significantly higher frequency of either illicit drug or tobacco usage, but teenagers ,17 years had a greater incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (19.8% vs 10.4%, P<008) and preeclampsia (7.1% vs 2.3%, P<.025, odds ratio 3.2 [1.1 to 9.9]) when compared with adults. The total weight gain was highest for teens ,17 years (36.4 pounds vs adults: 28.2, P<.001). The primary cesarean section rate was higher in adults (all teens 18.5% vs adults 38.6%, P<.001). County rurality had no impact on any of the observed findings or variables tested. Conclusions: Young teenagers have a higher incidence of sexually transmitted diseases and preeclampsia and also gain significantly more weight with pregnancy than young adults. However, the pregnancy outcomes were no different for rural vs small city teens. [source] Population-Based Study of Cesarean Section After In Vitro Fertilization in AustraliaBIRTH, Issue 3 2010Elizabeth A. Sullivan MBBS, FAFPHM Abstract:, Background:, Decisions about method of birth should be evidence based. In Australia, the rising rate of cesarean section has not been limited to births after spontaneous conception. This study aimed to investigate cesarean section among women giving birth after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods:, Retrospective population-based study was conducted using national registry data on IVF treatment. The study included 17,019 women who underwent IVF treatment during 2003 to 2005 and a national comparison population of women who gave birth in Australia. The outcome measure was cesarean section. Results:, Crude rate of cesarean section was 50.1 percent versus 28.9 percent for all other births. Single embryo transfer was associated with the lowest (40.7%) rate of cesarean section. Donor status and twin gestation were associated with significantly higher rates of cesarean section (autologous, 49.0% vs donor, 74.9%; AOR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.80, 2.69) and (singleton, 45.0% vs twin gestations, 75.7%; AOR: 3.81, 95% CI: 3.46, 4.20). The gestation-specific rate (60.1%) of cesarean section peaked at 38 weeks for singleton term pregnancies. Compared with other women, cesarean section rates for assisted reproductive technology term singletons (27.8% vs 43.8%, OR: 2.02 [95% CI: 1.95,2.10]) and twins (62.0% vs 75.7%, OR: 1.92 [95% CI: 1.74,2.11]) were significantly higher. Conclusions:, Rates for cesarean section appear to be disproportionately high in term singleton births after assisted reproductive technology. Vaginal birth should be supported and the indications for cesarean section evidence based. (BIRTH 37:3 September 2010) [source] Evidence-Based Strategies for Reducing Cesarean Section Rates: A Meta-AnalysisBIRTH, Issue 1 2007Nils Chaillet PhD ABSTRACT: Background: Canada's cesarean section rate reached an all-time high of 22.5 percent of in-hospital deliveries in 2002 and was associated with potential maternal and neonatal complications. Clinical practice guidelines represent an appropriate mean for reducing cesarean section rates. The challenge now lies in implementing these guidelines. Objectives of this meta-analysis were to assess the effectiveness of interventions for reducing the cesarean section rate and to assess the impact of this reduction on maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Methods: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were consulted from January 1990 to June 2005. Additional studies were identified by screening reference lists from identified studies and expert suggestions. Studies involving rigorous evaluation of a strategy for reducing overall cesarean section rates were identified. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series studies were evaluated according to Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group criteria. Results: Among the 10 included studies, a significant reduction of cesarean section rate was found by random meta-analysis (pooled RR = 0.81 [0.75, 0.87]). No evidence of publication bias was identified. Audit and feedback (pooled RR = 0.87 [0.81, 0.93]), quality improvement (pooled RR = 0.74 [0.70, 0.77]), and multifaceted strategies (pooled RR=0.73 [0.68, 0.79]) were effective for reducing the cesarean section rate. However, quality improvement based on active management of labor showed mixed effects. Design of studies showed a higher effect for noncontrolled studies than for controlled studies (pooled RR = 0.76 [0.72, 0.81] vs 0.92 [0.88, 0.96]). Studies including an identification of barriers to change were more effective than other interventions for reducing the cesarean section rate (pooled RR = 0.74 [0.71, 0.78] vs 0.88 [0.82, 0.94]). Among included studies, no significant differences were found for perinatal and neonatal mortality and perinatal and maternal morbidity with respect to the mode of delivery. Only 1 study showed a significant reduction of neonatal and perinatal mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The cesarean section rate can be safely reduced by interventions that involve health workers in analyzing and modifying their practice. Our results suggest that multifaceted strategies, based on audit and detailed feedback, are advised to improve clinical practice and effectively reduce cesarean section rates. Moreover, these findings support the assumption that identification of barriers to change is a major key to success. (BIRTH 34:1 March 2007) [source] Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological StudyBIRTH, Issue 4 2006Fernando Althabe MD ABSTRACT: Background: Cesarean section rates show a wide variation among countries in the world, ranging from 0.4 to 40 percent, and a continuous rise in the trend has been observed in the past 30 years. Our aim was to explore the association of cesarean section rates of different countries with their maternal and neonatal mortality and to test the hypothesis that in low-income countries, increasing cesarean section rates were associated with reductions in both outcomes, whereas in high-income countries, such association did not exist. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional multigroup ecological study using data from 119 countries from 1991 to 2003. These countries were classified into 3 categories: low-income (59 countries), medium-income (31 countries), and high-income (29 countries) countries according to an international classification. We assessed the ecological association between national cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality by fitting multiple linear regression models. Results: Median cesarean section rates were lower in low-income than in medium- and high-income countries. Seventy-six percent of the low-income countries, 16 percent of the medium-income countries, and 3 percent of high-income countries showed cesarean section rates between 0 and 10 percent. Three percent of low-income countries, 36 percent of medium-income countries, and 31 percent of high-income countries showed cesarean section rates above 20 percent. In low-income countries, a negative and statistically significant linear correlation was observed between cesarean section rates and neonatal mortality and between cesarean section rates and maternal mortality. No association was observed in medium- and high-income countries for either neonatal mortality or maternal mortality. Conclusions: No association between cesarean section rates and maternal or neonatal mortality was shown in medium- and high-income countries. Thus, it becomes relevant for future good-quality research to assess the effect of the high figures of cesarean section rates on maternal and neonatal morbidity. For low-income countries, and on confirmation by further research, making cesarean section available for high-risk pregnancies could contribute to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, whereas a system of care with cesarean section rates below 10 percent would be unlikely to cover their needs. (BIRTH 33:4 December 2006) [source] |