|
| ||
|
|
||
Cephalic Version (cephalic + version)
Kinds of Cephalic Version Selected AbstractsEpidemic of Cesarean Section at the General, Private and University Hospitals in ThailandJOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 5 2000Dr. Boonsri Chanrachakul Abstract Objective: To undertake a survey of cesarean section in the general, private and university hospitals in Thailand. Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent to all the general, private and university hospitals with 200 beds or more. The questionnaires were prepared to find out the percentage, the indications and the trend of cesarean delivery, the measures taken to decrease cesarean section rate, and the practice of external cephalic version (ECV) and vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) in the hospitals. Results: The overall response rate was 88%. Mean cesarean section rates were 24, 48, and 22% in the general, private and university hospitals, respectively. Cesarean section rates in most of the hospitals were increased in the past 5 years namely 78% in the general hospitals, 50% in the private hospitals, 66% in the university hospitals. However, only 38% of the hospitals had measures to regulate this operation. Repeated cesarean section was the most common indication in the private (63%) and the university hospitals (88%) while failure to progress was the most common indication in the general hospitals (55%). ECV and VBAC were performed in 26 and 12% of the hospitals. They were, however, not the standard practices. Conclusion: Rising of cesarean section rate without any measure to regulate it is the problem in the developing countries. Standardised labor management and reduction of unnecessary primary cesarean section will automatically reduce repeated operation and overall cesarean section. [source] Term breech singletons and caesarean section: A population study, Australia 1991,2005AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 5 2009Elizabeth Anne SULLIVAN Objective: To describe the method of birth of term breech singletons in Australia. Design, setting and participants: A retrospective population-based study of women who gave birth to term breech singletons in Australia between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2005 using data from the National Perinatal Data Collection. Main outcome measures: Caesarean section, vaginal breech birth. Results:, Method of birth changed for term breech singletons from 1991 (vaginal breech birth 23.1% versus caesarean (no labour 55.6%, labour 21.2%)) to 2005 (vaginal breech birth 3.7% versus caesarean (no labour 76.6%, labour 19.7%)). Overall, the population attributable risk percentage of term breech singletons for all caesarean sections declined from 10.2% in 1991 to 6.9% in 2005. Conclusion:, Planned caesarean section is the standard method of birth for term breech singletons in Australia. Active measures including external cephalic version should be supported to reduce the rate of caesarean section where clinically indicated. Retention of a skilled clinical workforce is essential in the provision of the latter and to assist the minority of women having vaginal breech births. Breech presentation is not a major factor in the overall rise in caesarean section experienced by Australia since 1996. [source] A survey of pregnant women's attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic versionAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 3 2000Tak Yeung Leung SUMMARY A structured interview survey was carried out in 150 women who came for their first antenatal visit in a university hospital in Hong Kong between June and July 1998. Their opinions and perceptions of fetal and maternal safeties on different modes of delivery for both cephalic and breech presentation, and external cephalic version (ECV) were surveyed. Their decisions on the management of term breech-presenting pregnancy were examined. Most women (92%) preferred vaginal delivery to Caesarean delivery (CS) in case of cephalic presentation, mainly because it was a natural way of parturition. They perceived that vaginal delivery was safer than CS for both mothers and babies, but the reverse was true for breech presentation. About 82% chose ECV as the first choice of managing breech presentation, mainly because a successful version allowed a natural way of delivery. Only 2% of women considered ECV ineffective, and 13.3% and 18.7% considered it not safe for mothers and fetuses respectively. Therefore, ECV should be an available option in all obstetric units. Adequate counselling and explanation would improve the acceptance of ECV. [source] Oral nifepidine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version: a double-blind randomised trialBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 1 2009R Collaris Objective, To evaluate oral nifedipine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version (ECV). Design, A double-blind randomised trial. Setting, A university hospital in Malaysia. Population, Non-labouring women with a term singleton fetus in breech presentation or transverse lie suitable for elective ECV. Methods, Participants were randomised to either 10 mg oral nifedipine tablet and subcutaneous saline placebo or oral placebo tablet and 250 microgram bolus terbutaline subcutaneously. Participants and providers were blinded. Ultrasound assessment and cardiotocogram were performed prior to ECV. ECV was commenced 20,30 minutes after treatment. A maximum of two ECV attempts were permitted. Elective caesarean delivery or a repeat ECV attempt at a later date was offered to participants following failed ECV. After successful ECV, management was expectant. Main outcome measures, Primary outcomes were successful ECV (cephalic presentation immediately after ECV) and caesarean delivery. Results, Ninety women were randomised: 44 to nifedipine and 46 to terbutaline. Initial ECV success rate was 15/44 (34.1%) versus 24/46 (52.2%) (relative risk [RR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.4,1.1; P= 0.094), and caesarean delivery rate was 34/44 (77.3%) versus 26/46 (56.5%) (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.01,1.85; numbers needed to treat to benefit 5, 95% CI 2.5,55; P= 0.046) for nifedipine and terbutaline groups, respectively. Neonatal outcome was not different. Conclusions, Bolus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for ECV compared with oral nifedipine resulted in less caesarean deliveries. ECV success rate was not significantly higher. Larger studies are indicated. [source] Cluster randomised trial of an active, multifaceted educational intervention based on the WHO Reproductive Health Library to improve obstetric practicesBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 1 2007AM Gülmezoglu Objective, We conducted a trial to evaluate the effect of an active, multifaceted educational strategy to promote the use of the WHO Reproductive Health Library (RHL) on obstetric practices. Design, Cluster randomised trial. The trial was assigned the International Standardised Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN14055385. Settings, Twenty-two hospitals in Mexico City and 18 in the Northeast region of Thailand. Methods, The intervention consisted primarily of three interactive workshops using RHL over a period of 6 months. The focus of the workshops was to provide access to knowledge and enable its use. A computer and support for using both the computer and RHL were provided at each hospital. The control hospitals did not receive any intervention. Main outcome measures, The main outcome measures were changes in ten selected clinical practices as recommended in RHL starting approximately four to six months after the third workshop. Clinical practice data were collected at each hospital from 1000 consecutively delivered women or for a 6-month period whichever was reached sooner. Results, The active, multifaceted educational intervention we employed did not affect the ten targeted practices in a consistent and substantive way. Iron/folate supplementation, uterotonic use after birth and breastfeeding on demand were already frequently practiced, and we were unable to measure external cephalic version. Of the remaining six practices, selective, as opposed to routine episiotomy policy increased in the intervention group (difference in adjusted mean rate = 5.3%; 95% CI ,0.1 to 10.7%) in Thailand, and there was a trend towards an increased use of antibiotics at caesarean section in Mexico (difference in adjusted mean rate = 19.0%; 95% CI: ,8.0 to 46.0%). There were no differences in the use of labour companionship, magnesium sulphate use for eclampsia, corticosteroids for women delivering before 34 weeks and vacuum extraction. RHL awareness (24.8,65.5% in Mexico and 33.9,83.3% in Thailand) and use (4.8,34.9% in Mexico and 15.5,76.4% in Thailand) increased substantially after the intervention in both countries. Conclusion, The multifaceted, active strategy to provide health workers with the knowledge and skills to use RHL to improve their practice led to increased access to and use of RHL, however, no consistent or substantive changes in clinical practices were detected within 4,6 months after the third workshop. [source] Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trialBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 5 2005Lawrence Impey Background External cephalic version (ECV) reduces the incidence of breech presentation at term and caesarean section for non-cephalic births. Tocolytics may improve success rates, but are time consuming, may cause side effects and have not been proven to alter caesarean section rates. The aim of this trial was to determine whether tocolysis should be used if ECV is being re-attempted after a failed attempt. Objective To determine whether tocolysis should be used if ECV is being re-attempted after a failed attempt. Design Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Setting UK teaching hospital. Population One hundred and twenty-four women with a breech presentation at term who had undergone an unsuccessful attempt at ECV. Methods Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for categorical variables and a t test for continuous variables. Analysis was by intention to treat. Main outcome measures Incidence of cephalic presentation at delivery. Secondary outcomes were caesarean section and measures of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Results The use of tocolysis for a repeat attempt at ECV significantly increases the incidence of cephalic presentation at delivery (RR 3.21; 95% CI 1.23,8.39) and reduces the incidence of caesarean section (RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.14,0.80). The effects were most marked in multiparous women (RR for cephalic presentation at delivery 9.38; 95% CI 1.64,53.62). Maternal and neonatal morbidity remain unchanged. Conclusions The use of tocolysis increases the success rate of repeat ECV and reduces the incidence of caesarean section. A policy of only using tocolysis where an initial attempt has failed leads to a relatively high success rate with minimum usage of tocolysis. [source] External cephalic version induced fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow changes are related to the amount of pressure exertedBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 5 2004Tak Yeung Leung Objective To correlate the applied pressure during external cephalic version with the changes in fetal middle cerebral arterial and umbilical arterial flow before and after the procedure. Design A prospective observational study over a two-year period. Setting External cephalic version was performed in a university hospital. Population Sixty-nine women with singleton breech-presenting pregnancy at or above 36 weeks of gestation undergoing external cephalic version. Methods During external cephalic version, the operator wore a pair of pressure-sensing gloves which had thin piezo-resistive sensors positioned on the palmar surface. During each version procedure, real-time pressure readings were recorded from all sensors, and then analysed with a computer program. The amount of pressure applied over time was presented by pressure,time integral. The pulsatility indices of both fetal middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery before and after external cephalic version were measured. The changes of pulsatility indices of both middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery were presented as a ratio of the post-external cephalic version pulsatility indices to pre-external cephalic version pulsatility indices, denoted by middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio and umbilical artery pulsatility index ratio, respectively. The statistical correlation between pressure,time integral and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio and umbilical artery pulsatility index ratio are analysed using Pearson's correlation test. Main outcome measures Changes in pulsatility indices of fetal middle cerebral and umbilical arteries and fetal heart rate after external cephalic version. Results The overall success rate of external cephalic version was 77%. There was a significant negative correlation between pressure,time integral and both middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio (P= 0.001) and umbilical artery pulsatility index ratio (P= 0.012). When women were categorised according to placental site, pressure,time integral was negatively correlated with middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio only when the placenta was posteriorly located (P= 0.003), and with umbilical artery pulsatility index ratio only when the placenta was laterally located (P= 0.03). Conclusions The greater the force applied during external cephalic version, the greater the reduction in pulsatility indices of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery, indicating an increase in blood flow through these arteries. The increase in cerebral blood flow after external cephalic version is more prominent when the placenta is lying posteriorly, while the increase in umbilical flow is more prominent when the placenta is lying laterally. These findings suggest that the vascular changes probably represent a direct effect of force exerted on the fetal head and the placenta. [source] High incidence of obstetric interventions after successful external cephalic versionBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 6 2002Louis Yik-Si Chan Objective To investigate the delivery outcome after successful external cephalic version (ECV). Design Case,control study. Setting University teaching hospital. Population The study group consisted of 279 consecutive singleton deliveries at term over a six-year period, all of which had had successful ECV performed. The control group included 28,447 singleton term deliveries during the same six-year period. Methods Between group differences were compared with the Mann,Whitney U test or Student's t test where appropriate. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for categorical variables. Main outcome measures Incidence of and indications for obstetric interventions. Results The risk of instrumental delivery and emergency caesarean section was higher in the ECV group (14.3%vs 12.8%; OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0,2.0, and 23.3%vs 9.4%; OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.3,4.1, respectively). The higher caesarean rate was due to an increase in all major indications, namely, suspected fetal distress, failure to progress in labour and failed induction. The higher incidence of instrumental delivery was mainly due to an increase in prolonged second stage. The odds ratio for operative delivery remained significant after controlling for potential confounding variables. There were also significantly greater frequencies of labour induction (24.0%vs 13.4%; OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.5,2.7) and use of epidural analgesia (20.4%vs 12.4%; OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4,2.4) by women in the ECV group. The higher induction rate is mainly due to induction for post term, abnormal cardiotocography (CTG) and antepartum haemorrhage (APH) of unknown origin. Conclusion The incidence of operative delivery and other obstetric interventions are higher in pregnancies after successful ECV. Women undergoing ECV should be informed about this higher risk of interventions. [source] | ||||||||||