|
| ||
|
|
||
Care Bundle (care + bundle)
Selected AbstractsThe Surviving Sepsis Campaign and Sepsis Care Bundles: substance or sophistry?ANAESTHESIA, Issue 4 2006S. J. Fletcher No abstract is available for this article. [source] Implementing the severe sepsis care bundles outside the ICU by outreachNURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, Issue 5 2007Chris Carter Abstract Sepsis is not a new challenge facing the health care team, it remains a complex disease, which is difficult to identify and treat. Mortality from sepsis remains high and continues to be a common cause of death among critically ill patients, despite advances in critical care. Sepsis accounts for an estimated 27% of all intensive care admissions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and accounted for 46% of all intensive care bed days. Recent research studies and the surviving sepsis campaign have shown that identifying and providing key interventions to patients with severe sepsis and septic shock prior to their admission to the intensive care unit significantly improve outcomes. The aim of this paper was to identify how the Critical Care Outreach Team at one local hospital implemented the severe sepsis resuscitation care bundle for patients in the emergency department (ED) and on the general wards. It will include a presentation on the various ways the team raised the profile of severe sepsis and the care bundle at hospital and at national level. It also includes audit data that have been collected. The results showed that if the resuscitation care bundle was implemented within the first 24 h of hospital admission, mortality was 29%, whereas if the care bundle was instigated after this time mortality was more than at 49%. Audit data showed that the commonest sign of severe sepsis seen in patients in the ED and on wards was tachypnoea. This article discusses the successful implementation of the severe sepsis resuscitation care bundle and the positive impact an Outreach team can have in changing practice in the way patients are managed with severe sepsis. The audit data support the need for regular physiological observations and the use of a Patient At Risk Trigger scoring tool to identify patients at risk of deterioration. This allows referral to the Outreach team, who assess the patient and if appropriate initiate the care bundle. [source] Idealized design of perinatal careJOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE RISK MANAGEMENT, Issue S1 2006Faith McLellan PhD Idealized Design of Perinatal Care is an innovation project based on the principles of reliability science and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI's) model for applying these principles to improve care.1 The project builds upon similar processes developed for other clinical arenas in three previous IHI Idealized Design projects. The Idealized Design model focuses on comprehensive redesign to enable a care system to perform substantially better in the future than the best it can do at present. The goal of Idealized Design of Perinatal Care is to achieve a new level of safer, more effective care and to minimize some of the risks identified in medical malpractice cases. The model described in this white paper, Idealized Design of Perinatal Care, represents the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's best current assessment of the components of the safest and most reliable system of perinatal care. The four key components of the model are: 1) the development of reliable clinical processes to manage labor and delivery; 2) the use of principles that improve safety (i.e., preventing, detecting, and mitigating errors); 3) the establishment of prepared and activated care teams that communicate effectively with each other and with mothers and families; and 4) a focus on mother and family as the locus of control during labor and delivery. Reviews of perinatal care have consistently pointed to failures of communication among the care team and documentation of care as common factors in adverse events that occur in labor and delivery. They are also prime factors leading to malpractice claims.2 Two perinatal care "bundles", a group of evidence-based interventions related to a disease or care process that, when executed together, result in better outcomes than when implemented individually , are being tested in this Idealized Design project: the Elective Induction Bundle and the Augmentation Bundle. Experience from the use of bundles in other clinical areas, such as care of the ventilated patient, has shown that reliably applying these evidence-based interventions can dramatically improve outcomes.3 The assumption of this innovation work is that the use of bundles in the delivery of perinatal care will have a similar effect. The authors acknowledge that other organizations have also been working on improving perinatal care through the use of simulation training and teamwork and communication training. IHI's model includes elements of these methods. The Idealized Design of Perinatal Care project has two phases. Sixteen perinatal units from hospitals around the US participated in Phase I, from February to August 2005. The goals of Phase I were identifying changes that would make the most impact on improving perinatal care, selecting elements for each of the bundles, learning how to apply IHI's reliability model to improve processes, and improving the culture within a perinatal unit. This white paper provides detail about the Idealized Design process and examines some of the initial work completed by teams. Phase II, which began in September 2005, expands on this work. This phase focuses particularly on managing second stage labor, including common interpretation of fetal heart monitoring, developing a reliable tool to identify harm, and ensuring that patient preferences are known and honored. [source] Implementing the severe sepsis care bundles outside the ICU by outreachNURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, Issue 5 2007Chris Carter Abstract Sepsis is not a new challenge facing the health care team, it remains a complex disease, which is difficult to identify and treat. Mortality from sepsis remains high and continues to be a common cause of death among critically ill patients, despite advances in critical care. Sepsis accounts for an estimated 27% of all intensive care admissions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and accounted for 46% of all intensive care bed days. Recent research studies and the surviving sepsis campaign have shown that identifying and providing key interventions to patients with severe sepsis and septic shock prior to their admission to the intensive care unit significantly improve outcomes. The aim of this paper was to identify how the Critical Care Outreach Team at one local hospital implemented the severe sepsis resuscitation care bundle for patients in the emergency department (ED) and on the general wards. It will include a presentation on the various ways the team raised the profile of severe sepsis and the care bundle at hospital and at national level. It also includes audit data that have been collected. The results showed that if the resuscitation care bundle was implemented within the first 24 h of hospital admission, mortality was 29%, whereas if the care bundle was instigated after this time mortality was more than at 49%. Audit data showed that the commonest sign of severe sepsis seen in patients in the ED and on wards was tachypnoea. This article discusses the successful implementation of the severe sepsis resuscitation care bundle and the positive impact an Outreach team can have in changing practice in the way patients are managed with severe sepsis. The audit data support the need for regular physiological observations and the use of a Patient At Risk Trigger scoring tool to identify patients at risk of deterioration. This allows referral to the Outreach team, who assess the patient and if appropriate initiate the care bundle. [source] | ||||||||||