| |||
Carotid Angioplasty (carotid + angioplasty)
Selected AbstractsCOMMON FACIAL VEIN: AN ALTERNATIVE PATCH MATERIAL IN CAROTID ANGIOPLASTYANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2008Abeywardana M. S. Abeysekara Patch angioplasty is a popular adjunct to carotid endarterectomy to facilitate arteriotomy closure. The long saphenous vein is the common autogenous patch in use. We tested the feasibility of using the ipsilateral common facial vein (CFV), which is usually sacrificed during exposure of the carotid bifurcation. A consecutive series of 17 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy was examined to show the use of CFV patch in arteriotomy closure in 18 procedures. During exposure of the carotid bifurcation, the facial vein was harvested and distended with heparinized saline to assess the size of the vein. If the vein had an adequate diameter, it was everted and used as a double-layered patch. Patients were followed up postoperatively with serial duplex scanning at 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. The median (range) age of the patients in the series was 66 years (52,72 years). Of the 18 CFV harvested, 2 were rejected because of small calibre. The median (range) length of the vein harvested was 5 cm (4,6 cm). The average diameter of harvested vein was 5 mm. The median (range) time taken for harvesting, distending and everting the vein was 10 min (8,12 min). There were no perioperative deaths or strokes. There was no significant re-stenosis during the follow up of 24 months (18,36 months), with a mean peak velocity of 0.86 m/s (0.58,1.29 ). The use of everted CFV patch in carotid angioplasty is safe, quick, convenient and durable, whereas saphenous veins are spared and lower limb incisions avoided. [source] New distal embolic protection device the FiberNet® 3 dimensional filter: First carotid human studyCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 7 2007Michel Henry Abstract Objective: Evaluate the performance and safety of the FiberNet® Embolic Protection System during carotid artery intervention. Background: Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting (CAS) can be proposed to treat the majority of carotid stenoses. Brain embolization takes place and routine use of Embolic Protection Devices (EPD) is warranted. Many EPDs have significant limitations, which may be addressed by a new EPD, the FiberNet® (Lumen Biomedical, Plymouth, MN). Methods: The system consists of a 3-dimensional expandable filter made of fibers, which expand radially, mounted onto a 0.014, wire and retrieval catheter. FiberNet can capture particles as small as 40 ,m without compromising flow. Results: 35 lesions treated in 34 patients. Male 67.6%. Age: 71.4 ± 8.8 (50,85). Average stenosis 84.5% ± 7.9 (70,99). 29.4% were symptomatic. Technical success: 34/35 (97%). No stroke or death within 30 days. Neurological events: two permanent amaurosis, one amaurosis fugax. All samples visually contained significant amounts of emboli. The mean surface area of debris caught was 63.8 mm2 (37.7,107.5). Comparisons were made with other EPDs. The mean surface area of debris caught was 12.2 mm2 (2.7,34.3). No changes were noted in CT/MRI at 30-day post procedure. Conclusion: The first human use of this new novel EPD in carotid artery stenting is encouraging. The FiberNet was easy to use and confirmed the ability to capture particles less than 100 ,m. The feasibility of the FiberNet has been demonstrated. Additional patients will demonstrate the overall safety and efficacy of this new EPD device. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Carotid redo surgery: both safe and durableANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 12 2003Richard A. Harris Aim: To examine the outcomes and complications of surgery for recurrent carotid stenosis. Methods: From 1974 to 2000, 1922 carotid endarterectomies were performed in our unit. A retrospective cohort analysis of these records identified 24 patients (1.2%) who underwent surgery for recurrent stenosis. Results: There were 13 men and 11 women in the group. Median follow up was 7.2 years (interquartile range 4.4,12.4 years). The indication for redo surgery was either symptomatic severe (80,99%) or moderate (50,79%) restenosis, or severe asymptomatic (80,99%) restenosis. Repair was performed by patch angioplasty (88%), endarterectomy alone (8%) or interposition grafting (4%). Within the 30 day perioperative period there were no deaths, no strokes (major or minor), or significant cardiac morbidity. One patient (4%) developed a permanent spinal accessory nerve deficit. Another patient (4%) required further re-intervention for recurrent disease. Conclusions: Very low surgical morbidity and mortality was achieved in our unit by implementing a policy of selective re-intervention for carotid restenosis. Redo carotid endarterectomy can therefore be recommended as having no greater morbidity than primary carotid endarterectomy. Carotid angioplasty and stenting are not recommended as a routine alternative treatment. [source] Carotid angioplasty and stenting in octogenarians: Is it safe?CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2008M. Henry MD Abstract Purpose: Elderly patients have a higher risk of complications in carotid endarterectomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed in octogenarians also increases the procedure related risk. Methods: 870 patients (male 626) mean age 70.9 ± 9.3 years underwent 930 CAS for de novo lesions (n = 851) restenoses (n = 54) post radiation (n = 14) inflammatory arteritis (n = 9) post trauma aneurysms (n = 2). Indications for treatment: symptomatic carotid stenosis , 70% (n = 577) or asymptomatic stenosis , 80%. Patients were separated into two age groups: <80 years (749 patients, 806 CAS) and >80 years (121 patients, 124 CAS). 187 CAS performed without protection (N.P,) 6 patients >80 years, 743 with protection (NP+) (occlusion balloon: 334, filters: 404, reversal flow: 6) 118 patients >80 years. Data analysis included neurological complications, death and myocardial infarction (MI) rate at 30 days, anatomical particularities. Technical points will be described depending on the age of the patient. Results: Technical success 804/806 in patients <80 years, 123/124 in patients >80 years (NS). 30 days outcomes: in the patient group <80 years we observed 9 TIA (1.1%) 3 without NP (1.7%) 6 with NP (0.9%), 5 minor strokes (0.6%) 2 without NP (1.1%) 3 with NP (0.5%), 3 major strokes: 2 without NP (1.1%) 1 with NP (0.2%), 5 deaths (0.6%) 2 without NP (1.1%) 3 with NP (0.5%). Death/stroke/MI: 14 (1.8%) 6 without NP (3.3%), 8 with NP (1.3%). In the group >80 years, we observed 2 TIA (1.7%) 1 without NP 1 with NP (0.92%) 1 minor stroke without NP (17%) no major stroke, no death. Death/stroke/MI 1 without NP (17%). Conclusion: CAS can be performed in elderly patients without higher risk than in younger patients. But good indications, a meticulous technique, protection devices are mandatory and some technical points must be pointed out to avoid neurological complications and failures. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Flow-Reversal Device for Cerebral Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting,Acute and Long-Term ResultsJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2006KASJA RABE M.D. Objective: Several types of cerebral (embolic) protection devices have been used in patients undergoing carotid stenting. This study assessed results achieved with a flow-reversal system. Method: Carotid stenting was performed in 56 patients (mean age, 68 ± 9 years). The mean percentage of stenosis was 77%± 10%. During the procedure, cerebral protection was achieved by means of balloon occlusion of the common and external carotid artery with use of a Parodi Anti-Emboli System. The patients' neurologic status was assessed during the intervention; at discharge; 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure; and yearly thereafter. Results: The procedure was technically successful in all cases. One patient had a minor stroke 6 hours after the intervention. No major strokes, deaths, or myocardial infarctions occurred. During long-term follow-up (to 40 months), 2 patients died of a secondary complication after intracerebral bleeding and stroke and 1 died as a result of ventricular fibrillation. Restenosis did not exceed 50% of vessel diameter in any patient. Conclusions: The acute results indicate that proximal occlusion and flow reversal for cerebral protection during carotid stenting is a safe and effective method. The low restenosis and complication rate during long-term follow-up is in accordance with other series of carotid angioplasty and shows that the occlusion balloons do not cause any long-term side effects. [source] COMMON FACIAL VEIN: AN ALTERNATIVE PATCH MATERIAL IN CAROTID ANGIOPLASTYANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2008Abeywardana M. S. Abeysekara Patch angioplasty is a popular adjunct to carotid endarterectomy to facilitate arteriotomy closure. The long saphenous vein is the common autogenous patch in use. We tested the feasibility of using the ipsilateral common facial vein (CFV), which is usually sacrificed during exposure of the carotid bifurcation. A consecutive series of 17 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy was examined to show the use of CFV patch in arteriotomy closure in 18 procedures. During exposure of the carotid bifurcation, the facial vein was harvested and distended with heparinized saline to assess the size of the vein. If the vein had an adequate diameter, it was everted and used as a double-layered patch. Patients were followed up postoperatively with serial duplex scanning at 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. The median (range) age of the patients in the series was 66 years (52,72 years). Of the 18 CFV harvested, 2 were rejected because of small calibre. The median (range) length of the vein harvested was 5 cm (4,6 cm). The average diameter of harvested vein was 5 mm. The median (range) time taken for harvesting, distending and everting the vein was 10 min (8,12 min). There were no perioperative deaths or strokes. There was no significant re-stenosis during the follow up of 24 months (18,36 months), with a mean peak velocity of 0.86 m/s (0.58,1.29 ). The use of everted CFV patch in carotid angioplasty is safe, quick, convenient and durable, whereas saphenous veins are spared and lower limb incisions avoided. [source] |