|
| ||
|
|
||
CA Regions (ca + regions)
Selected AbstractsEffect of corticosterone on developing hippocampus: Short-term and long-term outcomesHIPPOCAMPUS, Issue 4 2009Wen-Bin He Abstract Many documents implicate that corticosterone plays a negative role in brain function, especially in learning and memory. However, less evidence confirms its direct actions on hippocampal development. In the work reported here, pro treatment, minimum corticosterone administration in infant mice, and con treatment, corticosterone deprivation by adrenalectomy, were used to examine the effects imposed by corticosterone on the structure and function of developing hippocampus. Our study shows that adrenalectomy induces decrease of plasma corticosterone levels and results in the impairment of learning performance and the degenerative changes not in CA regions of hippocampus but in dentate gyrus. Noteworthily, this damage effect is severer in 5-week-old mice than that in 10-week-old mice. In addition, the short-term effect of minimum corticosterone administration may accelerate the development of dentate gyrus of 10-day-old mice. Moreover, minimum corticosterone administration during infancy contributed to the learning performance and the structural integrity of hippocampal CA regions in different developing stages, while this phenomenon was not observed in dentate gyrus. In conclusion, corticosterone is necessary for the development of dentate gyrus, especially in relatively young individuals, and administration with minimum corticosterone in infancy has a long-term positive influence on the hippocampal structure and function in different developing stages. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Spatial memory and the monkey hippocampus: Not all space is created equalHIPPOCAMPUS, Issue 1 2009Pamela Banta Lavenex Abstract Studies of the role of the monkey hippocampus in spatial learning and memory, however few, have reliably produced inconsistent results. Whereas the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning and memory has been clearly established in rodents, studies in nonhuman primates have made a variety of claims that range from the involvement of the hippocampus in spatial memory only at relatively longer memory delays, to no role for the hippocampus in spatial memory at all. In contrast, we have shown that selective damage restricted to the hippocampus (CA regions) prevents the learning or use of allocentric, spatial relational representations of the environment in freely behaving adult monkeys tested in an open-field arena. In this commentary, we discuss a unifying framework that explains these apparently discrepant results regarding the role of the monkey hippocampus in spatial learning and memory. We describe clear and strict criteria to interpret the findings from previous studies and guide future investigations of spatial memory in monkeys. Specifically, we affirm that, as in the rodent, the primate hippocampus is critical for spatial relational learning and memory, and in a time-independent manner. We describe how claims to the contrary are the result of experimental designs that fail to recognize, and control for, egocentric (hippocampus-independent) and allocentric (hippocampus-dependent) spatial frames of reference. Finally, we conclude that the available data demonstrate unequivocally that the central role of the hippocampus in allocentric, spatial relational learning and memory is conserved among vertebrates, including nonhuman primates. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Detection and localization of an estrogen receptor beta splice variant protein (ER,2) in the adult female rat forebrain and midbrain regionsTHE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, Issue 3 2007Wilson C.J. Chung Abstract Estrogens regulate neural processes such as neuronal development, reproductive behavior, and hormone secretion, and signal through estrogen receptor (ER) , and ER, (here called ER,1). Recent studies have found variations in ER, and ER,1 mRNA splicing in rodents and humans. Functional reporter gene assays suggest that these splicing variations alter ER-mediated transcriptional regulation. Estrogen receptor beta 2 (ER,2), an ER,1 splice variant containing an 18 amino acid (AA) insert in the ligand binding domain, binds estradiol with ,10-fold lower affinity than ER,1, suggesting that it may serve as a low-affinity ER. Moreover, ER,2 reportedly acts in a dominant-negative fashion when heterodimerized with ER,1 or ER,. To explore the function of ER,2 in brain, an antiserum (Two,ER.1) targeting the 18 AA insert was developed and characterized. Western blot analysis and transient expression of ER,2 in cell lines demonstrated that Two,ER.1 recognizes ER,2. In the adult female rat brain, ER,2 immunoreactivity is localized in the cell nucleus and is expressed with a distribution similar to that of ER,1 mRNA. ER,2 immunoreactive cell numbers were high in, for example, piriform cortex, paraventricular nucleus, supraoptic nucleus, arcuate nucleus, and hippocampal CA regions, whereas it was low in the dentate gyrus. Moreover, ER,2 is coexpressed in gonadotropin-releasing hormone and oxytocin neurons. These studies demonstrate ER, splice variant proteins in brain and support the hypothesis that ER signaling diversity depends not only on ligand or coregulatory proteins, but also on regional and phenotypic selectivity of ER splice variant proteins. J. Comp. Neurol. 505:249,267, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||