| |||
Branchial Cleft Cyst (branchial + cleft_cyst)
Selected AbstractsPatent Piriform Sinus Fistula in a Third Branchial Cleft CystTHE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue S3 2010Deidra A. Blanks MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Work Type II First Branchial Cleft Cyst with External Auditory Canal DuplicationTHE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue S1 2009Sandy Mong BS No abstract is available for this article. [source] Image Cytometry DNA-Analysis of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology to Aid Cytomorphology in the Distinction of Branchial Cleft Cyst from Cystic Metastasis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 11 2004Sushma Nordemar MD Abstract Objective: Frequently, the distinction between branchial cleft cyst and cystic metastases from squamous cell carcinoma is difficult by cytomorphology. In a prospective study, we investigated the need for, and the value of, image cytometry DNA-analysis as a complement to cytologic evaluation of cystic lesions in the neck. Study Design: Image cytometry DNA-analysis was performed on the fine needle aspiration cytology smears from 50 patients, referred to our department, with a solitary cystic lesion in the lateral region of the neck. Methods: Smears from aspirates were Giemsa stained and cytologically evaluated. Ahrens image analysis was used for DNA analysis on smears stained with Schiff reagent, and lymphocytes were used as control cells. Epithelial cells with DNA values exceeding 5c were regarded as aneuploid, indicating malignancy. Results: Nine lesions were diagnosed as squamous cell cancer metastases cytologically. DNA analysis showed aneuploidy in all of them except one. Three of these lesions had earlier been diagnosed as branchial cleft cyst at the referring hospital. Eight lesions were cytologically inconclusive and four of them were revealed as cystic metastasis at histopathologic analysis, and DNA analysis showed aneuploidy in all but one, which could not be analyzed. Two of these lesions were also diagnosed as branchial cleft cysts at the referring hospital. All benign lesions were diploid. Nine lesions were thyroid and salivary gland lesions. Conclusion: Image cytometry DNA-analysis was shown to help in the distinction between benign and malignant cystic lesions. Thus, when conventional cytomorphology does not suffice, DNA-analysis is clearly a valuable supplement. [source] Techniques to Achieve Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Excision of Second Branchial Cleft CystsTHE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue S3 2010Benjamin C Paul MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Cystic lesions of the head and neck: cytohistological correlation in 63 casesCYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 3 2007P. Firat Objective:, To investigate the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of cystic masses of the head and neck (H&N), excluding thyroid lesions. Methods:, A total of 198 cases, 63 of whom had consequent surgical specimens, were retrieved from the files of two university hospitals and reviewed. Results:, FNAC correctly diagnosed 25 of 36 neoplasms with a cystic component. Five Warthin's tumours, two squamous cell carcinomas, two mucoepidermoid carcinomas and two schwannomas yielded non-representative aspirates. Four of the missed Warthin's tumours and two mucoepidermoid carcinomas which were misdiagnosed as benign cysts were aspirated by their clinician. One branchial cleft cyst was cytologically interpreted as highly suspicious for carcinoma. Conclusions:, Disparate entities may present with similar cytological findings in the H&N region. A detailed description of differential diagnosis should be given in the cytology report in suspicious cases. Repeated aspirations from different sites of the lesion may reduce the false-negative rate. [source] Image Cytometry DNA-Analysis of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology to Aid Cytomorphology in the Distinction of Branchial Cleft Cyst from Cystic Metastasis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 11 2004Sushma Nordemar MD Abstract Objective: Frequently, the distinction between branchial cleft cyst and cystic metastases from squamous cell carcinoma is difficult by cytomorphology. In a prospective study, we investigated the need for, and the value of, image cytometry DNA-analysis as a complement to cytologic evaluation of cystic lesions in the neck. Study Design: Image cytometry DNA-analysis was performed on the fine needle aspiration cytology smears from 50 patients, referred to our department, with a solitary cystic lesion in the lateral region of the neck. Methods: Smears from aspirates were Giemsa stained and cytologically evaluated. Ahrens image analysis was used for DNA analysis on smears stained with Schiff reagent, and lymphocytes were used as control cells. Epithelial cells with DNA values exceeding 5c were regarded as aneuploid, indicating malignancy. Results: Nine lesions were diagnosed as squamous cell cancer metastases cytologically. DNA analysis showed aneuploidy in all of them except one. Three of these lesions had earlier been diagnosed as branchial cleft cyst at the referring hospital. Eight lesions were cytologically inconclusive and four of them were revealed as cystic metastasis at histopathologic analysis, and DNA analysis showed aneuploidy in all but one, which could not be analyzed. Two of these lesions were also diagnosed as branchial cleft cysts at the referring hospital. All benign lesions were diploid. Nine lesions were thyroid and salivary gland lesions. Conclusion: Image cytometry DNA-analysis was shown to help in the distinction between benign and malignant cystic lesions. Thus, when conventional cytomorphology does not suffice, DNA-analysis is clearly a valuable supplement. [source] Diagnostic value of GLUT-1 immunoreactivity to distinguish benign from malignant cystic squamous lesions of the head and neck in fine-needle aspiration biopsy materialDIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 5 2004Michael F. Weiner M.D. Abstract The distinction of cystic squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) from benign cystic squamous lesions (BCSLs) of the head and neck can be problematic on fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) material, particularly when BCSLs display epithelial reactive atypia or when SCC is well differentiated. Glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1), a facilitative cell surface glucose transport protein, is aberrantly expressed in many cancers including oral and hypopharyngeal SCC. We evaluated the expression of GLUT-1 by immunochemistry on FNAB material to determine its value in distinguishing cystic SCC from BCSL of the head and neck. A 5-yr retrospective review of all head and neck cystic squamous lesions having FNAB specimens with cell block material, radiological studies, and histological confirmation was performed at our institution. Cell block material from 24 cystic squamous lesions, including 8 (33%) BCSL (7 branchial cleft cysts and 1 thyroglossal duct cyst[TDC]) and 16 (67%) metastatic SCCs with cystic/liquefactive degeneration, was retrieved and immunostained with anti-GLUT-1. GLUT-1 expression was considered positive when at least 10% of squamous cells exhibited distinct cell membrane reactivity. Positive GLUT-1 immunostaining was detected in all 16 SCCs and in none of the 8 BCSLs. In the carcinoma cases, the majority of malignant cells exhibited GLUT-1 reactivity; only a minor population of well-differentiated SCC cells displaying keratinization and arranged as squamous pearls did not express GLUT-1. GLUT-1 expression in cell block material can help to distinguish cystic SCCs from BCSLs of the head and neck. In conjunction with clinical and radiological correlation, GLUT-1 immunoreactivity can be an important diagnostic aid when the cytological findings are ambiguous. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2004;31:294,299. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Image Cytometry DNA-Analysis of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology to Aid Cytomorphology in the Distinction of Branchial Cleft Cyst from Cystic Metastasis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 11 2004Sushma Nordemar MD Abstract Objective: Frequently, the distinction between branchial cleft cyst and cystic metastases from squamous cell carcinoma is difficult by cytomorphology. In a prospective study, we investigated the need for, and the value of, image cytometry DNA-analysis as a complement to cytologic evaluation of cystic lesions in the neck. Study Design: Image cytometry DNA-analysis was performed on the fine needle aspiration cytology smears from 50 patients, referred to our department, with a solitary cystic lesion in the lateral region of the neck. Methods: Smears from aspirates were Giemsa stained and cytologically evaluated. Ahrens image analysis was used for DNA analysis on smears stained with Schiff reagent, and lymphocytes were used as control cells. Epithelial cells with DNA values exceeding 5c were regarded as aneuploid, indicating malignancy. Results: Nine lesions were diagnosed as squamous cell cancer metastases cytologically. DNA analysis showed aneuploidy in all of them except one. Three of these lesions had earlier been diagnosed as branchial cleft cyst at the referring hospital. Eight lesions were cytologically inconclusive and four of them were revealed as cystic metastasis at histopathologic analysis, and DNA analysis showed aneuploidy in all but one, which could not be analyzed. Two of these lesions were also diagnosed as branchial cleft cysts at the referring hospital. All benign lesions were diploid. Nine lesions were thyroid and salivary gland lesions. Conclusion: Image cytometry DNA-analysis was shown to help in the distinction between benign and malignant cystic lesions. Thus, when conventional cytomorphology does not suffice, DNA-analysis is clearly a valuable supplement. [source] |