|
| ||
|
|
||
Boosted Protease Inhibitor (boosted + protease_inhibitor)
Selected AbstractsBoosted protease inhibitors as a therapeutic option in the treatment of HIV-infected childrenHIV MEDICINE, Issue 9 2009JT Ramos Objective Paediatric HIV treatment must address various special considerations. Administration of pharmacokinetically enhanced protease inhibitors (PIs) can improve paediatric therapeutic outcomes. The objective of this study was to review the use of boosted PI regimens in children. Methods Systematic literature searches of published manuscripts and conference databases using generic drug names and specific keywords were performed to ensure thorough and balanced reporting of available data. Results Boosted PI regimens offer multiple options across a range of ages and are efficacious in naïve and experienced children; safety and tolerability are similar to those observed in adults. Novel boosted PI simplification approaches may foster adherence and diminish resistance. Conclusions Boosted PIs are key components of first- and second-line treatments in children. Identifying factors associated with the response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in children may ultimately permit individualized therapies. [source] PENTA 2009 guidelines for the use of antiretroviral therapy in paediatric HIV-1 infectionHIV MEDICINE, Issue 10 2009PENTA Steering Committee PENTA Guidelines aim to provide practical recommendations for treating children with HIV infection in Europe. Changes to guidance since 2004 have been informed by new evidence and by expectations of better outcomes following the ongoing success of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Participation in PENTA trials of simplifying treatment is encouraged. The main changes are in the following sections: ,When to start ART': Treatment is recommended for all infants, and at higher CD4 cell counts and percentages in older children, in line with changes to adult guidelines. The number of age bands has been reduced to simplify and harmonize with other paediatric guidelines. Greater emphasis is placed on CD4 cell count in children over 5 years, and guidance is provided where CD4% and CD4 criteria differ. ,What to start with': A three-drug regimen of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with either a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) remains the first choice combination. Lamivudine and abacavir are the NRTI backbone of choice for most children, based on long-term follow-up in the PENTA 5 trial. Stavudine is no longer recommended. Whether to start with an NNRTI or PI remains unclear, but PENPACT 1 trial results in 2009 may help to inform this. All PIs should be ritonavir boosted. Recommendations on use of resistance testing, therapeutic drug monitoring and HLA testing draw from data in adults and from European paediatric cohort studies. Recently updated US and WHO paediatric guidelines provide more detailed review of the evidence base. Differences between guidelines are highlighted and explained. [source] Superior virological response to boosted protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in an observational treatment programmeHIV MEDICINE, Issue 2 2007E Wood Background The use of boosted protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy has become increasingly recommended in international HIV treatment consensus guidelines based on the results of randomized clinical trials. However, the impact of this new treatment strategy has not yet been evaluated in community-treated cohorts. Methods We evaluated baseline characteristics and plasma HIV RNA responses to unboosted and boosted PI-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients in British Columbia, Canada who initiated HAART between August 1997 and September 2003 and who were followed until September 2004. We evaluated time to HIV-1 RNA suppression (<500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) and HIV-1 RNA rebound (,500 copies/mL), while stratifying patients into those that received boosted and unboosted PI-based HAART as the initial regimen, using Kaplan,Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results During the study period, 682 patients initiated therapy with unboosted PI and 320 individuals initiated HAART with a boosted PI. Those who initiated therapy with a boosted PI were more likely to have a CD4 cell count <200 cells/,L and to have a plasma HIV RNA>100 000 copies/mL, and to have AIDS at baseline (all P<0.001). However, when we examined virological response rates, those who initiated HAART with a boosted PI achieved more rapid virological suppression [relative hazard 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06,1.51, P=0.010]. Conclusions Patients prescribed boosted PIs achieved superior virological response rates despite baseline factors that have been associated with inferior virological responses to HAART. Despite the inherent limitations of observational studies which require this study be interpreted with caution, these findings support the use of boosted PIs for initial HAART therapy. [source] Latest news and product developmentsPRESCRIBER, Issue 21 2008Article first published online: 2 DEC 200 Osteoporosis guideline A new guideline on the management of osteoporosis in men over 50 and post-menopausal women has been published by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (www.shef.ac.uk/NOGG), a group of organisations representing health professionals and patients, with funding from several pharmaceutical companies. The guideline recommends using the FRAX tool (www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX) to assess the 10-year fracture risk in individuals with risk factors to facilitate targeting DXA scans to measure bone mineral density. Patients who have already sustained a fragility fracture should be treated without risk assessment. Treatment recommendations are similar to those published in draft NICE guidance on primary and secondary prevention, selecting alendronate as the drug of first choice for most patients. Efalizumab efficacy A multicentred postapproval trial has demonstrated long-term efficacy and a favourable safety profile for efalizumab (Raptiva) in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The CONTROL II study, presented in September at the 17th EADV congress in Paris, was conducted at 170 sites in 18 European countries and involved 1255 patients who had failed to respond to traditional systemic therapies. In this non-blinded study, 68 per cent of participants achieved the primary efficacy end-point and showed improvement within the first 12 weeks; control was maintained in responding patients who continued treatment. Adverse effects were graded as mild or moderate and similar to those reported in earlier studies. There was no evidence of an increase in malignancies or infections. New oral anticoagulant Rivaroxaban (Xarelto), an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been introduced for the prevention of venous thrombo-embolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery. Compared with the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin (Clexane), rivaroxaban has been shown to reduce the risk of venous thrombosis by 70 per cent after hip replacement and by 49 per cent after knee replacement; the risk of bleeding was similar. At the recommended dose of 10mg once daily, prophylaxis after hip surgery lasts five weeks and costs £157; prophylaxis after knee surgery lasts two weeks and costs £63. New products UCB Pharma has introduced lacosamide (Vimpat) as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset epilepsy with or without secondary generalisation in patients aged 16 and over. A month's treatment at the recommended maintenance dose of 100-200mg twice daily costs approximately £73-£140. A new non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRI) is available for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and other antiretrovirals in treatment-experienced adults. Etravirine (Intelence) costs approximately £320 for one month's treatment at the recommended dose of 200mg twice daily. Voltarol Pain-Eze (diclofenac) 12.5mg tablets are now available without prescription; a pack of 18 tablets costs £5.99. Atypicals and EPS risk Atypical antipsychotics are not associated with a significantly lower risk of extra-pyramidal symptoms than first-generation agents such as perphenazine (Fentazin), a new analysis of the CATIE study has shown (Br J Psychiatry 2008;193:279,88). CATIE was a large trial comparing the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in which perphenazine was a representative first-generation agent (Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:611,22). This analysis found no differences in the risk of parkinsonism, dystonia, akathisia or tardive dyskinesia between perphenazine and the newer antipsychotics; use of antiparkinsonian medication was higher with risperidone and lower with quetiapine (Seroquel). Mental health website A new website offering information about mental illnesses and drug treatment has been launched by the United Kingdom Psychiatric Pharmacy Group (UKPPG), the College of Mental Health Pharmacists (CMHP), the Pharmaceutical Schizo-phrenia Initiative (PSI) and the National Institute for Mental Health in England (NIMHE). www.choiceandmedication.org.uk includes information about 17 mental illnesses and a large number of drug treatments. It offers links to other sites offering information and downloadable leaflets, help to identify the local mental health trust and downloadable charts comparing treatments for each indication. [source] Minimal effect of MDR1 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in HIV-infected patientsBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 3 2007Caroline Solas What is already known about this subject ,,Before this study, few data were available on the potential effect of genetic variants of P-glycoprotein or the CYP3A5 enzyme on the pharmacokinetic variability of protease inhibitors (PI). ,,MDR1 C3435T polymorphism was often linked with the pharmacokinetic variability of nelfinavir. CYP3A5*3 polymorphism was linked with the pharmacokinetic variability of calcineurin inhibitors and was therefore strongly suspected of being one of the key factors in the pharmacokinetic variability of other CYP3A susbtrates. What this study adds ,,Our results showed that both MDR1 C3435T and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms are involved in the pharmacokinetic variability of the absorption or elimination of indinavir, but probably jointly with other factors. ,,The potent CYP3A inhibitory effect of ritonavir may hide the variability linked to genetic differences in the CYP3A5 gene, thereby reducing the overall pharmacokinetic variability of the boosted protease inhibitor. ,,Genotyping MDR1 and/or CYP3A5 does not appear to be a clinically relevant factor in optimizing protease inhibitor boosted regimens. Aims The protease inhibitor indinavir is characterized by an important interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, which results from the actions of the metabolizing enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and the multidrug efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by MDR1. Using a population pharmacokinetic approach, we investigated the effect of several MDR1 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetic parameters of indinavir in HIV-infected patients. Methods Twenty-eight patients receiving indinavir alone or together with ritonavir were included. Indinavir pharmacokinetics were studied over a 12 h interval. Genetic polymorphisms were assessed by real-time PCR assays and direct sequencing for MDR1 and by PCR-SSCP analysis for CYP3A5. Results The pharmacokinetics of indinavir were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption. In the final model, the MDR1 C3435T genotype and ritonavir were identified as statistically significant covariates (P , 0.001) for the absorption rate constant (95% confidence interval on the difference between CC and CT genotype 0.37, 5.53) and for clearance (95% confidence interval on the difference 5.8, 26.2), respectively. Patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype receiving indinavir alone had a 31% decrease in the indinavir clearance rate compared with patients carrying the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype. Conclusions The MDR1 C3435T genotype affects the absorption constant of indinavir suggesting that P-gp may be implicated in its pharmacokinetic variability. Through its inhibition of CYP3A and P-gp, ritonavir could attenuate the pharmacokinetic variability linked to genetic differences, reducing significantly the interindividual variability of indinavir. However, genotyping MDR1 and/or CYP3A5 to optimize protease inhibitor boosted regimens does not seem clinically relevant. [source] Effects of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone on the efficacy of first-line boosted highly active antiretroviral therapy based on protease inhibitors: meta-regression analysis of 12 clinical trials in 5168 patientsHIV MEDICINE, Issue 9 2009A Hill Objectives Tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) and abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) are widely used with ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) as first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), but there is conflicting evidence on their relative efficacy. The ACTG 5202 and BICOMBO trials suggested higher efficacy for TDF/FTC, whereas the HEAT trial showed no efficacy difference between the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbones. Methods A systematic MEDLINE search identified 21 treatment arms in 12 clinical trials of 5168 antiretroviral-naïve patients, where TDF/FTC (n=3399) or ABC/3TC (n=1769) was used with RTV-boosted PI. For each NRTI backbone and RTV-boosted PI, the percentage of patients with viral load <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 48 by standardized Intent to Treat, Time to Loss of Virological Failure (ITT TLOVR) analysis were combined using inverse-variance weighting. The effect of baseline HIV RNA, CD4 cell count and choice of NRTI backbone were examined using a weighted analysis of covariance. Results Across all the trials, HIV RNA suppression rates were significantly higher for those with baseline viral load below 100 000 copies/mL (77.2%) vs. above 100 000 copies/mL (70.9%) (P=0.0005). For the trials of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) and fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FAPV/r) using either TDF/FTC or ABC/3TC, the HIV RNA responses were significantly lower when ABC/3TC was used, relative to TDF/FTC, for all patients (P=0.0015) and for patients with baseline viral load <100 000 copies/mL (70.1%vs. 80.6%, P=0.0161), and was borderline for those with viral load >100 000 copies/mL (67.5%vs. 71.5%, P=0.0523). Conclusions This systematic meta-regression analysis suggests higher efficacy for first-line use of a TDF/FTC NRTI backbone with boosted PIs, relative to use of ABC/3TC. However, this effect may be confounded by differences between the trials in terms of baseline characteristics, patient management or adherence. [source] | ||||||||||