| |||
Bone Bank (bone + bank)
Selected AbstractsAudit of the Douglas Hocking Research Institute bone bank: ten years of non-irradiated bone graftANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 1-2 2009David Love Abstract Background:, An audit performed in the use of non-irradiated femoral head bone graft at the Geelong Hospital over a 10-year period. While it is thought the non-irradiated bone graft provides a better structural construct there is theoretical increased risk of infection transmission. Methods:, We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data in the use of non-irradiated bone allograft used from the Geelong Hospital Douglas Hosking Research Institute bone bank over a 10-year period. The review was performed using data collected from the bone bank and correlating it with the patient's medical record. All complications, including infections, related to the use of the allograft were recorded. Results:, We found that over the 10 years to 2004 that 811 femoral heads were donated, with 555 being used over 362 procedures in 316 patients. We identified a total of nine deep infections, of which seven were in joint replacements. Overall this was a 2.5% deep infection rate, which was lowered to 1.4% if the previously infected joints that were operated on were excluded. Conclusion:, The use of non-irradiated femoral head bone graft was safe in a regional setting. [source] A New Technique for Reconstruction of the Atrophied Narrow Alveolar Crest in the Maxilla Using Morselized Impacted Bone Allograft and Later Placement of Dental ImplantsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2008Per Holmquist DDS ABSTRACT Background: In cases when the alveolar crest is too narrow to host an implant, lateral augmentation is required. The use of autogenous bone blocks harvested from the iliac crest is often demanded. One disadvantage is the associated patient morbidity. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clinically and histologically evaluate the use of morselized impacted bone allograft, a novel technique for reconstruction of the narrow alveolar crest. Materials and Methods: Two patients with completely edentulous maxillae and one partially edentulous, with a mean age of 77 years (range 76,79 years) were included in the study. The alveolar crest width was <3 mm without possibility to place any implant. Bone grafts were taken from a bone bank in Gävle Hospital. Bone from the neck of femur heads was milled to produce bone chips. The milled bone was partially defatted by rinsing in 37°C saline solution. After compression of the graft pieces with a size of 15 mm (height), 30 mm (length), and 6 mm (width), they were then fit to adapt to the buccal surface of the atrophied alveolar crest. One piece was placed to the right and one to the left side of the midline. On both sides fibrin glue was used (Tisseel®, Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) to stabilize the graft. After 6 months of graft healing, dental implants were placed, simultaneously biopsies were harvested and in one patient two oxidized microimplants were placed. At the time of abutment connection, microimplants were retrieved with surrounding bone for histology. Fixed screw-retained bridges were fabricated in mean of 7 months after implant surgery. Radiographs were taken before and after implant surgery and after 1 year of loading. Results: Sixteen implants with an oxidized surface were placed (TiUnite®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). After 1 year of functional loading, all implants were clinically stable. The marginal bone loss was 1.4 mm (SD 0.3) after 1 year of loading. The histological examination showed resorption and subsequent bone formation on the allograft particles. There were no signs of inflammatory cell infiltration in conjunction with the allograft. The two microimplants showed bone formation directly on the implant surface. Conclusions: This study shows that morselized impacted bone allograft can be used to increase the width of the atrophied narrow alveolar crest as a good alternative to autogenous bone grafts in elderly patients. The histological examination of biopsies revealed a normal incorporation process and no signs of an immunological reaction. Further studies with larger samples are of important to be able to conclude if equal results can be obtained using morselized impacted bone allograft as for autogenous bone graft. [source] |