Bowel Perforation (bowel + perforation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Colonic perforation after endoscopic biopsy of a submucosal tumor: successful conservative treatment

DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 4 2002
Kuang-I.
Colonoscopy is a powerful diagnostic and therapeutic procedure with a recognized risk of complications ranging from perforation to hemorrhage and septicemia. Perhaps the most dangerous complication associated with this procedure is bowel perforation. Although some colonic perforations can be treated medically, prompt surgery is generally preferred to minimize morbidity and mortality. We present a case of colonic perforation resulting from bite biopsy followed by mucosal resection of a submucosal tumor. Perforation occurred in a delayed manner despite prophylactic closure of the mucosal defect by the replacement of endoclips. The patient recovered spontaneously after antibiotic treatment and reduction of oral intake. We carried out successful conservative medical treatment of a minor iatrogenically induced bowel perforation without operation. [source]

Peritoneal mesothelioma presenting as an acute surgical abdomen due to jejunal perforation

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, Issue 4 2007
Nikolaos S SALEMIS
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare disease associated with poor prognosis. Acute abdomen as the first presentation is an extremely rare occurrence. We report an exceptional case of a patient who was found to have a jejunal perforation due to infiltration of peritoneal mesothelioma. METHODS: A 62-year-old man was admitted with clinical signs of peritonitis. Computerized tomographic scans showed a mass distal to the ligament of Treitz, thickening of the mesentery and a small amount of ascites. RESULTS: Emergency laparotomy revealed a perforated tumor 15 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz and diffuse peritoneal disease. Segmental small bowel resection and suboptimal cytoreduction were performed. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry showed infiltration of malignant mesothelioma. During the postoperative period pleural mesothelioma was also diagnosed. Despite adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient died of disseminated progressive disease 7 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare malignancy with grim prognosis. Small bowel involvement is a poor prognostic indicator. Our case of a small bowel perforation due to direct infiltration by peritoneal mesothelioma appears to be the first reported in the English literature. [source]

Absorption of tobramycin and amphotericin B during SDD in a patient with a bowel perforation

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2009
D. Posthouwer
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Sacrocolpopexy using xenogenic acellular collagen in patients at increased risk for graft-related complications,,

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 4 2010
Filip Claerhout
Abstract Aims We studied the long-term anatomical and functional outcome following sacrocolpopexy for apical vaginal prolapse using xenogenic grafts in a population at increased risk for graft-related complications (GRCs). Methods Twenty-two consecutive patients with symptomatic apical prolapse were scheduled for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) with porcine grafts because they were presumed to be at risk for GRC, because of pre-existing vaginal ulcerations (n,=,4), concomitant vaginal prolapse repair (n,=,15), total hysterectomy (n,=,1), or intra-operative abdominal contamination due to accidental laceration of the vagina, bowel perforation (n,=,1) or the presence of infection (n,=,1). Either small intestinal submucosa (n,=,8) or dermal collagen (n,=,14) was used. Outcome measures were GRCs, anatomical cure (,Stage I at any compartment), subjective cure, impact on bowel, bladder, and sexual function measured by a standardized interview. Results At study closure 20 (91%) patients were available for functional evaluation and 16 (73%) for anatomical evaluation at a mean follow-up period of 27.4 months. The GRC rate was 25% (n,=,4) prompting reintervention in half, and including two patients with spondylodiscitis. The anatomical cure rate was 31.5%. Failures at the vault, anterior, and posterior compartments occurred in, respectively, 31%, 18.8%, and 50% of patients. The subjective cure rate was 60% and three patients (15%) underwent redo-LSC. Conclusion The strategy of using xenografts in patients at risk for GRC, did not prevent these to occur and was associated with a high anatomical and functional failure rate as well as reoperation rate. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:563,567, 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Life threatening tension pneumoperitoneum from intestinal perforation during air reduction of intussusception

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 9 2002
E. Ng MD, FRCPC
Summary We present a case report of a child with intussusception who underwent air reduction which was complicated by bowel perforation. Life threatening tension pneumoperitoneum developed rapidly and immediate needle decompression was life saving in this case. The pathophysiology of hyperacute abdominal compartment syndrome is discussed. [source]

Small bowel perforation associated with microwave endometrial ablation

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 4 2002
R Jamieson
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Role of resection and primary anastomosis of the left colon in the presence of peritonitis,

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 11 2000
Dr S. Biondo
Background Classically a primary colonic anastomosis is not performed in the presence of left colonic peritonitis. Recently there has been a trend towards resection and anastomosis in selected patients, but no prospective study concerning the safety of this approach has been published. The objective of this study was to define the role of intraoperative colonic lavage with resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) in left colonic peritonitis, and to evaluate the differences in outcome in patients with diffuse or localized peritonitis. Methods Between January 1994 and December 1998, 127 patients underwent emergency operation for a distal large bowel perforation. RPA was the operation of choice and was performed in 61 patients, 38 with localized and 23 with diffuse peritonitis. Septic shock, faecal peritonitis, immunocompromised status and American society of Anesthesiologists grade IV were contraindications to the one-stage procedure. Alternative operations used in high-risk patients were Hartmann's procedure in 55 patients, subtotal colectomy in eight and colostomy in three. Results There were two deaths (3 per cent) among 61 patients treated by RPA and one (2 per cent) case of clinical anastomotic dehiscence. Overall morbidity was 39 per cent and the overall mean(s.d.) hospital stay was 18(15) days. No statistical differences were observed between patients with localized and diffuse peritonitis treated by RPA. Conclusion RPA may be the operation of choice in selected patients with left colonic diffuse peritonitis. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source]