Borderline Ovarian Tumors (borderline + ovarian_tumor)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Molecular classification of borderline ovarian tumors using hierarchical cluster analysis of protein expression profiles

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 6 2002
Ayodele A. Alaiya
Abstract Ovarian tumors range from benign to aggressive malignant tumors, including an intermediate class referred to as borderline carcinoma. The prognosis of the disease is strongly dependent on tumor classification, where patients with borderline tumors have much better prognosis than patients with carcinomas. We here describe the use of hierarchical clustering analysis of quantitative protein expression data for classification of this type of tumor. An accurate classification was not achieved using an unselected set of 1,584 protein spots for clustering analysis. Different approaches were used to select spots that were differentially expressed between tumors of different malignant potential and to use these sets of spots for classification. When sets of proteins were selected that differentiated benign and malignant tumors, borderline tumors clustered in the benign group. This is consistent with the biologic properties of these tumors. Our results indicate that hierarchical clustering analysis is a useful approach for analysis of protein profiles and show that this approach can be used for differential diagnosis of ovarian carcinomas and borderline tumors. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Restaging surgery for women with borderline ovarian tumors

CANCER, Issue 6 2004
Results of a French multicenter study
Abstract BACKGROUND The purpose of the current study was to examine the surgical management of women with borderline ovarian tumors and the adequacy of initial staging according to the guidelines of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; to evaluate the impact of restaging operations; and to identify risk factors for initial understaging. METHODS In a retrospective French multicenter study, 54 of 360 women with borderline ovarian tumors underwent a restaging operation. After excluding women with initial complete staging (n = 62), epidemiologic, surgical, and histologic parameters and risk of recurrence were compared between women who underwent restaging (n = 54) and those who did not (n = 244). RESULTS One hundred fifty (41.6%) of 360 women underwent intraoperative histologic examination, which led to the diagnosis of a borderline tumor in 97 cases (64.7%). Thirty-seven (38.1%) of these 97 women had undergone complete initial staging procedures. A restaging operation was performed for 54 women. A lower median age and a higher rate of conservative treatment were noted in the group that underwent restaging. Eight (14.8%) of the 54 women who underwent restaging had their tumors upstaged: 7 of the 41 cases initially diagnosed as Stage IA tumors were upstaged to Stage IB (n = 3) or to Stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, or IIIC (n = 1 for each); in the eighth case, a Stage IC tumor was upstaged to Stage IIIA. Upstaging tended to be more common in women with serous borderline tumors (P = 0.06) and in women who underwent cystectomy (P = 0.08). There was no difference in recurrence rates according to whether a restaging operation was performed. The recurrence rates after conservative and radical treatment were 15.6% (25 of 160) and 4.5% (9 of 200), respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Women who initially were diagnosed with Stage IA disease and who had serous borderline tumors or underwent cystectomy appeared to derive the most benefit from restaging surgery. Nonetheless, the indications for restaging surgery remain controversial, as no difference in recurrence rate was observed between women who underwent restaging and those who did not. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society. [source]

Incidence patterns of invasive and borderline ovarian tumors among white women and black women in the United States,

CANCER, Issue 11 2002
Results from the SEER Program
Abstract BACKGROUND Malignant tumors of the ovary are the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies in the United States. Population-based incidence data for these neoplasms by histopathologic type and race are limited. Variation in rates may provide clues for future etiologic studies. METHODS The authors performed a detailed, population-based analysis of U.S. incidence rates by histologic type, race, and age for invasive ovarian tumors that were diagnosed during 1978,1998 and for borderline ovarian tumors that were diagnosed during 1992,1998 using data from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. RESULTS White women had significantly higher rates compared with black women of all types of epithelial tumors, with the white:black rate ratios ranging from 1.23 to 2.56. Black women had higher rates of gonadal stromal tumors. Among both white women and black women, total carcinoma rates did not change greatly from 1978,1982 to 1995,1998. Among white women, the reported incidence rates for invasive serous, endometrioid, and clear cell tumors increased during 1978,1998, whereas the rates of mucinous; papillary, not otherwise specified (NOS); and other epithelial tumors declined. Among black women, the reported rates of papillary, NOS tumors decreased significantly, whereas the rates of other tumor types fluctuated. Incidence rates of borderline ovarian tumors were higher among white women compared with black women and did not change significantly during 1992,1998. Serous and mucinous tumors were the predominant tumors reported for women age < 45 years, whereas serous; papillary, NOS; and other epithelial tumors predominated among older women. CONCLUSIONS Incidence rates for malignant ovarian tumors have remained relatively stable, with higher rates for white women compared with black women. The reported rates for some specific histopathologic tumor types have changed over time, in part reflecting more specific pathologic classification. The possible effect of shifting exposure prevalence on incidence patterns warrants further study. Cancer 2002;95:2380,9. Published 2002 by the American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10935 [source]