|
| ||
|
|
||
Biventricular Pacemakers (biventricular + pacemaker)
Selected AbstractsShort-Term Effects of Right Ventricular Pacing on Cardiorespiratory Function in Patients With a Biventricular PacemakerCONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, Issue 6 2008Stefan Toggweiler MD The intention of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of right ventricular (RV) pacing on cardiorespiratory function in patients with a biventricular pacemaker. A group of 26 patients with a biventricular pacemaker was enrolled in this cross-over, single-blind study. All patients underwent spiroergometry and electrocardiography in RV and biventricular pacing mode. Peak work capacity (102±32 W and 107±34 W for RV and biventricular pacing mode, respectively; P<.01) and peak oxygen consumption (21.4±6.7 mL/min/kg and 22.6±7.0 mL/min/kg for RV and biventricular pacing mode, respectively; P<.01) were significantly lower in the RV pacing mode. Heart rate at rest was significantly higher with active RV pacing. Short-term RV pacing in patients with a biventricular pacemaker resulted in a higher heart rate at rest, a lower peak work capacity, and a lower peak oxygen consumption compared with that in the biventricular pacing mode. [source] Implant of a Biventricular Pacemaker in a Patient with Dextrocardia and Persistent Left Superior Vena CavaPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2006CHRISTIAN POTT Congenital anomalies of the heart can pose challenges to cardiac invasive procedures. Here, we present the case of a 40-year-old man with the combination of dextrocardia, a persistent left superior vena cava, and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. We describe the successful implantation of a biventricular pacemaker,defibrillator under this complex anatomic condition. [source] Double Counting of the Ventricular Electrogram in Biventricular Pacemakers and ICDsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2003S. SERGE BAROLD First page of article [source] Inhibition of Biventricular Pacemakers by Oversensing of Far-Field Atrial DepolarizationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2002IGOR LIPCHENCA LIPCHENCA, I., et al.: Inhibition of Biventricular Pacemakers by Oversensing of Far-Field Atrial Depo-larization. This report describes two patients who exhibited far-field oversensing of the P wave by the ventricular channel of a DDD biventricular pacemaker implanted for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Oversensing probably occurred secondary to slight displacement of the left ventricular lead in the coronary venous system. Long-term reliable pacing was restored by decreasing the sensitivity of the ventricular channel. [source] Preliminary Results with the Simultaneous Use of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Permanent Biventricular Pacemakers: Implications for Device Interaction and DevelopmentPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2000S. WALKER We report our preliminary experience with the combined use of implantable cardioverter defibrillutors (ICD) and biventricular pacemakers in six patients with heart failure and malignant ventricular arrhythmia. Two patients underwent ICD implantation for malignant ventricular arrhythmia after previous biventricular pacemaker implantation. One patient underwent biventricular pacemaker insertion for NYHA Class III heart failure after previous ICD implantation. Two patients underwent single device implantation. In the sixth patient, a combined implantation failed due to an inability to obtain a satisfactory left ventricular pacemaker lead position. The potential for device interaction was explored during implantation. In two patients a potentially serious interaction was discovered. Subsequent alterations in device configuration and programming prevented these interactions with long-term use. No complication of combined device use has been demonstrated during a mean follow-up of 2 months (range 1-4 months). Satisfactory ICD and pacemaker function has also been demonstrated. We conclude that combined device implantation may be feasible with currently available pacing technology and that further prospective studies are required in this area. [source] Short-Term Effects of Right Ventricular Pacing on Cardiorespiratory Function in Patients With a Biventricular PacemakerCONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, Issue 6 2008Stefan Toggweiler MD The intention of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of right ventricular (RV) pacing on cardiorespiratory function in patients with a biventricular pacemaker. A group of 26 patients with a biventricular pacemaker was enrolled in this cross-over, single-blind study. All patients underwent spiroergometry and electrocardiography in RV and biventricular pacing mode. Peak work capacity (102±32 W and 107±34 W for RV and biventricular pacing mode, respectively; P<.01) and peak oxygen consumption (21.4±6.7 mL/min/kg and 22.6±7.0 mL/min/kg for RV and biventricular pacing mode, respectively; P<.01) were significantly lower in the RV pacing mode. Heart rate at rest was significantly higher with active RV pacing. Short-term RV pacing in patients with a biventricular pacemaker resulted in a higher heart rate at rest, a lower peak work capacity, and a lower peak oxygen consumption compared with that in the biventricular pacing mode. [source] Implant of a Biventricular Pacemaker in a Patient with Dextrocardia and Persistent Left Superior Vena CavaPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2006CHRISTIAN POTT Congenital anomalies of the heart can pose challenges to cardiac invasive procedures. Here, we present the case of a 40-year-old man with the combination of dextrocardia, a persistent left superior vena cava, and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. We describe the successful implantation of a biventricular pacemaker,defibrillator under this complex anatomic condition. [source] Simple Access to the Coronary Venous System for Left Ventricular PacingPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2003DANY E. SAYAD Implantation of the LV lead for biventricular pacing can be challenging, time consuming, and often requires extensive fluoroscopy time. A conventional diagnostic 5 Fr left Amplatz catheter was used to cannulate the coronary sinus in 15 consecutive patients undergoing implantation of a biventricular pacemaker. When the coronary sinus was cannulated, the proximal end of the Amplatz catheter was cut and the coronary sinus sheath was passed over the Amplatz catheter that was then removed. Coronary sinus cannulation was achieved in all 15 patients with a mean fluoroscopy time of3.34 ± 1.9 minutes. Subsequent implantation of a biventricular pacemaker was successful and free of complications in all the 15 patients. (PACE 2003; 26:1856,1858) [source] Inhibition of Biventricular Pacemakers by Oversensing of Far-Field Atrial DepolarizationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2002IGOR LIPCHENCA LIPCHENCA, I., et al.: Inhibition of Biventricular Pacemakers by Oversensing of Far-Field Atrial Depo-larization. This report describes two patients who exhibited far-field oversensing of the P wave by the ventricular channel of a DDD biventricular pacemaker implanted for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Oversensing probably occurred secondary to slight displacement of the left ventricular lead in the coronary venous system. Long-term reliable pacing was restored by decreasing the sensitivity of the ventricular channel. [source] Preliminary Results with the Simultaneous Use of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Permanent Biventricular Pacemakers: Implications for Device Interaction and DevelopmentPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2000S. WALKER We report our preliminary experience with the combined use of implantable cardioverter defibrillutors (ICD) and biventricular pacemakers in six patients with heart failure and malignant ventricular arrhythmia. Two patients underwent ICD implantation for malignant ventricular arrhythmia after previous biventricular pacemaker implantation. One patient underwent biventricular pacemaker insertion for NYHA Class III heart failure after previous ICD implantation. Two patients underwent single device implantation. In the sixth patient, a combined implantation failed due to an inability to obtain a satisfactory left ventricular pacemaker lead position. The potential for device interaction was explored during implantation. In two patients a potentially serious interaction was discovered. Subsequent alterations in device configuration and programming prevented these interactions with long-term use. No complication of combined device use has been demonstrated during a mean follow-up of 2 months (range 1-4 months). Satisfactory ICD and pacemaker function has also been demonstrated. We conclude that combined device implantation may be feasible with currently available pacing technology and that further prospective studies are required in this area. [source] Optimization of Repolarization during Biventricular Pacing: A New Target in Patients with Biventricular Devices?ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2010Cengizhan Türko, lu M.D. Background: Evaluation of repolarization during sequentional biventricular pacing. Methods: Patients with biventricular devices, and left ventricular leads placed to the basal part of lateral left ventricular wall were enrolled. QRS, QTc, JTc, and corrected Tpeak-Tend intervals were compared during sequentional biventricular, left ventricular, and right ventricular pacing. Results: Five patients with nonischemic and five with ischemic cardiomyopathy due to anterior myocardial infarction were enrolled. No correlation was observed between values of repolarization among patients. The optimal values of repolarization were significantly different from values of echocardiographically guided hemodynamic optimization. Two patients with biventricular pacing-induced ventricular fibrillation were successfully treated by reprogramming of V-V delay according to interventricular delay resulting in shorter Tpeak-Tend interval, although delayed effect of amiodarone in one of these patients cannot be ruled out. Conclusions: Patients with biventricular devices may be prone to development of ventricular arrhythmias depending on programmed V-V interval. We suggest that optimization of repolarization may be performed in patients with biventricular pacemakers in the absence of backup ICD and those with frequent episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, although this finding deserves further study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15(1):36,42 [source] | ||||||||||